Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Revised Bills of the Regulatory Freedom Special Districts Act (focused on the Revised Bills by Proposed Kim Kyung-soo, Jung Sung-ho, Choo Kyung-ho, Hong Il-pyo)

규제자유특구법 개정안의 비교 고찰 (김경수, 정성호, 추경호, 홍일표, 개정안을 중심으로)

  • Kang, Min-Su (Ministry of SMEs and Startups) ;
  • Choi, Ho-Sung (Division of Korea Association of University, Research Institute and Industry) ;
  • Cho, Han-Jin (Dept. of Energy IT Engineering, Far East University)
  • 강민수 (중소벤처기업부 감사관실) ;
  • 최호성 (한국산학연협회 산학연사업팀) ;
  • 조한진 (극동대학교 에너지IT공학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.07
  • Accepted : 2019.03.20
  • Published : 2019.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Special Act on Regulatory Freedom Zone and Regional Special Development Zonet" introduced a new type of 'Freedom Special Zone of Regulation' that is legally distinguished from the existing Special Districts for Regional and Regional Development to support the innovative and strategic growth of the areas, and even passed a number of legal grounds for providing innovative regulations for regional development projects or regional strategic industries within the Special Districts. Starting with the bill legislation proposed by The Parliament Members, Kim Kyung-soo on behalf of 33 suggestors, Choo Kyung-ho, Jung Sung-ho and Hong Il-pyo submitted the bill legislation on behalf of 10 to 12 proposers, respectively. As a major matter of issue, the purpose, designation, scope of application, promotion system, application of A Bill of Three kind on Regulatory Innovation, and Balanced National Development, many kind of regulation as like types of menu, special cases, punitive regulations, and so on have been argued until the end of the bill proposed from the beginning. In this study, the differences between the bill suggested by the Parliament members and bill approved already are to be compared and analyzed to confirm how the items on issue were reflected for the bill finally and to draw up measures for the correct operation of the special regulations.

"규제자유특구 및 지역특화발전특구에 관한 규제특례법"은 지역의 혁신적이고 전략적인 성장을 지원하기 위해 기존 시군구의 지역특화발전특구와는 구별되는 새로운 유형의 '규제자유특구제도'를 시 도 단위를 대상으로 추가 도입하고, 지역의 혁신성장사업 또는 지역전략산업에 대해 혁신적인 규제특례를 부여할 수 있는 법적 근거를 마련하였다. 그러나 김경수 의원이 33인을 대표해서 발의한 의안을 시작으로 추경호, 정성호, 홍일표의원이 각각 10명~12명의 의원을 대표하여 의안을 제출하였으나 법이 통과되기까지 많은 사회적 이슈로 인하여 진통을 겪었다. 법안의 주요쟁점으로 규제자유특구의 목적, 명칭, 적용범위, 추진체계, 규제혁신 3종 세트의 적용, 메뉴판식 규제특례의 종류, 징벌규정 등 사실상 법안의 처음부터 끝까지 논쟁이 발생하였으나 각 법안들의 이슈들과 쟁점들을 여야 간의 합의를 거쳐 최종적으로 규제자유특구법이 전면 개정됨에 따라 본 연구에서는 각 의원 안과 통과법안의 차이점을 비교분석하고, 쟁점 항목이 어떻게 최종 법안에 반영되었는지 확인하여 규제자유특구의 올바른 운용을 위한 방안을 도출하고자 한다.

Keywords

Table 1. The Name of Proposed Bill

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_203_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Regional Comparison by Bill

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_203_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. The Comparison of Policy Decision legislative bodies According to the Bill

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_203_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Comprehensive Negative Regulatory System

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_203_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. J. S. Choi(2018). 4 Measures to rationalize regulations in the era of the Industrial Revolution. FUTURE HORIZON, (35), 18-21.
  2. H. Seo. (2018) The task of settling the regulated sandbox system. Weekly Financial Brief, 27(15), 3-11
  3. Y. H. Choi (2018). Policy Issues for Regulatory Innovation in ICT Sector during the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Focusing on Regulatory Sandboxes. Korea Institute of Policy Planning Seminar, 2018(2), 3-10
  4. J. H. Jung. (2017). The relationship between regulation and innovation and misunderstanding: centering on the discussion of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of the Korean Institute of Policy Studies, 2017, 45-64.
  5. H. W. Lee. (2017) Regulatory freezones, why the debate and how to understand it. Protocol Research, 52, 239-248.
  6. K. J. Kim. (2018). administrative action law implications according to regulatory redesign. Legal Issues, 38(2), 169-218.
  7. S. S. Jung. (2017). Technological development and financial regulation : The concept and possibility of Korean law in the right bar 'regulatory sandbox'. BFL, 85, 6-15
  8. H. O. Choi (2017). [Regulatory Sandbox] Policy Trends and Implication. Trends and Issues, (33), 1-20.
  9. J. C. Nam, (2016). Measures to Promote Regional Economy through Regulatory Free Zone. National Territory Policy Brief, (591), 1-6.
  10. J. B. Kim. (2017). The Necessity and Measures for the Change of Regulation System to Post-regulation Based on Principles. Weekly Financial Brief, 26(15), 11-13.
  11. D. S. Kim & J. Y. Jeon (2016). the legal implications and justification of the regulation free zone. Information Law, 20, 201-227.
  12. H. Y. Lee(2009). Regional Special Zone Policy and Regional Development. Homeland, 6-16.
  13. Y. W. Hwang & K. C. Kang (2006). A Study on the Institutional Complement for the Revitalization of Regional Special Development Zone. Tourism Leisure Research, 18(4), 229-241.
  14. B. D. Kim (2016). Global adoption trends and implications of regulatory safety space. Interstate Financial Brief, 25(29), 10-11.
  15. M. J. Kim. (2016). Name the issue: the industrial ecology that makes regulation relaxed. Urban Affairs, 51(566), 12-13.
  16. B. J. Kim. (2017). What will happen to the regulatory prezone in the new administration?. Monthly public policy, 142, 53-55.
  17. S. T. Kim, S. H. Jeon. & B. I. Lim. (2018). An Analysis on Macro-economic Effect of Tax Exemption in R&D Special Cluster, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 409-416 https://doi.org/10.4156/jcit.vol8.issue6.50
  18. D. S. Son, J. S. Lee. & Y. B. Kim. (2017), The Effects of Government Support and Regulation on SMEs Technology Innovation, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(4), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.117