DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보통신산업(ICT)의 글로벌 가치사슬구조분석

Global Value Chain Structure Analysis for ICT Industry

  • Cho, Sang Sup (Hoseo University, Department of Mgt. of Digital Technology) ;
  • Chae, Dong Woo (Department of Economics, Graduate School of Hoseo University) ;
  • Lee, Jungmann (Hoseo University, Department of Mgt. of Digital Technology)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.29
  • 심사 : 2019.12.19
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

This study describes the accounting approach of separating the value chain components that occur between the origin and destination of a country's total exports, and applied this analysis to the nation's information and communication industry. As a result of this study, the analysis results of ICT's global value chain for the United States and China, focusing on Korea, are as follows: First of all, the value added standard was relatively lower than the export amount standard for the information and communication industry. In particular, the gap was starkly visible in the information and communication manufacturing sector, where global vertical specialization was developed relatively. As a representative sector, the computer-related equipment sector exported to China became more specialized vertically than other information and communication industries. Next, the method of participating in vertical specialization of Korea's information and communication sector and its relative position in the global value chain came from domestic products (0.25/35.16) whose total exports, which were double calculated in the case of the U.S. market, returned home. On the other hand, about 32.68 percent returned to the Chinese market. Finally, in the global value chain level, the SW sector occupied a medium vertical culture location for the information and communication equipment sector and the information and communication service sector.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alfaro, L., Antras, P., Chor, D., and Conconi, P., "Internalizing Global Value Chains: A Firm-Level Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 127, 2019, pp. 509-559.
  2. Bank of Korea, The status and implications of the Global Value Chain, the International Economic Review, Vol 2018-11.
  3. Borin, A. and Mancini, M., "Follow the Value Added: Tracking Bilateral Relations in Global Value Chains," Economic Working Papers, Bank of Italy, 2017.
  4. Daudin, G., Rifflart, C., and Schweisguth, D., "Who Produces for Whom in the World Economy?," Canadian Journal of Economics Vol. 44, 2011, pp. 1403-1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01679.x
  5. Dean, J., Fung, K., and Wang, Z., "Measuring Vertical Specialization: The Case of China," Review of International Economics, Vol. 19, 2011, pp. 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.00969.x
  6. Dietzenbacher, E., Los B., Steher, R., Timmer, M., and Vries, G., "The Construction of World Input-Output Tables in the WIOD Project," Economic Systems Research, Vol. 25, 2013, pp. 71-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761180
  7. Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., and Samuelson, P., "Comparative Advantage, Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods," American Economic Review, Vol. 67, 1977, pp. 823-839.
  8. Feenstra, R. and Jensen, B., "Evaluating Estimates of Materials Offshoring from US Manufacturing," Economic Letters, Vol. 117, 2012, pp. 170-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.069
  9. Hummels, D., Ishii, J., and Yi, K. M., "The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54, 2001, pp. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
  10. Johnson, R. C. and Noguera, G., "Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 6, 2012, pp. 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003
  11. Koopman, R,, Wang, Z., and Wei, S. J., "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, Vol. 104, 2014, pp. 459-494. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459
  12. Lee, J. M. and Jung, Y. H., "The Structure and Understanding of WIOT(World Industry Association Table)", Quarterly National Accounts Review, 2017, pp. 46-70.