DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of the Capital Adequacy and Liquidity Regulation on Internet Primary Banks

인터넷전문은행의 자본적정성과 유동성 규제에 관한 연구

  • Bae, Jae Kwon (Dept. of Management Information Systems, Keimyung University)
  • Received : 2019.05.07
  • Accepted : 2019.06.18
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Basel III (Third Basel Accord or Basel Standards) is a global, voluntary regulatory framework on bank capital adequacy, stress testing, and market liquidity risk. Basel III regulatory ratios include capital adequacy, asset soundness, and liquidity. The capital adequacy variables include BIS capital adequacy ratio, BIS tier 1 capital ratio, and tangible common equity ratio. The asset soundness variables include non-performing loan ratio and non-performing loan coverage ratio. The liquidity regulation variables include KRW liquidity coverage ratio and foreign currency liquidity coverage ratio. This study aims to investigate how capital adequacy standard affects efficiency of internet primary banks. As a result of this study, BIS capital adequacy ratio of domestic internet primary banks is lower than that of commercial banks. In order to maintain sustainable operation considering capital adequacy regulations, it is necessary to expand additional capital. In addition, the delinquency rate and non-performing loan ratio of domestic internet primary banks is gradually increasing due to the maturity of high-yield loans in 2019.

바젤III(Basel III)는 국제결제은행(BIS)이 2010년에 확정한 강화된 재무건전성기준으로 대표적인 규제비율에는 자본적정성, 자산건전성, 유동성 등이 있다. 자본적정성 규제의 측정항목은 BIS자기자본비율, BIS기본자본비율, 단순자기자본비율로 구성된다. 자산건전성 규제의 측정항목에는 고정이하여신비율과 대손충당금적립률이 있으며, 유동성 규제의 측정항목에는 원화 및 외화 유동성커버리지비율 등이 있다. 본 연구는 은행의 건전성감독지표를 도출하고, 재무건전성 관점에서 국내 인터넷전문은행과 시중은행을 비교하여 문제점 도출과 해결방안을 모색해보고자 한다. 연구결과, 국내 인터넷전문은행의 자기자본비율은 시중은행에 비해 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 자본적정성 규제를 고려하여 지속적인 영업을 수행하기 위해서는 추가적인 자본확충이 필수적인 상황이다. 또한 국내 인터넷전문은행은 2019년에 중금리 대출의 만기가 도래하며 연체율과 고정이하여신비율이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 바젤I 적용을 받고 있는 인터넷전문은행은 재무건전성은 양호한 수준이나 바젤III 시행에 대비하여 BIS총자본비율과 보통주자본비율을 높여야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. G. E. Chortareas, C. Girardone, and A. Ventouri, Bank Supervision, Regulation, and Efficiency Evidence from the European Union, Journal of Financial Stability, (2012), Vol. 8, pp.292-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2011.12.001
  2. O. Havrylchyk, Efficiency of the Polish Banking Industry Foreign Versus Domestic Banks, Journal of Banking & Finance, (2006), Vol. 30, pp.1975-1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.07.009
  3. J. R. Barth, J. G. Caprio, and R. Levine, Bank Regulation and Supervision What Works Best?, Journal of Financial Intermediation, (2004), Vol. 13, pp.205-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2003.06.002
  4. G. Gorton, and R. Rosen, Corporate Control, Portfolio Choice, and the Decline of Banking, Journal of Finance, (1995), Vol. 50, No. 5, pp.1377-1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05183.x
  5. J. P. Hughes and L. J. Mester, Bank Capitalization and Cost Evidence of Scale Economics in Risk Management and Signaling, Review of Economics & Statistics, (1998), Vol. 80, No. 2, pp.314-325. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557401
  6. J. F. Abreu and M. A. Gulamhussen, Dividend Payouts: Evidence from U.S. Banking Holding Companies in the Context of the Financial Crisis, Journal of Corporate Finance, (2013), Vol. 22, pp.54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.04.001
  7. R. E. Shrieves and D. Dahl, The Relationship between Risk and Capital in Commercial Banks, Journal of Banking & Finance, (1992), Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.439-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(92)90024-T
  8. R. Aggrawal and K. Jacques, Assessing the Impact of Prompt Corrective Action on Bank Capital and Risk, Economic Policy Review, (1998), Vol. 4, No. 3, pp.23-32.
  9. A. Hovakimian and E. J. Kane, Effectiveness of Capital Regulation at U.S. Commercial Banks, 1985 to 1994, The Journal of Finance, (2000), Vol. 55, No. 1, pp.451-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00212
  10. T. Beck, A. Demirguc Kunt, and R. Levine, Bank Supervision and Corruption in Lending, Journal of Monetary Economics, (2006), Vol. 53, No. 8, pp.2131-2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.10.014