Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology (예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지)

The Convergent Research Society Among Humanities, Sociology, Science and Technology (인문사회과학기술융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determinants of New Product Performance and Environmental Dynamics as a Moderating Effect

신제품개발성과의 결정요인과 환경동태성의 조절효과

  • Liu, Zhen (Graduate School of Pusan National University) ;
  • Bang, Ho-Yeol (School of Business, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.05
  • Accepted : 2018.12.08
  • Published : 2019.01.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The most serious problem company facing in today's business environment is the failure of new product development outcomes. Statistically, almost half of the new products released each year failed. Despite the innovative technological advances, consumers' expectation level become much higher and global competition is intensifying. In addition, the new product life cycle is becoming shorter and shorter. It is difficult for a company to survive without developing long-lived products. The most important issue in a company's success and failure is the successful development and introduction of new products. Previous research has presented many determinants to achieve a successful new product development. This study focuses on dynamic competence as an important determinant, and identifies the constituting elements. Enterprises need to acquire, absorb, integrate and reconfigure their resources to survive and develop continuously. It is necessary to hold a dynamic ability switching resource bases in order to adapt to changing environments. The results of this study are as follows: First, the effect of learning, reconfiguration, and alliance capabilities on the new product development of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises seems to be positive. Second, the integrative and reconfiguration capabilities positively affect a new product development under high environmental turbulence.

오늘날 비즈니스 환경에서 기업이 직면한 가장 심각한 문제는 신제품개발성과에 실패하는 것이다. 통계적으로 매년 출시된 신제품의 거의 과반수이상이 시장에서 성공하지 못한 것으로 나타났다. 기술진보가 혁신적으로 일어남에도 불구하고 소비자의 기대수준은 더욱 높아지고 국내외 경쟁이 치열해짐에 따라 신제품 수명주기는 갈수록 짧아지고 있다. 시장에서 장기간 성공할 수 있는 상품을 개발하지 않고는 기업은 살아남기가 어렵다. 결국 기업의 성공과 실패에서 가장 중요한 문제는 신제품의 성공적인 도입과 개발일 수밖에 없다. 기존 연구에서 신제품개발성과를 달성하기 위해 다양한 요인을 제시하고 있지만 본 연구에서는 동적역량을 주요 요인으로 보고 구성요인을 파악하고자 한다. 기업이 지속적으로 생존하고 발전하기 위해서 자원을 획득, 흡수, 통합 및 재구성할 수 있는 역량이 필요하며 변화하는 환경에 적응하기 위해서 신속하게 자원기반을 전환할 수 있는 동적능력이 결정적이기 때문이다. 156개의 중국 중소제조기업을 대상으로 실증분석을 한 결과 학습역량, 재구성역량, 동맹역량이 신제품개발성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 환경동태성이 높을수록 통합역량과 재구성역량이 신제품개발성과에 강하게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano and A. Shuen, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal. (1997), Vol.18, No.7, pp.509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  2. R. G. Cooper and E. J. Kleinschmidt, Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors. Research-Technology Management. (2007), Vol.50, No.3, pp.52-66.
  3. D. J. Teece and G. Pisano, Dynamic Capabilities of a Firm: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change. (1994), Vol.3, No.3, pp.537-556.
  4. C. L. Wang and P. K. Ahmed, Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. (2007), Vol.9, No.1, pp.31-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
  5. Y. Lin and L-Y. Wu, Exploring the Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Firm Performance under the Resource-Based View Framework. Journal of Business Research. (2014), Vol.67, No.3, pp.407-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019
  6. T. Eriksson, N. Nummela and S. Saarenketo, Dynamic Capability in a Small Global Factory. International Business Review. (2014), Vol.23, No.1, pp.169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.03.007
  7. R. N. Langlois, Cognition and Capabilities: Opportunities Seized and Missed in the History of the Computer Industry. Working Paper. University of Connecticut. Presented at the conference on Technological Oversights and Foresights. Stern School of Business, New York University, March 11-12, 1994.
  8. O. Schilke, On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism. Strategic Management Journal. (2014), Vol.35, No.2, pp.179-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2099
  9. W. Zhan and Y. Luo, Performance Implication of Capability Exploitation and Upgrading in International Joint Ventures. Management International Review. (2008), Vol.48, No.2, pp.227-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0013-0
  10. F. T. Rothaermel and A. M. Hess, Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects. Organization Science. (2007), Vol.18, No.6, pp.898-921. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0291
  11. J. Weerawardena, G. Mort, P. Liesch and G. Knight, Conceptualizing Accelerated Internationalization in the Born Global Firm: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Journal of World Business. (2007), Vol.42, No.3, pp.294-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.004
  12. J. Liao, J. Kickul and H. Ma, Organizational Dynamic Capability and Innovation: An Empirical Examination of Internet Firms. Journal of Small Business Management. (2009), Vol.47, No.3. pp.263-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00271.x
  13. C. E. Helfat and M. A. Peteraf, Managerial Cognitive Capabilities and the Microfoundations of Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. (2015), Vol.36, No.6, pp.831-850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
  14. I. S. Prieto, E. Revilla and B. Rodriguez-Prado, Building Dynamic Capabilities in Product Development: How Do Contextual Antecedents Matter?. Scandinavian Journal of Management. (2009), Vol.25, No.3, pp.313-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2009.05.005
  15. D. J. Teece, Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal. (2007), Vol.28, No.13, pp.1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  16. Y. Y. Kor and A. Mesko, Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Configuration and Orchestration of Top Executives' Capabilities and the Firm's Dominant Logic. Strategic Management Journal. (2013), Vol.34, No.2, pp.233-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2000
  17. P. A. Pavlou and O. A. EI Sawy, From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development. Information systems Research. (2006), Vol.17, No.3, pp.198-227. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0094
  18. S. J. Marsh and G. N. Stock, Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of International Integration Knowledge Retention and Interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. (2006), Vol.23, No.5, pp.422-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00214.x
  19. R. Wilden and S. P. Gudergan, The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Operational Marketing and Technological Capabilities: Investigating the Role of Environmental Turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences. (2015), Vol.43 No.2 pp.181-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0380-y
  20. K. M. Eisenhardt and J. A. Martin, Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?. Strategic Management Journal. (2000), Vol.21, No.10-11, pp.1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  21. L. L. Neider and C. A. Schriesheim, The Authentic Leadership Inventory(ALI): Development and Empirical Tests. The Leadership Quarterly. (2011), Vol.22, No.6, pp.1146-1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.008
  22. S-M. Tseng and P-S. Lee, The Effect of Knowledge Management Capability and Dynamic Capability on Organization Performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. (2014), Vol.27, No.2, pp.158-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-05-2012-0025
  23. A. Daghfous, Absorptive Capacity and the Implementation of Knowledge-Intensive Best Practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal. (2004), Vol.69, No.2, pp.21-27.
  24. R. Amit and P. J. H. Schoemaker, Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal. (1993), Vol.14, No.1, pp.33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
  25. O. Schilke and A. Goerzen, Alliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement. Journal of Management. (2010), Vol.36, No.5, pp.1192-1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310362102
  26. H. Schildt, T. Keil and M. Maula, The Temporal Effects of Relative and Firm-Level Absorptive Capability on Interorganizational Learning. Strategic Management Journal. (2012), Vol.33, No.10, pp.1154-1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1963
  27. P. Porrini, Can a Previous Alliance Between an Acquirer and a Target Affect Acquisition Performance?. Journal of Management. (2004), Vol.30, No.4, pp.545-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.02.003
  28. M. J. D. Powell, The Theory of Radial Basis Function Approximation in 1990, in "Advances in Numerical Analysis, Volume 2: Wavelets, Subdivision Algorithms and Radial Basis Functions" (W. A. Light, Ed.), pp.105210, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992.
  29. D-Y. Li and J. Liu, Dynamic Capabilities, Environmental Dynamism, and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research. (2014), Vol.67, No.1, pp.2793-2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007
  30. G. Schreyogg and M. Kliesch-Eberl, How Dynamic Can Organizational Capabilities be? Towards a Dual-Process Model of Capability Dynamization. Strategic Management Journal. (2007), Vol.28, No.9, pp.913-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.613