The Research Journal of the Costume Culture (복식문화연구)

The Costume Culture Association (복식문화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does need for touch matter in the context of apparel online shopping? - Compensatory role of online aesthetic and instrumental cues -

  • Ha, Young (Dept. of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University)
  • Received : 2019.01.07
  • Accepted : 2019.02.11
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the compensatory role of instrumental (e.g., product information) and aesthetic (e.g., website background) online cues presented within apparel websites where touch is unavailable. The moderating role of two need for touch (NFT) dimensions (i.e., autotelic and instrumental NFT) between online cues and consumer responses was also investigated. Results demonstrate that personal differences in autotelic and instrumental NFT moderate the relationship between online cues and affective responses. It was found that consumers high in autotelic NFT (i.e., who need to touch for fun) seek more instrumental cues to compensate for lack of touch when shopping apparel products online. Surprisingly, consumers high in instrumental NFT (i.e., who need to touch for product evaluation) use aesthetic as well as instrumental cues to supplement the absence of touch. In contrast, for the low NFT groups, only aesthetic online cues showed significant effects on consumer arousal. Further analysis shows that instrumental NFT is negatively related to purchase intention while autotelic NFT has a positive effect on purchase intention. This implies that need for hedonic-oriented touch is no longer a barrier for online apparel shopping. However, the instrumental NFT seems a significant obstacle for the adoption of online apparel purchasing.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1991). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 429-439. doi:10.1086/208568
  3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  4. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
  5. Cho, S., & Workman, J. (2011). Gender, fashion innovativeness and opinion leadership, and need for touch: Effects on multi-channel choice and touch/non-touch preference in clothing shopping. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15(3), 363-382. doi:10.1108/13612021111151941
  6. Chowdhury, J., Reardon, J., & Srivastava, R. (1998). Alternative modes of measuring store image: An empirical assessment of structured versus unstructured measures. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), 72-86. doi:10.1080/10696679.1998.11501797
  7. Citrin, A. V., Stem, D. E., Jr., Spangenberg, E. R., & Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer need for tactile input: An internet retailing challenge. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 915-922. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00278-8
  8. Darley, W. K., & Lim, J.-S. (1999). Effects of store image and attitude toward secondhand stores on shopping frequency and distance traveled. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(8), 311-318. doi:10.1108/09590559910288596
  9. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2001). Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 177-184. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00087-9
  10. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139-150. doi:10.1002/mar.10064
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  12. Gonzalez-Benito, O., Martos-Partal, M., & San Martin, S. (2015). Brands as substitutes for the need for touch in online shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 121-125. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.015
  13. Ha, Y., & Lennon, S. J. (2010). Online visual merchandising (VMD) cues and consumer pleasure and arousal: Purchasing versus browsing situation. Psychology & Marketing, 27(2), 141-165. doi:10.1002/mar.20324
  14. Ha, Y., & Lennon, S. J. (2011). Consumer responses to online atmosphere: The moderating role of atmospheric responsiveness. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 2(2), 86-94. doi:10.1080/20932685.2011.10593086
  15. Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404-420. doi:10.1086/209123
  16. Hornik, J. (1992). Tactile stimulation and consumer response. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 449-458. doi:10.1086/209314
  17. Hu, H., & Jasper, C. R. (2006). Social cues in the store environment and their impact on store image. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(1), 25-48. doi:10.1108/09590550610642800
  18. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(2), 45-59. doi:10.1002/dir.20113
  19. Kim, J.-E., Ju, H. W., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2009). Sales associate's appearance: Links to consumers' emotions, store image, and purchases. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(5), 407-413. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.06.001
  20. Kim, M., & Lennon, S. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178. doi:10.1002/mar.20204
  21. Lin, H.-F. (2007). The impact of website quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in the B2C e-commerce context. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(4), 363-378. doi:10.1080/14783360701231302
  22. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  23. Oh, J., Fiorito, S. S., Cho, H., & Hofacker, C. F. (2008). Effects of design factors on store image and expectation of merchandise quality in web-based stores. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(4), 237-249. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.03.004
  24. Olney, T. J., Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1991). Consumer responses to advertising: The effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 440-453. doi:10.1086/208569
  25. Pan, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Determinants of retail patronage: A meta-analytical perspective. Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 229-243. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.008
  26. Park, J., Hill, W. T., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2015). Exploring the relationship between cognitive effort exertion and regret in online vs. offline shopping. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 444-450. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.034
  27. Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 22(9), 695-719. doi:10.1002/mar.20080
  28. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003a). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The "need for touch" scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430-442. doi:10.1086/378619
  29. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003b). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35-48. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612
  30. Peck, J., & Wiggins, J. (2006). It just feels good: Customers' affective response to touch and its influence on persuasion. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 56-69. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.56
  31. Rowley, J. (2002). E-business: Principles & practice. Chippenham. Wiltshire: Palgrave.
  32. Sherman, E., & Smith, R. B. (1987). Mood states of shoppers and store image: Promising interactions and possible behavioral effects. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 251-254.
  33. Thang, D. C. L., & Tan, B. L. B. (2003). Linking consumer perception to preference of retail stores: An empirical assessment of the multi-attributes of store image. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(4), 193-200. doi:10.1016/S0969-6989(02)00006-1
  34. Van der Heijden, H., & Verhagen, T. (2004). Online store image: Conceptual foundations and empirical measurement. Information & Management, 41(5), 609-617. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.07.001
  35. Workman, J. E. (2010). Fashion consumer groups, gender, and need for touch. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(2), 126-139. doi:10.1177/0887302X09356323
  36. Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Yen, D. C. (2008). The atmospheric factors of online storefront environment design: An empirical experiment in Taiwan. Information & Management, 45(7), 493-498. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.07.004
  37. Yazdanparast, A., & Spears, N. (2012). Need for touch and information processing strategies: An empirical examination. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(5), 415-421. doi:10.1002/cb.1393
  38. Yazdanparast, A., & Spears, N. (2013). Can consumers forgo the need to touch products? An investigation of nonhaptic situational factors in an online context. Psychology & Marketing, 30(1), 46-61. doi:10.1002/mar.20588
  39. Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 123-131. doi:10.1086/208905