환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

복원대상습지 선정 사례 연구 - 2016년 전국내륙습지 모니터링 결과를 중심으로 -

A Case Study on Selecting Sites for Wetland Restoration - Focusing on the Research Survey of National Inland Wetlands Monitoring in 2016 -

  • 이정환 (국립환경과학원 국립습지센터) ;
  • 이창수 (국립환경과학원 국립습지센터) ;
  • 김미정 (국립생태원 생태보전연구본부 생태보전연구실)
  • Lee, Jung-Hwan (National Wetlands Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Su (National Wetlands Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Jeong (Ecological Conservation, Bureau of Ecological Research, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 투고 : 2018.12.20
  • 심사 : 2019.01.30
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 습지를 대상으로 추진하는 복원사업 시, 사업대상지 선정에 필요한 의사결정 기초자료 제공을 목적으로 진행하였다. 2016년에 실시된 전국내륙습지 모니터링 결과를 바탕으로 훼손습지 현황을 파악하고, 복원 필요성 판단을 위해 소실 원인과 생태적 보전가치 및 법 제도적 보전가치를 평가하였다. 2016년 전국내륙습지 모니터링 결과, 훼손습지는 총 20개소로 확인되었고, 생태 및 법 제도적 가치와 현장 검증을 거쳐 복원 가치가 높다고 판단되는 1개소를 도출하였다. 본 연구의 과정은 다수의 훼손습지 중 우선적으로 복원해야 할 필요성이 습지를 선정하는 데 필요한 정책적 의사결정 기초자료로써 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다. 한편 우리나라의 경우 보전가치가 높지만, 보호지역으로 지정되지 않은 습지의 경우 법 제도적으로 보호할 수 있는 수단이 없어 이를 보완할 수 있는 법 제도 마련이 필요하다.

This study aims to provide basic data for the decision-making process in selecting sites for wetland restoration projects. To this end, the current list of demaged wetlands was identified based on the findings from the nationwide monitoring project in 2016 targeted at wetlands in inland areas. Then, to determine the necessity of restoration for these demaged sites, the cause of demage was investigated, and their conservation value was examined from an ecological and legal perspective. The 2016 monitoring project identified a total of 20 demaged wetlands, of which one site was deemed to have high conservation value through analysis of its ecological and legal values and on-site reviews. The results of this study are expected to support policymakers' decision-making in selecting wetlands for restoration projects since it identifies priority sites among demaged wetlands that require immediate restoration efforts. It should also be pointed out that wetlands in South Korea cannot benefit from legal protection despite their high conservation value unless they have a designated status as protected areas.

키워드

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Monitoring site of inland wetland monitoring in 2016

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Geographical distribution of monitoring site by region

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Geographical distribution of demaged wetlands by Region.

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 4. Distribution of demaged wetlands in Ecology and Nature Map level 1 areas

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 5. Distribution of demaged wetlands in Environmental Conservation Value Assessment level 1, 2 area

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 6. Selection result of site to be restored from the damaged wetlands

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_f0008.png 이미지

Figure 7. Distribution of inland wetlands in Ecology and Nature Map level 1 area

Table 1. Status of demaged wetland by region.

HOPHBL_2019_v28n1_71_t0001.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Ahn KS, Kim HS, Kim JG. 2016. Wetlands. Lifescience; p. 604.[Korean Literature]
  2. Ahn SE. 2007. A Meta-regression Analysis of Wetland Valuation Studies in Korea. Environmental and Resource Economics Review. 16(1): 65-98.[Korean Literature]
  3. Chen GQ, Shao L, Chen ZM, Li Z, Zhang B, Chen H. Wu Z. 2011. Low-carbon assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland in Beijing. Ecological Engineering, 37(4): 622-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.12.027
  4. Choi YK, Lee BH, Oh SY, Kim TY, Wende W, Ohlenburg H, Briffett C, Mun C, Um JH, Kwon YS, Choi JY, Lee YH, Park HY. 2006. Spatial development and environmental degradation: Countermeasures focusing on planning process and institutionalization. K-Developedia(KDI School) Repository. 2006-21. http://www.krihs.re.kr [Korean Literature]
  5. Costanza R, Farber SC, Maxwell J. 1989. Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecological economics, 1(4): 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(89)90014-1
  6. Edward B, Barbier, Mike A, Duncan K. 2005. Economic valuation of wetlands. Ramsar Convention Bureau; P. 116.
  7. Ha YS. 2009. A study environmental protection and international environment la. World constitutional Law Review. 15: 475-498.
  8. Hong SG, Kang HJ, Kim ES, Kim JG, Kim CH, Lee EJ, Lee JC, Lee JS, Lim BS, Choung YS, Chung HL, Cho HY. 2005. Restoration Ecology and Engineering: Conservation and Management of Habitats and Ecotope. Life Science Publishing Co.; P. 113.[Korean Literature]
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Climate change 2013: the phyical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Press, Cambrige, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  10. Jin DH. 2008. Strengthen wetland management with the occasion of the General Assembly of the Ramsar Convention. River and Culture. 4(4): 120-121.[Korean Literature]
  11. Jung YH, Kim I, Lee YJ. 2016. A Study on the WBI System Development for DRR Technology &Information Sharing by ISD Method. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. 16(1): 141-150. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.1.141
  12. Korea Forest Service. 2006. Performance of the Restoration Project for the Damaged Area of Baekdudaegan. Policy Briefing. [Korean Literature]
  13. Lee JH. 2010. The Economics of Extreme Weather. Meteopological Technology & Policy. 3(1): 4-11. [Korean Literature]
  14. Lee YW, Jeong JG, Yoon YS, Lim SY. 2012. High speed rail and the changes of spatial structure (II). K-Developedia(KDI School) Repository. 2006-19. [Korean Literature]
  15. Ministry of Environment. 2008. A Survey on Natural Environment Restoration Project and Improvement Plan. [Korean Literature]
  16. Ministry of Environment. 2009. Guidelines of Writing for Ecosystem and Nature Map.
  17. Ministry of Environment. 2011a. Guidelines of Survey for National Inland Wetlands. [Korean Literature]
  18. Ministry of Environment. 2011b. A Study on the Physical Restoration of Damaged Natural Environment. Ministry of Environment Report. [Korean Literature]
  19. National Wetland Center. 2016. 2nd National Inland Wetland Monitoring(2016). National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  20. National Wetland Center. 2017a. 2nd National Inland Wetland Monitoring(2017). National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  21. National Wetland Center. 2017b. Internal data. National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  22. Park KH, You JH, Song BG. 2010. Evaluation of Ecological Values of the Southern Coastal Wetlands in South Gyeongsang Province, Korea. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 24(4): 395-405. [Korean Literature]
  23. Pennak RW. 1989. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States. Protozoa to mollusca.
  24. Raison J, Eamus R, Gifford, McGrth J. 2007. Feasibility of forest free air $CO_2$ enrichment (FACE) experimentation in Australia. Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Water Resources, 108pp.
  25. Saggai MM, Ainouche A, Nelson M, Cattin F, El Amrani A. 2017. Long-term investigation of constructed wetland wastewater treatment and reuse: Selection of adapted plant species for metaremediation. Journal of environmental management, 201, 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.040
  26. Seo DC, Kang SW, Lim BJ, Park, JH, Kim KS, Lee, JB, Kim H, Heo JS, Chang NI, Seong HH, Cho JS. 2011. Evaluation of Aquatic Ecological Characteristics in Sinpyongcheon Constructed Wetlands for Treating Non-point Source Pollution. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44(3): 400-407. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.3.400
  27. Sim WB. 2005. Natural disasters and Urban prevention of disasters according to Climate Change. KRIHS(Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements). 3: 39-49. [Korean Literature]
  28. Van Aalst MK. 2006. The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters. 30(1): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00303.x
  29. Wilson EO. 1989. Threats to biodiversity. Scientific American. 261(3): 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-108
  30. Woodward RT, Wui YS. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecological economics. 37(2): 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7
  31. Yang W, Chang J, Xu B, Peng C, Ge Y. 2008. Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Ecological Economics. 68(1-2): 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008
  32. You JH, Park, KH, Yoon YC, Song BG. 2009. Vascular Plants in Coastal Wetland in Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea. Korean Wetlands Society. 11: 29-38. [Korean Literature]
  33. Yun KS. 2007. Soil and Vegetation Characteristics of Abandoned Paddy Field. The Korean Association of Professional Geographers. 13(2): 129-142. [Korean Literature]
  34. Zedler JB, Kercher S. 2005. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248