한국농공학회논문집 (Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)

  • 제61권2호
  • /
  • Pages.75-83
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1738-3692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7709(eISSN)
한국농공학회 (The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

입지계수를 이용한 지역 농특산물 지리적표시제의 정량적 평가기준 연구

Quantitative Evaluation on Geographical Indication of Agricultural Specialty Products using Location Quotient (LQ) Index

  • Kim, Solhee (Interdisciplinary Program of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Suh, Kyo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Institutes of Green-bio Science Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yooan (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chanwoo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Chanhoon (Interdisciplinary Program of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.11
  • 심사 : 2019.03.08
  • 발행 : 2019.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Using geographical indication, a type of source identification, can effectively promote local specialty agricultural products of superior quality, by identifying the specific geographic location or origin of the produce. Agricultural products can be registered using the geographical indication by describing the product's relation to its geographical origin including the reputation and quality. However, this indication has no objective standards to qualify goods as agricultural specialty products. The purpose of this study is to suggest basic criteria to define the characteristics and criteria of agricultural specialties based on a quantitative evaluation method. To propose this basic standard, we used the proportion of arable land to denote the major production areas and the location quotient (LQ) index to grasp the extent of the specialty of a product. The results show that the average LQ values of registered agricultural products, particularly apples, pears, and garlic, are 3.26, 8.01, and 2.82, respectively. This indicates that they are more specialized than produce from other areas that have not registered for a geographical indication. Low LQ values were found in some areas with registered rice geographical indications, which are also more focused on their historical reputation as the main rice producing areas. Considering the agricultural specialty of products, the recommendation is that the producing proportion should be over 1% of the national scale and over 10% of the province scale, and the LQ value should be over 2.0. This recommendation is not a requirement, but the criteria can prove to be useful in identifying a higher range of specialized agricultural products.

키워드

NGHHCI_2019_v61n2_75_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Location quotients by agricultural products (rice, garlic, apple, and pear) of Geographical Identification. The abbreviations mean the city name registered Geographical Identification; In the (a) rice, ICS (Icheon-si), CWG (Cheorwon-gun), YJS (Yeoju-si), GPS (Gimpo-si), GSS (Gunsan-si); In the (b) Garlic, USG (Uiseong-gun), NHG (Namhae-gun), SSS (Seosan-si), GHG (Goheung-gun); In the (c) apple, CJS (Chungju-si), MRS (Miryang-si), CSG (Cheongsong-gun), YSJ (Yeongju-si), MJG (Muju-gun), YSG (Yesan-gun); In the (d) pear, NJS (Naju-si), ASS (Anseong-si), CAS (Cheonan-si)

Table 1 Geographical indications of agricultural products by region (October 2018)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n2_75_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 Total cultivation area and proportion of agricultural products in 2016

NGHHCI_2019_v61n2_75_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3 Cultivation area and proportion of certified agricultural products by city

NGHHCI_2019_v61n2_75_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Baek, N., 2012. The Effect on preference cognition and Purchase intention for geographical indication collective mark of agricultural products. The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management 14(3): 103-127 (in Korean).
  2. Go, Y., 2007. A study on the concept and protection system for the geographical indication. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association 22(3): 165-184 (in Korean).
  3. Hyun, K., and K. Lee, 2011. Spatial diffusion patterns of the organic farms in Korea and the geographical characteristics. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea 14(3): 377-393 (in Korean). doi:10.23841/egsk.2011.14.3.377.
  4. Isserman, A. M., 1977. The location quotient approach for estimating regional economic impacts. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 43: 33-41. doi:10.1080/01944367708977758.
  5. Jo, Y., 2005. Forecasting on the shape of innovative cluster in seoul digital complex and policy theme. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association 17(1): 73-90 (in Korean).
  6. Kim, C., and T. Kim, 2012. A study of selection of the growth potential agricultural products in Ulsan City. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, 46(1): 1-9 (in Korean).
  7. Kim, H., K. Chae, J. Heo, S. Yoon, and B. Kim, 2016. A study on improving dry-field farming competitiveness in response to the expansion of market opening. Korea Rural Economic Institute (in Korean).
  8. Kim, J., and H. Kim, 2010. The impact of geographical indications on brand credibility of fruits. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(4): 1-24 (in Korean).
  9. Kim, Y., H. Yi, and J. Goh, 2012. Analysis of agricultural products quality certification system status. Journal of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences 24(4): 57-68 (in Korean).
  10. Lee, B., J. Yoon, and Y. Yoon, 2013. Evaluation of agricultural competitiveness by region of agricultural general survey. Agricultural Administration Focus, Korea Rural Economic Institute, 64: 1-23 (in Korean).
  11. Lee, D., K. Choi, and J. Hong, 2011. A study on the geographical indication system for promotion of regional industries. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  12. Lee, S., 2008. A study on implementing place branding of local government. Korea Research Institute for Local Administration (in Korean).
  13. National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS), Available at: http://www.naqs.go.kr (Accessed October 17, 2018).
  14. Nam, K., M. Oh, and H. Hong, 2008(a). New suggestion of relative concentration coefficients of NOHI. e-Employment Issue of Korea Employment Information Service (in Korean).
  15. Nam, K., M. Oh, and H. Hong, 2008(b). A study of developing a relative-specialization index using expected frequence. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics 21(4): 581-588 (in Korean). doi:10.5351/KJAS.2008.21.4.581.
  16. Seong, M., J. Seo, C. Jeon, K. Kim, and J. Heo, 2002. Agricultural product differentiation strategies at the regional level for corresponding to expanding openness of agricultural market. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.