Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Teacher-Students Interactions in the Image of Science Class by Elementary Preservice Teachers

초등학교 예비교사들의 과학 수업 이미지에 나타난 상호작용 분석

  • Received : 2019.10.22
  • Accepted : 2019.12.13
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the teacher-students interactions shown in the images of elementary science class by preservice teachers. We applied nine analysis criteria in three domains such as emotional support (climate, regard for student perspectives, teacher sensitivity), classroom organization (instructional learning formats, behavior management, productivity), and instructional support (quality of feedback, language modeling, concept development) in the aspects of positive or negative interactions The results show that majority of student-teachers tended to prefer positive interactions especially regarding instructional learning formats or concept development. For the image of avoided class, they tended to show negative interactions related to instructional learning formats or regard for student perspectives. However, they showed extremely lower frequencies for some categories of negative interactions. Female preservice teachers tended to have slightly higher frequencies for some positive interactions than their counterpart. The findings indicate possible approaches to teachers' professional development and further research.

본 연구의 목적은 초등학교 예비교사들의 과학 수업 이미지에 나타난 교사와 학생 간 상호작용을 조사하는 것이다. 정서적 지원(분위기, 학생 시각에 대한 관심, 교사 민감도), 수업 조직(교수학습 형식, 행동 조절, 생산성), 학습 지원(피드백의 질, 언어 모델링, 개념 발달)의 3개 영역 총 9개 기준에 의해 긍정적 상호작용과 부정적 상호작용을 분석하였다. 연구 결과 상당수 학생들이 교수학습 형식 또는 개념 발달에 해당하는 긍정적 상호작용을 선호하는 경향이 나타났다. 기피하는 수업의 경우에는 교수학습 형식 또는 학생 시각에 대한 관심 측면의 부정적 상호작용이 많이 나타났으나, 그 외 매우 낮은 빈도를 보인 상호작용 요소들도 있었다. 그리고 여자 예비교사들이 남자에 비해 긍정적인 상호작용을 약간 더 선호하는 것으로 조사되었다. 교사전문성에 대한 함의 및 후속 연구에 대한 제언을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, J. P., Kuperminc, G., Philliber, S., & Herre, K. (1994). Programmatic prevention of adolescent problem behaviors: The role of autonomy, relatedness, and volunteer service in the teen outreach program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(5), 617-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506897
  2. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pinta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
  3. Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2005). Effects of variation in teacher organization on classroom functioning. Journal of School Psychology, 43(1), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.12.002
  4. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypical images of the scientist: The draw a science test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
  5. Choi, H. (2015). A factor analysis of teacher-student interaction in elementary school. Journal of elementary education studies, 22(1), 127-150.
  6. Downer, J. T., Lopez, M. L., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, A., Pianta, R. C., & Howes, C. (2012). Observations of teacherchild interactions in classrooms serving Latinos and dual language learners: Applicability of the classroom assessment scoring system in diverse settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.005
  7. Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5
  8. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
  9. Eom, M. R., Kim, M. R., Chang, S. Y., & Park, I. W. (2009). A study on perception of good instruction between in-service and pre-service teachers. The Korea educational review, 15(1), 107-132.
  10. Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., & Klieme, E. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
  11. Jhun, Y., & Jung, H. (2017). A comparison of viewpoints on the science lesson between pre-service teachers and experienced teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.095
  12. Jung, M. S., & Park, J. G. (2011). Differences in teacher-student interaction by gender and its relationships with attitudes toward physical education. Korean Society of Sport Psychology, 22(4), 43-56.
  13. Kim, M., & Cho, H. (2017). The structural equation modeling of the relationship among achievement goal orientation, emotions, class participation and quality of instruction of elementary school teachers. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 31(1), 163-193. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2017.31.1.08
  14. Kim, M. (2011). A critical examination on the conditions of cood instruction: Focused on J. Dewey's concept of growth. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(3), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.15754/JKPE.2011.33.3.002002
  15. Knag, H. S., Shin, S. J., Cha, J. H., Han, J. Y., & Noh, T. (2007). Influences of current education programs for preservice chemistry teachers upon preservice science teachers' self-Images as science teachers. Journal of the Korea Chemical Society, 51(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.2.201
  16. Kwak, Y., & Kim, J. H. (2003). Qualitative research on common features of best practices in the secondary school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(2), 144-154.
  17. Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence? Child Development, 70(6), 1373-1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00101
  18. Linn, M. C., De Benedictis, T., Delucchi, K., Harris, A., & Stage, E. (1987). Gender differences in national assessment of educational progress science items: What does "i don't know" really mean? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240307
  19. Mensah, F. M. (2011). The DESTIN: Preservice teachers' drawings of the ideal elementary science teacher. School Science and Mathematics, 111(8), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00103.x
  20. Mitchem, K., Wells, D., & Wells, J. (2003). Using evaluation to ensure quality professional development in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(2), 96-103.
  21. Nam, J., Lee, S. D., Lim, J.-H., & Moon, S. B. (2010). An analysis of change in beginner science teacher's classroom interaction through mentoring program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(8), 953-970. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.8.953
  22. National Research Council (2005). How students team: History, mathematics and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  23. Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system manual: K-3. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.
  24. Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings 1979-2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40(6), 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00124-3
  25. Sandilos, L. E., & DiPerna, J. C. (2014). Measuring quality in kindergarten classrooms: Structural analysis of the classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS K-3). Early Education and Development, 25(6), 894-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2014.883588
  26. She, H.-C., & Fisher, D. (2002). Teacher communication behavior and its association with students' cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10009
  27. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  28. Thomas, J. A., Pedersen, J. E., & Finson, K. (2001). Validating the draw a science teacher test checklist (DASTT-C): Exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014216328867
  29. Wagner, W., Gollner, R., & Helmke, A. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domainindependent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003
  30. Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y
  31. Yeo, S., & Sung, S. M. (2013). Analysis of elementary teachers' professional performance about science teaching practice according to their personal variables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(4), 535, 544.