DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fourth molar: A retrospective study and literature review of a rare clinical entity

  • Bamgbose, Babatunde O. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Okada, Shunsuke (Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital) ;
  • Hisatomi, Miki (Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital) ;
  • Yanagi, Yoshinobu (Department of Dental Informatics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Takeshita, Yohei (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Abdu, Zahrau Saleh (Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Bayero University Kano) ;
  • Ekuase, Edugie J. (Department of Chemistry and Forensic Sciences, Savannah State University) ;
  • Asaumi, Jun-ichi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences)
  • Received : 2018.10.08
  • Accepted : 2018.12.15
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of supernumerary teeth has been reported to be between 0.1% and 3.8%. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, clinical significance, and associated pathologies of fourth molars based on a retrospective study and a literature review. Materials and Methods: A 5-year retrospective prevalence study was conducted at the Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology of Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. The study involved extracting data from the digital records of patients from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017. The sampling frame included all patients who had panoramic radiographs, cone-beam computed tomography (CT), and multislice CT images during the period under review. Results: A total of 26,721 cases were reviewed and 87 fourth molars were identified. The prevalence of fourth molars in the 5-year study at Okayama was calculated as 0.32%. The mean age of patients with a fourth molar was 30.43 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1:0.98. The vast majority of cases were in the maxilla (92%) and had normal shapes(89.7%); furthermore, 82.8% of cases were unerupted. Conclusion: The prevalence of fourth molars in the study population was found to be 0.32%, and fourth molars occurred with approximately equal frequency in males and females. Fourth molars were more common in the maxilla and were predominantly unerupted and small.

Keywords

References

  1. Pippi R. Odontomas and supernumerary teeth: is there a common origin? Int J Med Sci 2014; 11: 1282-97. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.10501
  2. Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survery of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 244-54. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00366.x
  3. Patchett CL, Crawford PJ, Cameron AC, Stephens CD. The management of supernumerary teeth in childhood - a retrospective study of practice in Bristol Dental Hospital, England and Western Dental Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 259-65. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2001.00282.x
  4. Fernandez Montenegro P, Valmaseda Castellon E, Berini Aytes L, Gay Escoda C. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: E339-44.
  5. Harel-Raviv M, Eckler M, Raviv E, Gornitsky M. Fourth molars: a clinical study. Dent Update 1996; 23: 379-82.
  6. Kaya E, Gungor K, Demirel O, Ozuturk O. Prevalence and characteristics of non-syndromic distomolars: a retrospective study. J Investig Clin Dent 2015; 6: 282-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12108
  7. Dang HQ, Constantine S, Anderson PJ. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J 2017; 62: 161-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12443
  8. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80.
  9. Shahzad KM, Roth LE. Prevalence and management of fourth molars: a retrospective study and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 272-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.063
  10. Rahnama M, Szyszkowska A, Pulawska M, Szczerba-Gwordz J. A rare case of retained fourth molar teeth in maxilla and mandible. Case report. Curr Issues Pharm Med Sci 2014; 27: 118-20. https://doi.org/10.2478/cipms-2014-0028
  11. Grimanis GA, Kyriakides AT, Spyropoulos ND. A survey on supernumerary molars. Quintessence Int 1991; 2: 989-95.
  12. Ruprecht A, Batniji S, el-Neweihi E. Incidence of supernumerary teeth. Ann Dent 1984; 43: 18-21.
  13. McMenamin JP, Hart D. Paramolars: a case report. N Y J Dent 1985; 33: 209.
  14. Fisher SE. Maxillary sixth molars. Br Dent J 1982; 152: 356. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804814
  15. Piattelli A, Tete S. Bilateral maxillary and mandibular fourth molars. Report of a case. Acta Stomatol Belg 1992; 89: 57-60.
  16. Harris EF, Clark LL. An epidemiological study of hyperdontia in American blacks and whites. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 460-5. https://doi.org/10.2319/022807-104.1
  17. Batra P, Duggal R, Parkash H. Non-syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait. J Oral Pathol Med 2005; 34: 621-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2005.00271.x
  18. Dubuk AN, Selvig KA, Tellefsen G, Wikesjo UM. Atypically located paramolar. Report of a rare case. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 138-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00058.x

Cited by

  1. Odontoma associated with mandibular transmigrated canine in a geriatric patient: Second case report vol.37, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12495
  2. A case of impacted supernumerary teeth distal to the third molar teeth in the bilateral mandible vol.67, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5794/jjoms.67.532