아태비즈니스연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business)

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.153-171
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2233-5900(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-3934(eISSN)
강원대학교 경영경제연구소 (KNU The Institute of Management & Economy Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제4차 산업혁명관련 기업혁신활동 촉진·장애요인별 우선순위에 대한 탐색적 연구

An Exploratory Study on Priorities of Facilitators and Impediments of Firm Innovation Activities Regarding the Fourth Industrial Revolution

  • 투고 : 2019.08.30
  • 심사 : 2019.09.24
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This is an exploratory study on facilitators, impediments and their priorities of firm innovation activities regarding the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This study adopted an inductive method to explore the properties and contents of the facilitators and impediments. 10 main factors and 30 sub-factors (15 facilitators, 15 impediments) were extracted through the Delphi survey. The highest priority goes to the factor of executive-level officers' minds and future strategies. By examining the properties and contents of 15 facilitators and 15 impediments of innovation activities, this study notices that the most factors are related to the prior stage of innovation. It indicates that each firms' innovation activities regarding the Fourth Industrial Revolution is not about the managing problems in (or of) innovation process, but closely associated with the degree of whether they are willing to be engaged with their innovation activities of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In addition, this study proposes that the relationship between each firms' innovation activities on existing market/business and the new market/business regarding the Fourth Industrial Revolution can be predicted as a dynamic reverse one. 15 facilitators and 15 impediments can influence two types of innovation activities. Finally, this study suggests that through priorities of facilitators and impediments, leadership and future strategies, culture and organization, and (human) resource acquisition are the prioritized areas for a further study of innovation activities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Assink, M. (2006), "Inhibitors of Disruptive Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Model", European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610663587
  2. Banuls, V. A. and J. L. Salmeron (2008), "Foresighting Key Areas in the Information Technology Industry", Technovation, 28(3), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.006
  3. Barney, J. (1991), "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  4. Becker, M. C. (2004), "Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature", Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643-678. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026
  5. Bluland, K. and D. C. Mowery (2005), "Innovation Through Times". in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  6. Brem, A. and K. I. Voigt (2009), "Integration of Market Pull and Technology Push in the Corporate Front End and Innovation Management-Insights From the German Software Industry", Technovation, 29(5), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.003
  7. Burns, T. and G. M. Stalker (1961), The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
  8. Castells, M. (1997), End of Millennium: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
  9. Chen, C., Y. Chen, P. H. Hsu and E. J. Podolski (2016), "Be Nice to Your Innovators: Employee Treatment and Corporate Innovation Performance", Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.06.001
  10. Chung, Dong-Seop (2019), "A Study on the Psychological Ownership and Innovative Behavior: Focus on Job Satisfaction and Job Engagement", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business, 10(1), 25-38.
  11. Coyle, R. G. (2006), "Scenario Thinking and Strategic Modelling". in D. O. Faulkner and A. Campbell (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Strategy, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 308-349.
  12. D'Este, P., S. Iammarino, M. Savona and N. Von Tunzelmann (2012), "What Hampers Innovation? Revealed Barriers Versus Deterring Barriers", Research Policy, 41(2), 482-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.008
  13. Denti, L. and S. Hemlin (2012), "Leadership and Innovation in Organizations: A Systematic Review of Factors That Mediate or Moderate the Relationship", International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 124007-124027.
  14. Dosi, G. (1982), "Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change", Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  15. Drazin, R., M. A. Glynn and R. K. Kazanjian (1999), "Multilevel Theorizing About Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective", Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286-307. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893937
  16. Easterby-Smith, M., M. A. Lyles and M. A. Peteraf (2009), "Dynamic Capabilities: Current Debates and Future Directions", British Journal of Management, 20, S1-S8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00609.x
  17. Ena, O. V. and G. I. Abdrakhmanova (2017), "ICT Through the Prism of Critical Technologies", Foresight, 19(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-06-2016-0020
  18. Freeman, C. (1979), "The Determinants of Innovation: Market Demand, Technology, and the Response to Social Problems", Futures, 11(3), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(79)90110-1
  19. Freeman, C. (1984), "Prometheus Unbound", Futures, 16(5), 494-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(84)90080-6
  20. Friesl, M. and J. Larty (2013), "Replication of Routines in Organizations: Existing Literature and New Perspectives", International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00340.x
  21. Galia, F. and D. Legros (2004), "Complementarities Between Obstacles to Innovation: Evidence From France", Research Policy, 33(8), 1185-1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.004
  22. Georghiou, L., J. C. Harper, M. Keenaan, I. Miles and R. Popper (2008), The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  23. Gilbert, C. G. (2005), "Unbundling The Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity", Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803920
  24. Goransson, B. and J. Soderberg (2005), "Long Waves and Information Technologies-On the Transition Towards the Information Society", Technovation, 25(3), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00115-9
  25. Hansen, K. L. and H. Rush (1998), "Hotspots in Complex Product Systems: Emerging Issues in Innovation Management", Technovation, 18(8-9), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00027-3
  26. Hemlin, S. (2006), "Creative Knowledge Environments for Research Groups in Biotechnology: the Influence of Leadership and Organizational Support in Universities and Business Companies", Scientometrics, 67(1), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0053-9
  27. Herzlinger, R. E. (2006), "Why Innovation in Health Care Is So Hard", Harvard Business Review, 84(5), 58-66.
  28. Jeong, Da-Un and Byung-June Chun (2019), "The Mediation Effect of Trust and Communication on Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Innovative Behavior: Focused on Manufacturing Business", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business, 10(1), 25-38.
  29. Jiang, R., R. Kleer and F. T. Piller (2017), "Predicting the Future of Additive Manufacturing: A Delphi Study on Economic and Societal Implications of 3D Printing for 2030", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.006
  30. Jimenez-Jimenez, D. and R. Sanz-Valle (2005), "Innovation and Human Resource Management Fit: An Empirical Study", International Journal of Manpower, 26(4), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720510609555
  31. Kang, Jin-Won and Jong-Seok Kim (2018), Analysis of Environmental Factors on the Road to the 4th Industrial Revolution (KJS Group Issue Paper 2018-02), Daejeon, Korea: KJS Group. Available from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=E1065696
  32. Kim, Jong-Seok and Jin-Won Kang (2018), "The Analysis on Technological Changes of the 4th Industrial Revolution Using the Delphi Method", Journal of Social Science, 57(1), 205-234. https://doi.org/10.22418/jss.2018.6.57.1.205
  33. Kim, Jong-Seok and Jin-Won Kang (2019), "An Exploratory Study of Innovation Types and their Importances Under the 4th Industrial Revolution -Focusing on the Analysis of Delphi Results-", Technology Management, 4(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.33443/TM.2019.4.2.1
  34. Kim, Seok-Kwan, Byong-Sam Choi, Hee-Tae Yang, Pil-Seong Jang, Soo-Jeoung Sohn and Pyoung-Yol Jang (2017), "Technological Drivers and Industrial Impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (STEP Policy Report 17-13)", Sejong, Korea: STEPI. Available from http://www.stepi.re.kr/eng/app/eReport/list.jsp?cmsCd=CM0129
  35. Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1992), "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, And the Replication of Technology", Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  36. Lee, H. H. and T. T. Yang (2015), "Employee Goal Orientation, Work Unit Goal Orientation and Employee Creativity", Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12118
  37. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), "Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
  38. Lieberman, M. B. and D. B. Montgomery (1998), "First-Mover (dis) Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View", Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1111-1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1111::AID-SMJ21>3.0.CO;2-W
  39. Lim, Yong-Taeg and Ji-Moon Lee (2016), "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Commitment and Mediating Effect of Trust", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business, 7(2), 1-19.
  40. Linstone, H. A. (2002), "Corporate Planning, Forecasting, and the Long Wave", Futures, 34(3-4), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00047-7
  41. Linstone, H. A. and M. Turoff (2011), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  42. Linstone, H. A. and T. Devezas (2012), "Technological Innovation and the Long Wave Theory Revisited", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(2), 414-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.001
  43. Madrid-Guijarro, A., D. Garcia and H. V. Auken (2009), "Barriers to Innovation Among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs", Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x
  44. Miles, I., O. Saritas and A. Sokolov (2016), Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation, New York, NY: Springer.
  45. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1994), An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage Publications.
  46. Mowery, D. and N. Rosenberg (1979), "The Influence of Market Demand Upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies", Research Policy, 8(2), 102-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2
  47. Perez, C. (1985), "Microelectronics, Long Waves, and World Structural Change: New Perspectives for Developing Countries", World Development, 13(3), 441-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90140-8
  48. Peters, M., M. Schneider, T. Griesshaber and V. H. Hoffmann (2012), "The Impact of Technology-Push and Demand-Dull Policies on Technical Change-Does the Locus of Policies Matter?", Research Policy, 41(8), 1296-1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.004
  49. Priem, R. L., S. Li and J. C. Carr (2012), "Insights and New Directions From Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Research", Journal of Management, 38(1), 346-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429614
  50. Sandberg, B. and L. Aarikka-Stenroos (2014), "What Makes It So Difficult? A Systematic Review on Barriers to Radical Innovation", Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1293-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.003
  51. Schwab, K. (2017), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, London: Portfolio Penguin.
  52. Sekaran, U. and R. Bougie (2016), Research Methods for Business, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  53. Strobel, N. and J. Kratzer (2017), "Obstacles to Innovation for SMEs: Evidence from Germany", International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 1750030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961750030X
  54. Tang, Y., H. Sun, Q. Yao and Y. Wang (2014), "The Selection of Key Technologies by the Silicon Photovoltaic Industry Based on the Delphi Method and AHP (analytic hierarchy process): Case Study of China", Energy, 75, 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.003
  55. Teece, D. J. (2018), "Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities", Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  56. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen (1997), "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  57. Tidd, J. and J. Bessant (2013), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  58. Ulhoi, J. P. (2012), "Modes and Orders of Market Entry: Revisiting Innovation and Imitation Strategies", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.643559
  59. van Duijn, J. J. (1981), "Fluctuations in Innovations Over Time", Futures, 13(4), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(81)90143-9
  60. Wilenius, M. (2014), "Leadership in the Sixth Wave-Excursions Into the New Paradigm of the Kondratieff Cycle 2010-2050", European Journal of Futures Research, 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0036-7
  61. Woolthuis, R. K., L. Maureen and V. Gilsing (2005), "A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design", Technovation, 25(6), 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002

피인용 문헌

  1. 네트워크 활동 특성이 R&D 수행기업의 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구 : 관계자본, 산학연 연계, 비공식교류를 중심으로 vol.10, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.10.4.201912.49