DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Short-term changes of human acellular dermal matrix (Megaderm) in a mouse model

  • Kim, Yang Seok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital) ;
  • Na, Young Cheon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Hyun Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital) ;
  • Huh, Woo Hoe (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Ji Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.08
  • 심사 : 2018.12.17
  • 발행 : 2019.02.20

초록

Background: Physicians tend to overcorrect when applying the acellular dermal matrix for reconstructive option because of volume decrement problem after absorption comparing with initial volume. However, there are no studies on the exact volume decrement and absorption rate with commercial products in South Korea. To figure out absorption rate of acellular dermal matrix product in South Korea (Megaderm), authors designed this experiment. Methods: Nine mice were used and randomly divided into three groups by the time with sacrificing. The implant (Megaderm) was tailored to fit a cuboid form ($1.0cm{\times}1.0cm$ in length and width and 2.0 mm in thickness). A skin incision was made at anterior chest with blade #15 scalpel with exposing the pectoralis major muscle. As hydrated Megaderm was located upon the pectoralis major muscle, the skin was sutured with Ethilon #5-0. After the surgical procedure, each animal group was sacrificed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, for biopsies and histological analysis of the implants. All samples were stained with routine hematoxylin and eosin staining and Masson's trichrome staining and the thickness were measured. A measurements were analyzed using Friedman test. Statistically, the correlation between thicknesses of Megaderm before and after implantation was analyzed. Results: After sacrificing the animal groups at postoperative 4, 8, 12 weeks, the mean tissue thickness values were $2.10{\pm}1.03mm$, $2.17{\pm}0.21mm$, and $2.40{\pm}0.20mm$ (p= 0.368), respectively. The remaining ratios after absorption comparing with after initial hydrated Megaderm were 82.7%, 85.4%, and 94.5%, respectively. In histopathological findings, neovascularization and density of collagenous fiber was increased with time. Conclusion: Author's hypothesis was absorption rate of implant would be increased over time. But in this experiment, there is no statistical significance between mean absorption thickness of implant and the time (p= 0.368). Also it can be affected by graft site, blood supply, and animals that were used in the experiment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lew DH, Kim SM, Ahn SJ, Park BY. Histomorphometric study of tissue reaction of Gore-tex implant in the rat model. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;27:247-52.
  2. Medalie DA, Eming SA, Tompkins RG, Yarmush ML, Krueger GG, Morgan JR. Evaluation of human skin reconstituted from composite grafts of cultured keratinocytes and human acellular dermis transplanted to athymic mice. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 107:121-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12298363
  3. Bottino MC, Jose MV, Thomas V, Dean DR, Janowski GM. Freeze-dried acellular dermal matrix graft: effects of rehydration on physical, chemical, and mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2009;25:1109-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.007
  4. Kim HT, Ahn ST, Park JG. Absorption Rates of various-thickness human acellular dermal grafts(SureDerm (R)). J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;30:224-30.
  5. Hong JS, Kim WS, Yu YI, Kim HK. Comparison of survival of SureDerm(R), Permacol(R) graft in mouse. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;34:685-90.
  6. Park DS, Kim HK, Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee TJ. Comparison of survival of human dermis, AlloDerm and Terudermis graft in nude mous. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;29:188-97.
  7. Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA, McCormick SA, Cocker R, Parker A. Evaluation of acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm) sheet for soft tissue augmentation: a 1-year follow-up of clinical observations and histological findings. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:101-3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.3.2.101
  8. Nicolle FV, Matti BA, Scamp T. Dermal and facial autografts in facial aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1992;16:219-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190067
  9. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 1995;21:243-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(95)93866-I
  10. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (Allo- Derm). Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:514-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961
  11. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:232-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000168527.52472.3c
  12. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:22-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000185460.31188.c1
  13. Sherris DA, Oriel BS. Human acellular dermal matrix grafts for rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31(7 Suppl):95S-100S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11418200
  14. Askari M, Cohen MJ, Grossman PH, Kulber DA. The use of acellular dermal matrix in release of burn contracture scars in the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1593-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820a6511
  15. Gore DC. Utility of acellular allograft dermis in the care of elderly burn patients. J Surg Res 2005;125:37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.11.032
  16. Rennekampff HO, Pfau M, Schaller HE. Acellular allograft dermal matrix: immediate or delayed epidermal coverage? Burns 2002;28:100-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(01)00075-4
  17. Adetayo OA, Salcedo SE, Bahjri K, Gupta SC. A meta-analysis of outcomes using acellular dermal matrix in breast and abdominal wall reconstructions: event rates and risk factors predictive of complications. Ann Plast Surg 2016;77:e31-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822afae5
  18. Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, Hunt J, Monafo W, Heimbach D, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996;17:124-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199603000-00006
  19. Lee DH, Han DW, Baik BS. Histologic changes of various artificial dermis graft in rabbit. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;27:550-61.
  20. Lee DW, Lee MC, Roh H, Lee WJ. Multilayered implantation using acellular dermal matrix into nude mice. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2014;25:2669-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5281-6
  21. Na YC, Kang YS, Ryu BS, Yang JY. Recontruction of soft tissue defect of feet and legs using Alloderm. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;26:996-1000.
  22. Gryskiewicz JM. Dorsal Augmentation with AlloDerm. Semin Plast Surg 2008;22:90-103. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063568
  23. Lee KN, Koh KS. Acellular human dermis, a good option for correcting the free border deficiency in secondary cleft lip deformity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:356-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.09.035
  24. Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dent 2001;10:49-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200101000-00016
  25. Tobin HA, Karas ND. Lip augmentation using an Alloderm graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:722-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90805-9

피인용 문헌

  1. Cryptotia recurrence lowering technique with additional acellular dermal matrix graft vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00269
  2. Usefulness of Allogenic Acellular Dermal Matrix for Prevention of Scalp Depression after Burr Hole Trephination vol.16, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2020.16.e34