An Understanding of Professors' Performance of Teaching in College of Science and Engineering: A Case Study Using the CHAT

이공 계열 교수의 강의 실행에 대한 이해: 문화역사적 활동이론(CHAT)을 활용한 사례연구

  • Song, Nayoon (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, JaeYoung (Department of Chemistry Education, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.15
  • Accepted : 2018.12.22
  • Published : 2019.01.31

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed professors' performance of teaching in college of science and engineering from the perspective of the CHAT. Two professors volunteered to participate in this study. Their syllabi were collected before the lectures, and their lectures were observed and videotaped. Semi-structured interviews were conducted before and after their lectures. The CHAT components were classified into 'subjects', 'objects', 'rules', 'communities', 'division of labor', and 'tools'. We extracted the content of six CHAT components from the data and constructed the analysis framework based on the extracted contents. The analyses of the results revealed that both professors had difficulties due to the contradictions among the components of subject, object, rules, and community in the activity system. Both professors used various strategies to relieve the contradiction related to students' ability, such as inviting students to participate in their lecture. However the extent of providing opportunities to students to participate was different between two professors. Meanwhile, both professors preferred to continue their own strategies, because they observed positive changes in students' learning. In other words, the success experiences of two professors influenced their performances of teaching. We discussed some suggestions to improve the quality of the lecture in the college of science and engineering.

Keywords

References

  1. 고장완.박수미.유현숙(2014). 대학생의 학습성과와 대학특성 및 학습과정 변인 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 한국교육, 41(1), 167-195.
  2. 권성연.신소영.김지심(2011). 대학수업의 질 제고를 위한 학습자중심교육의 중요도와 실행도 분석: 교수들의 인식을 중심으로. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(1), 51-78.
  3. 길양숙(2003). 교수의 수업운영 실태에 관한 의견 분석. 한국교원교육연구, 20(1), 33-56.
  4. 길양숙(2011). 대학의 수업방법과 교수행동에 나타나는 특징. 한국교원교육연구, 28(4), 405-428.
  5. 김남수.이혁규(2012). 문화역사 활동이론을 통한 1년차 서울형 혁신학교의 수업 혁신 활동의 이해. 열린교육연구, 20(4), 357-382.
  6. 김진수.최유현.김수경(2008). 공과대학 교수들의 공학교육 연수실태와 교육요구 분석. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2008.11.2.50
  7. 김태완 외(2006). 대학에서의 인문학 수업에 대한 교수와 학생의 우수 인문학 강의 사례 분석. 교육과학연구, 37(1), 101-128.
  8. 민혜리(2016). 수업에 대한 교수의 자기평가와 학생평가의 비교를 통한 공과대학 수업개선방안 연구. 공학교육연구, 19(3), 35-43.
  9. 민혜리.홍성연(2009). 공과대학 학생들의 수업에 대한 요구와 만족도에 근거한 공과대학 수업개선 방안 탐색. 공학교육연구, 12(4), 38-45.
  10. 신영화.김동익.홍경선(2012). 공학 수업 동영상 분석을 통한 교수전략 활용 실태. 공학교육연구, 15(6), 1-10.
  11. 안지혜(2014). 좋은 대학수업의 특성에 대한 문화기술적 사례 연구. 열린교육연구, 22(1), 163-191.
  12. 이석열(2014). 마이크로티칭 적용에서 나타난 신임교수의 수업행위 분석. 교육종합연구, 12(3), 105-126.
  13. 이용숙(2011). '우수수업 상' 수상 교수의 수업유형과 특성에 대한 문화기술적 연구. 교육방법연구, 23(1), 175-211. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2011.23.1.175
  14. 장지영.이현주(2016). 공과대학 학생들이 갖추어야 할 실행능력에 대한 공학 교수자들의 인식 및 교수활동 실태. 공학교육연구, 19(4), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2016.19.4.3
  15. 정은이(2010). 대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 교수자와 학습자의 인식. 교육방법연구, 22(3), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2010.22.3.25
  16. 최숙영.김민환.노태희(2015). 중등 과학교사의 융합인재교육(STEAM) 실행에 대한 문화역사적 활동이론(CHAT) 측면에서의 이해. 한국과학교육학회지, 35(6), 949-959. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.6.0949
  17. 한문정.양찬호.노태희(2014). 교사의 과학관 학습 실행에 대한 이해: CHAT를 활용한 사례연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 34(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.1.1.0033
  18. 홍성연(2010). 대학 강의 개선을 위한 수업컨설팅 사례 분석. 아시아교육연구, 11(3), 97-127.
  19. Anderson, W. A. et al.(2011). Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science, 331 (6014), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198280
  20. Baeten, M. et al.(2010). Using student-centred learning environment to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5 (3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
  21. Beatty, I. D. & Feldman, A.(2012). Viewing teacher transformation through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT). Education as Change, 16 (2), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2012.745756
  22. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P.(2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47 (1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
  23. Eick, C. J. & Reed, C. J.(2002). What makes an inquiry‐oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86 (3), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10020
  24. Engestrom, Y.(1987). Learning by expanding: An activitytheoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
  25. Engestrom, Y.(2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14 (1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  26. Engestrom, Y. & Sannino, A.(2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5 (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
  27. Fraser, S. P.(2016). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education. Research in Science Education, 46 (1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9459-1
  28. Freeman, S. et al.(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  29. Kaatrakoski, H., Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N.(2017). Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice. Higher Education, 74 (4), 599-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z
  30. Lajoie, S. P. et al.(2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29 (2), 155-186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003996000775
  31. Robert, J. & Carlsen, W. S.(2017). Teaching and research at a large university: Case studies of science professors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54 (7), 937-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21392
  32. Roth, W. -M. & Tobin, K.(2002). Redesigning an "urban" teacher education program: An activity theory perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9 (2), 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_03
  33. Roth, W. -M., Lee, Y. J., & Hsu, P. L.(2009). A tool for changing the world: Possibilities of cultural-historical activity theory to reinvigorate science education. Studies in Science Education, 45 (2), 131-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142269
  34. Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., & Brooks, J. S.(2009). Becoming a member of a school community while working toward science education reform: Teacher induction from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) perspective. Science Education, 93 (6), 996-1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20342
  35. Smith, L. K.(2005). The impact of early life history on teachers' beliefs: in-school and out-of-school experiences as learners and knowers of science. Teachers and teaching, 11 (1), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337075
  36. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Technique and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  37. Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. & Haudenschild, M. T.(2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 (3), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.014