DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ISPH 기법을 이용한 고유동 콘크리트의 유동 해석

Flow Simulation of High Flow Concrete using Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (ISPH) Method

  • Kim, Sang-Sin (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Chung, Chul-Woo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Joon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.02
  • 심사 : 2018.11.27
  • 발행 : 2019.02.20

초록

본 연구에서는 비압축성 Navier-Stokes 방정식을 적용한 ISPH 기법을 이용하여 3차원 유동 수치해석 모델을 개발하였다. 수치해석을 위해 MATLAB을 사용하여 ISPH 프로그램을 구현하였다. ISPH의 커널 함수로 piecewise cubic spline 함수를 사용하였다. 벽 경계조건으로 고정 가상 입자를 사용하였으며, 가상 밀도를 적용하여 자유 표면 경계 부근의 입자들을 결정하였다. 수치해석 모델과 코드의 정도를 확인하기 위해 $T_{500}$ 시험, 슬럼프 플로우 시험, L-box 시험의 수치해석 결과와 실험 결과를 비교하였다. 수치해석 결과 고유동 콘크리트의 점성계수 및 항복응력 변화에 따른 유동 현상의 특성을 잘 묘사하였으며, 기존의 실험값과 비교적 잘 일치함을 확인할 수 있었다.

A three-dimensional flow simulation model for high flow concrete was developed using Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (ISPH), which can solved Navier-Stokes equation with the assumption of a fluid to be incompressible. For the simulation, a computer program code for ISPH was implemented with MATALB programming code. A piecewise cubic spline function was used for the kernel function of ISPH. Projetion method was used to calculate the velocity and pressure of particles as a function of time. Fixed ghost particle was used for wall boundary condition. Free surface boundaries were determined by using virtual density of particles. In order to validate the model and the code, the simulation results of slump flow test, $T_{500}$ test and L-box test were compared with experimental ones. The simulation results were well matched with the experimental results. The simulation described successfully the characteristics of the flow phenomenon according to the change of the viscosity and yield stress of high flow concrete.

키워드

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Support domain of smoothing function

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Truncation of the kernel function near wall

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Free surface boundary condition

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Dimension of T500 and slump flow test

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Dimension of L-box test

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6. Modeling by ISPH (slump cone flow test)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 7. Simulated T500

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0008.png 이미지

Figure 8. Simulated slump flow

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0009.png 이미지

Figure 9. Modeling by ISPH (L-box test)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_f0010.png 이미지

Figure 10. Simulated L-box

Table 1. Mix proportion of high flow concrete[16]

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Summary of the result for the different test[16]

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. T500 and Slump flow prediction

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. L-box prediction

GCSGBX_2019_v19n1_39_t0004.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Okamura H, Ouchi M. Self-compacting concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. 2003 Jan;1(1):5-15. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.1.5
  2. Liptak BG. Instrument Engineers' Handbook. 4th ed. Taylor, Francis; 2003. Chapter 8. Rheometers; p. 1628-36.
  3. Aggarwal P, Siddique R, Aggarwal Y, Gupta S. Self-compacting concrete-procedure for mix design. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies. 2008 Jun;7(12):15-24.
  4. Cho CG, Kim WJ, Yeol Choi. Model for flow analysis of fresh concrete using particle method with visco-plastic flow formulation. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2008 Jun;20(3):317-23. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2008.20.3.317
  5. Kim JH, Park M. Visualization of concrete slump flow using the kinect sensor. Sensors. 2018 Mar;18(3):771-1 https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030771
  6. He ZC, Liu GR., Zhong ZH, Zhang GY, Cheng AG, Coupled analysis of 3D structural-acoustic problems using the edge-based smoothed finite element method/finite element method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 2010 Dec;46(12):1114-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.08.003
  7. Li ZC, Wang S. The finite volume method and application in combinations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 1999 Jun;106(1):21-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00051-5
  8. Ekvall N. Experiences in the pricing of trivariate contingent claims with finite difference methods on a massively parallel computer. Computational Economics. 1994 Jun;7(2):63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299567
  9. Monaghan JJ. An introduction to SPH. Computer Physics Communications. 1988 Jan;48(1):89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(88)90026-4
  10. Koshizuka S, Oka Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 1996 May;123(3):421-34. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24205
  11. Kwon JH. Cho HC. Computational modeling of two phase interaction in solid-liquid flows using a coupled sph-dem model. Journal of the Korean society for geosystem engineering. 2010 Aug;47(2):119-26.
  12. Kim CH, Lee YG, Jeong KL. A study on the numerical simulation method of two-dimensional incompressible fluid flows using ISPH method. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 2011 Dec;48(6):560-8. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2011.48.6.560
  13. Alyhya W. S, Kulasegaram S, Karihaloo, B. L. Simulation of the flow of self-compacting concrete in the v-funnel by SPH. Cement and Concrete Research. 2017 Oct;100:47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.05.021
  14. Deeb R, Kulasegaram S, Karihaloo BL. 3D modelling of the flow of self-compacting concrete with or without steel fibres Part I: slump flow test. Computational Particle Mechanics. 2014 Dec;1(4):373-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-014-0002-y
  15. Bakti FP, Kim MH, Kim KS, Park JC. Comparative study of standard wc-sph and mps solvers for free-surface academic problems. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering. 2016 Sep;26(3):235-43. https://doi.org/10.17736/ijope.2016.pf17
  16. Cauberg N, Dieryck V, Desmyter J. Rheology of self-compacting concrete validation of empirical test methods. Belgian Building Reserch Institute. 2005 Nov; 765-73.
  17. Monaghan JJ. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics. 1992 Sep;30(1):543-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551
  18. Vola D, Babik F. On a numerical strategy to compute gravity currents of non-newtonian fluids. Journal of Computational Physics. 2004 Dec;201(2):397-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.05.019
  19. Zhu H, Martys NS, Ferraris C, De Kee D. A numerical study of the flow of bingham-like fluids in two-dimensional vane and cylinder rheometers using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics(SPH) based method. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2010 Apr;165(7):362-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.01.012
  20. Yeylaghi S, Moa B, Oshkai P, Buckham B, Crawford C. ISPH modelling of an oscillating wave surge converter using an openMP-based parallel approach. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy. 2016 Mar;2(3):301-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-016-0053-7
  21. Adami S, Hu XY, Adams NA. A generalized wall boundary condition for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics. 2012 Aug;231(21):7057-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.05.005
  22. European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems (EFNARC). Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. European Federation of National Associations Representing producers and applicators of specialist building products for Concrete (EFNARC), 2002. 32 p.