DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Standardization on the Flight Controller Mode in Remotely Piloted Aircraft Drone : Focused on Drone Controller Mode Preference

원격조종항공기 드론 조종기모드 표준화 연구 : 드론 조종기모드 선호도를 중심으로

  • Park, Wontae (Cheongju University Aeronautical Science & Flight Operation)
  • Received : 2019.10.06
  • Accepted : 2019.11.22
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) controls as a type of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) is growing rapidly and its flight controller stick disposition is required standardization. We should standardize RPA drone flight control disposition because the flight pilot of RPA is hard to be trained so the flight controller stick differences impairs safety and wastes time and effort of flight controller industry. So this study researches the on-going standardization of RPA drone flight control disposition in Korea and foreign countries. Also this paper analyzes and researches of expert about RPA drone flight controller function and application of flight control mode. I accomplished expert research about standardization plan of unmanned flight control mode and confirm the necessity. Nowadays mode1 and 2 are mostly used in Korea so I carried out preference investigation for two modes. There were 4 preferences choices of RPA drone control mode necessity (importance) and recommendation of standardization modes. They answered that necessity of standardization is important considering pilot training, flight safety and positive development of drone industry. The result of standardization mode preference is that they prefer mode 2 (drone maker 86%, training facilities and research facilities 58%, government bureau 60%). Overall preference result shows that mode 1 24%, mode 1&2 16%, mode 2 60%. So they preferred mode 2 by 60%. The differences between two modes are the direction of throttle and pitch. Direction of throttle and pitch operate opposite way. They prefer mode 2 because mode 2 has similarities of manned flight control mode. Significance of this study is that it showed the necessity of standardization and flight control preference in a quantitative way. It will help drone standardization in related industries and development direction near future.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, S.H., A study on the assessment of situation awareness of helicopter pilots, [Thesis Doctorate], [Gyeonggi-do, Korea] : Korea Aerospace University, 2011, pp. 85-96.
  2. Defence acquisition program administration regulation No2017-3, Notification of the military aircraft standard airworthiness certificate criteria, part 3, 2017.
  3. Defence acquisition program administration, Republic of Korea(ROK) law No14116, law of the military aircraft standard airworthiness certificate, 2017.
  4. Electric and telecommunication research institute, design and demonstration of the UTM(UAS Traffic Management) for safe operation of unmanned aerial vehicles, 2016, p. 6, pp. 64-75.
  5. ICAO, Doc 10019 Manual on remotely piloted aircraft systems, 2017.
  6. KAIST(Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology), "Flight safety regulation development and integrated operation demonstration for civil RPAS", 2017.
  7. Korea drone industry promotion association, A study on drone standardization method, 2016, pp. 71-142.
  8. Korea industrial standards commission, "KS(Korea Standard) W 9000" Unmanned aircraft system, Classification and terminology, 2016, Vol. 1, p. 13.
  9. Lim et al., A study on the legal regulation of the drone industry : Focused on the law of the unmanned flying device, Korea Research Association for Private Investigation Drones, 2018, pp. 53-82.
  10. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-356, Criteria of the aircraft production certificate and product type approval, 2017.
  11. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-360, Airplane technical criteria, part 1, 2017.
  12. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-361, Criteria of the aircraft technical standard product type approval, 2017.
  13. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, Republic of Korea(ROK) law No. 14114, Civil aeronautical safety law, 2017.
  14. Park, W.T., A study on the aptitude test of remotely piloted aircraft pilots(focused on selection of aptitude test items), Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical Science and Flight Operation, 2015, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 30-40.
  15. Yoo et al., A strategy on standardization of RPAS airworthiness certification, The Journal of Korea Navigation Institute, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-12.