한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사서의 문헌정보학분야 학술논문 출판 활동 현황 - 『한국비블리아학회지』를 중심으로 -

Librarians' Contribution for Publishing in LIS Journal: In the case of Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • 신은자 (세종대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.18
  • 심사 : 2019.12.09
  • 발행 : 2019.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

실용성을 강조하는 여타 학문 분야처럼 문헌정보학은 실무자인 사서의 연구 활동과 학술논문 출판에 관심이 많다. 그럼에도 불구하고 이를 직접 다룬 국내 연구는 매우 드물다. 이 연구는 사서의 국내 학술논문 출판 데이터를 수집하여 현황을 분석하고, 사서의 학술논문 출판 활성화 방안을 모색하는데 연구의 초점을 맞추었다. 2014년부터 2018년까지 한국비블리아학회지에 수록된 사서 저자의 논문을 다각적으로 분석하였고, 출판한 사서의 특성도 파악하였다. 분석결과 학술지 저자 전체에서 사서의 비중은 15.56%로 높지 않았다. 다만 사서 저자의 논문수 추이가 안정세였고, 공저 논문 가운데 사서가 주저자인 경우가 많다는 점은 고무적이었다. 활발한 출판을 보이는 사서는 공공 도서관과 학교 도서관 사서였고, 대학 도서관 사서는 다소 뒤져 있었으며, 지도교수와 공저하는 대학원 재학 사서도 있었다. 사서의 학술논문 출판을 활성화하는 데는 사서 개인의 노력뿐 아니라 소속 기관의 인식 개선과 적극적인 지원이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 향후 사서와 도서관 모두 학술논문 출판의 중요성을 인지하고, 업무 시간의 탄력 적용, 보상, 지원 등 구체적인 방안을 마련해 실천함으로써, 사서의 귀중한 실무 경험이 학술논문으로 출판되고 이를 타 연구자 및 사서가 용이하게 공유할 수 있도록 해야 할 것이다.

In addition to emphasizing practicality, as in some academic disciplines, LIS is also interested in the research activities and journal publishing of librarians. Despite the high interest, there are few Korean studies on librarian authors' publishing. This study focuses on analyzing the status of librarians' publishing and finding ways to activate their journal publishing. This study analyzed the papers of the librarian authors published from 2014 to 2018 in Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science and identified the characteristics of librarians who are publishing. As a result, librarians accounted for 15.56% of all authors. However, it is encouraging that the number of librarians' authorship stabilized, and that many librarians are the main authors. Librarians who were energetically publishing were public or school librarians, and academic librarians were slightly behind. There were graduate student librarians who collaborated with the advisor. In order to increase the librarian's publishing, it seemed to be necessary to improve not only the librarian's efforts but also the recognition and assistance of his/her library. Both the librarian and his/her library should be aware of the importance of publishing the journals, and should establish concrete plans such as resilience, compensation, and support. In this way, the librarian's valuable practical experience will be published in research papers and widely shared among researchers and practitioners.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang, Mi-Hee and Jeong-Hyen Kim. 2014. "A Study on Research Trends of Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(4): 457-482. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.4.201412.457
  2. Park, Ja-Hyun and Min Song. 2013. "A Study on the Research Trends in Library & Information Science in Korea using Topic Modeling." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1): 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
  3. Seo, Eun-Gyoung, Won-Kyung Lee, Eun-Kyung Park, and Ock-Seong Lee. 2015. "Informetric Analysis of Research Trends in The Journal of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science." Journal of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.315
  4. Sohn, Jung-Pyo. 2003. "An Analytical Study on Research Trends of Library and Information Science in Korea: 1957-2002." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 34(3): 9-32.
  5. Oh, Se-Hoon and Too-Young Lee. 2005. "Research Trends of Information Science in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(1): 167-189. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.1.167
  6. Chung, Jae-Young and Jin-Hee Park. 2011. "Analysis of the Trends in the Field Studies of Library and Information Science in Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2): 171-191. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.171
  7. Choi, Hyung Wook, Ye-Jin Choi, and So-Yeon Nam. 2018. "Time Series Analysis of Intellectual Structure and Research Trend Changes in the Field of Library and Information Science: 2003 to 2017." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2): 89-114. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.089
  8. Pyo, Soon-Hee. 2010. "The Study on the Applying Methods for EBLIP in Korean Librarianship." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(3): 219-239. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.219
  9. Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science. 2019. [online]. [cited 2019.7.1]. .
  10. Borrego, A., J. Ardanuy, and C. Urbano. 2018. "Librarians as Research Partners: Their Contribution to the Scholarly Endeavour Beyond Library and Information Science." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(5): 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.012
  11. Brown, J. M. 2001. "Time and the Academic Librarian." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 1(1): 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2001.0009
  12. Buttlar, L. 1991. "Analyzing the Library Periodical Literature: Content and Authorship." College & Research Libraries, 52(1): 38-53. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_52_01_38
  13. Chang, Y. W. 2015. "Librarians' Contribution to Open Access Journal Publishing in Library and Information Science from the Perspective of Authorship." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5): 660-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.006
  14. Fox, D. 2007. "Finding Time for Scholarship: a Survey of Canadian Research University Librarians." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(4): 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0041
  15. Frandsen, T. F. and J. Nicolaisen. 2010. "What is in a Name? Credit Assignment Practices in Different Disciplines." Journal of Informetrics, 4(4): 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010
  16. Hart, R. L. 2000. "Collaborative Publication by University Librarians: an Exploratory Study." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(2): 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(99)00145-7
  17. Hoggan, D. B. 2003. "Faculty Status for Librarians in Higher Education." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(3): 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0060
  18. Jacobs, H. L. and S. A. Berg. 2013. "By Librarians, for Librarians: Building a Strengths-based Institute to Develop Librarians' Research Culture in Canadian Academic Libraries." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3): 227-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.02.003
  19. Silva, E., Q. Galbraith, and M. Groesbeck. 2017. "Academic Librarians' Changing Perceptions of Faculty Status and Tenure." College & Research Libraries, 78(4): 428-441. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.4.428
  20. Welch, J. M. and F. L. Mozenter. 2006. "Loosening the Ties that Bind: Academic Librarians and Tenure." College & Research Libraries, 67(2): 164-176. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.67.2.164
  21. Wiberley Jr, S. E., J. M. Hurd, and A. C. Weller. 2006. "Publication Patterns of US Academic Librarians from 1998 to 2002." College & Research Libraries, 67(3): 205-216. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.67.3.205
  22. Wilkinson, Z. 2013. "Rock around the (tenure) Clock: Research Strategies for New Academic Librarians." New Library World, 114(1/2): 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801311291965