한국BIM학회 논문집 (Journal of KIBIM)

  • 제9권4호
  • /
  • Pages.1-9
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-1697(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1697(eISSN)
한국BIM학회 (Korean Institute of Building Information Modeling)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

설계검토를 위한 가상현실·증강현실 기술의 활용 효과 비교 분석

Comparative Analysis of Visual Presentation and User Acceptability of Virtual/Augmented Reality Application for Architectural Design Review

  • Lee, Jin-Gang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Building and Real Estate) ;
  • Choi, Min-Ji ;
  • Lim, Yun-Ji (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Building and Real Estate) ;
  • Seo, Joon-Oh (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Building and Real Estate)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.15
  • 심사 : 2019.10.15
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Visualized information platforms through building information modeling (BIM) such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) improves the efficiency of architectural information exchange. Despite that, less effort has been directed to evaluate the effectiveness of different BIM visualization platforms for architectural design review. This study fills these gaps and compares three BIM visualization tools for reviewing diverse architectural review factors and technology acceptance degree. Three main BIM visualization tools, which are desktop-based, virtual reality-based and augmented reality-based, were employed and different architectural review factors and user's technology acceptance degree was measured. As a result, VR and AR environment showed better visual presentation than desktop environment during design review. In terms of the technology acceptance level, VR and AR environments have received higher ratings compared to desktop environments. The detailed findings provide guidelines for participants and researchers involved in design review process to selectively adopt VR and AR system to various architectural design review components.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abu-Dalbouh, H. M. (2013). A questionnaire approach based on the technology acceptance model for mobile tracking on patient progress applications. Journal of Computer Science, 9(6), pp. 763-770. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.763.770
  2. Aromaa, S., V n nen, K. (2016). Suitability of virtual p rototypes to suppo rt human facto rs/e rgonomics evaluation during the design. Applied ergonomics, 56, pp. 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.015
  3. Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and management in engineering, 11(3), pp. 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
  4. Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Reynard, G., Brown, C., Koleva, B. (1998). Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. ACM Transactions on computer-human interaction (TOCHI), 5(3), pp. 185-223. https://doi.org/10.1145/292834.292836
  5. Blumel, E., Strassburger, S., Sturek, R., Kimura, I. (2004). Pragmatic approach to apply virtual reality technology in accelerating a product life cycle. In Proc. of International Conference INNOVATIONS, pp. 199-207.
  6. Bouchlaghem, D., Shang, H., Whyte, J., Ganah, A. (2005). Visualization in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC). Automation in construction, 14(3), pp. 287-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.012
  7. Broll, W., Lindt, I., Ohlenburg, J., Wittk mper, M., Yuan, C., Novotny, T., Strothmann, A. (2004). Arthur: A collaborative augmented environment for architectural design and urban planning. JVRB-Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 1(1).
  8. CRC Construction Innovation. (2007). Adopting BIM for facilities management: Solutions for managing the Sydney Opera House, Cooperative Research Center for Construction Innovation, Brisbane, Australia.
  9. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J., DeFanti, T. A. (1993). Surround-screen projection based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, pp. 135-142.
  10. Drettakis, G., Roussou, M., Reche, A., Tsingos, N. (2007). Design and evaluation of a real-world virtual environment for architecture and urban planning. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(3), pp. 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.3.318
  11. East, E., Kirby, J., Perez, G. (2004). Improved Design Review through Web Collaboration. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(2), pp. 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:2(51)
  12. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Hart, S. G., Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. North-Holland, 52, pp. 139-183.
  14. Huang, T., Kong, C. W., Guo, H., Baldwin, A., Li, H. (2007). A virtual prototyping system for simulating construction processes. Automation in construction, 16(5), pp. 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.09.007
  15. Issa, R. R. (2000). Virtual Reality: A solution to seamless technology integration in the AEC industry. In Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World. pp. 1007-1013.
  16. Keshavarz, B., Stelzmann, D., Paillard, A., Hecht, H. (2015). Visually induced motion sickness can be alleviated by pleasant odors. Experimental brain research, 233(5), pp. 1353-1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4209-9
  17. Kim, M., Wang, X., Love, P., Li, H., Kang, S. C. (2013). Virtual reality for the built environment: a critical review of recent advances. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 18(2013), pp. 279-305.
  18. Lee, N., Kim, Y. (2018). A Conceptual Framework for Effective Communication in Construction Management: Information Processing and Visual Communication. In Construction Research Congress 2018, pp. 531-541.
  19. Majumdar, T., Fischer, M. A., Schwegler, B. R. (2006). Conceptual design review with a virtual reality mock-up model. In Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, pp. 2902-2911.
  20. Milgram, P., Takemura, H. (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. SPIE: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies.
  21. Ormerod, M., Aouad, G. (1997). The need for matching visualisation techniques to client understanding in the UK construction industry. Information Visualization, 1997. Proceedings. 1997 IEEE Conference on, pp. 322-328.
  22. Park, C. S., Lee, D. Y., Kwon, O. S., Wang, X. (2013). A framework for proactive construction defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology based data collection template. Automation in Construction, 33, pp. 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.010
  23. Sharples, S., Cobb, S., Moody, A., Wilson, J. R. (2008). Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays, 29(2), pp. 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005
  24. Soibelman, L., Liu, L. Y., Kirby, J. G., East, E. W., Caldas, C. H., Lin, K. Y. (2003). Design review checking system with corporate lessons learned. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5), pp. 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(475)
  25. Spillinger, R., Staff, N. (2000). Adding value to the facility acquisition process best practices for reviewing facility designs (Technical report (Federal Facilities Council) ; #139). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  26. Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., Mou, W. (2003). Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp. 73-80.
  27. Tonn, C., Donath, D., Petzold, F. (2007). Simulating the atmosphere of spaces. In 25th eCAADe Conference Proceedings. Frankfurt, Germany, pp. 169-176.
  28. Van Krevelen, D. W. F., Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International journal of virtual reality, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.20870/IJVR.2010.9.2.2767
  29. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), pp. 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  30. Waly, A. F., Thabet, W. Y. (2003). A virtual construction environment for preconstruction planning. Automation in construction, 12(2), pp. 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00047-X
  31. Wang, X., Dunston, P. S. (2008). User perspectives on mixed reality tabletop visualization for face-to-face collaborative design review. Automation in construction, 17(4), pp. 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.07.002
  32. Wang, X., Dunston, P. S. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of mixed reality-based virtual environments in collaborative design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 41(3), pp. 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2093573
  33. Wang, X., Kim, M. J. (2009). Exploring presence and performance in mixed realitybased design space. In Mixed reality in architecture, design and construction. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 75-90.
  34. Wang, X., Kim, M. J., Love, P. E., Kang, S. C. (2013). Augmented Reality in built environment: Classification and implications for future research. Automation in Construction, 32, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.021
  35. Witmer, B. G., Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), pp. 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686