References
- Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18-32.
- Ashcroft, L. & Watts, C. (2004). Change implications related to electronic educational resources. Online Information Review, 28(4), 284-291.
- Brunet, D. P., Bates, M. L., Gallo, J. R., & Strother, E. A. (2011). Incoming dental students' expectations and acceptance of an electronic textbook program. Journal of Dental Education, 75(5), 646-652.
- Clark, D. T. (2009). Lending Kindle e-book readers: first results from the Texas A&M University project. Collection Building, 28(4), 146-149.
- Daniel, D.B. and Woody, W.D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Comput. Educ., 62, 18-23.
- Dennis, A. R., Abaci, S., Morrone, A.S., Morrone, A. S., Plaskoff, J., & McNamara, K. O. (2016). Effects of e-textbook instructor annotations on learner performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(2), 221-235.
- Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35, 1297-1326.
- Dobler, E. (2015). E-textbooks. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58, 482-491.
- Dundar, H. & Akcayir, M. (2012). Tablet vs. paper: the effect on learners' reading performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 441-450.
- Falc, E. O. (2013). An assessment of college students' attitudes towards using an online e-textbook. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 9, 1-12.
- Gu, X., W, B., & Xu, X. (2015). Design, development, and learning in e-Textbooks: what we learned and where we are going. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 25-41.
- Hao, Y. & Jackson, K. (2014). Student satisfaction toward e-textbooks in higher education. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 5(3), 231-246.
- Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390-408.
- Ji, S. W., Michaels, S., & Waterman, D. (2014). Print vs. electronic readings in college courses: Cost-efficiency and perceived learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 17-24.
- Jung, S. M., & Lim, K. B. (2009). Leading future education: Development of digital textbooks in Korea. In: Paper presented at the proc. 12th UNESCO-APEID international conference quality innovations for teaching and learning.
- Kang, Y. Y., Wang, M. J., & Lin, R. (2009). Usability evaluation of e-books, Computers & Education, 30(1), 49-52.
- Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children's reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 1-19.
- Kim, M., Yoo, K.-H., Park, C., Yoo, J.-S., Byun, H., Cho, W., Ryu, J., et al. (2010). An XML-based digital textbook and its educational effectiveness. In T. Kim & H. Adeli (Eds.), Advances in computer science and information technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6059, 509-523.
- Kimball, R., Ives, G., & Jackson, K. (2010). Comparative usage of Science e-book and print collections at Texas A&M University Libraries. Collection Management, 35(1), 15-28.
- Kouis, D., & Konstantinou, N. (2014). Electronic textbooks advantages and challenges for the Hellenic higher education and publishing community. Library Review, 63(6/7), 531-543.
- Landoni, M., & Diaz, P. (2006). E-education: Design and evaluation for teaching and learning. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4).
- Landoy, A., Repanovici, A., & Gastinger, A. (2015, October). The more they tried it the less they liked it: Norwegian and Romanian student's response to electronic course material. In the European conference on information literacy, October, 455-463. Springer.
- Lau, K. H., Lam., T., Kam, B. H., NKjoma, M., Richardson, J., & Thomas, S. (2018). The role of textbook learning resources in e-learning: A taxonomic study. Computers & Education, 118, 10-24.
- Lim, E. L., & Hew, K. F. (2013). Students' perceptions of the usefulness of an E-book with annotative and sharing capabilities as a tool for learning: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-12.
- Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Bronnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68.
- McFall, R. L., Dershem, H. L., & Davis, D. (2006). Experiences using a collaborative electronic textbook: Bringing the guide on the side home with you. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 339-343.
- McGowan, M., Stephens, P., & West, C. (2009). Student perceptions of electronic textbooks. Issues in Information Systems, 10(2), 459-465.
- Muir, L. & Hawes, G. (2013). The case for e-book literacy: undergraduate students' experience with e-books for course work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39, 260-274.
- Murray, M. C., & Perez, J. (2011). E-Textbooks are coming: Are we ready. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8, 49-60.
- Nielsen, J. (2006). 'F-shaped pattern for reading web content'. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox. Source: NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ reading_pattern.html
- Novak, E., Daday, J., & McDaniel, K. (2018). Assessing intrinsic and extraneous cognitive complexity of e-textbook learning. Interaction with Computers, 30(2), 150-161.
- Pattuelli, M. C. & Rabina, D. (2010). Forms, effects, function: LIS students' attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings, 62(3), 228-244.
- Pollari-Malmi, K., Guerra, J., Brusilovsky, P., Malmi, L. & Sirkia, T. (2017). On the value of using an interactive electronic textbook in an introductory programming course Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research. ACM, s. 168-172.
- Reynolds, R. (2011). Trends influencing the growth of digital textbooks in US higher education. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27(2), 178-187.
- Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G. & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
- Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Courduff, J., Carter, K. and Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: a comparison study on the influence of university students' learning Computers & Education. 63, 259-266.
- Singer, L. M. & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education. 85, 155-172.
- Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 2-5.
- Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Wurtz, P., Schmid, L., & Bergamin, P. (2012). The effects of touch screen technology on the usability of e-reading devices. Journal of Usability Studies, 7(3), 94-104.
- Simon, E. J. (2001). Electronic textbooks: A pilot study of student e-reading habits. Future of Print Media Journal, Institute for Cyber-Information, Kent State University. Retrieved from http://www.ericjsimon.com/papers/papers/ebook.pdf
- Smith, M., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Building mobile learning capacity in higher education: E-books and iPads. In M. Specht, J. Multisilta & M. Sharples (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 298-301). Helsinki: CELSTEC & CICERO Learning.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Sung, J., Choi, H., & Ahn, H. (2009). Understanding distance students' use of educational media. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 15(1), 69-95.
- Terpend, R., Gattiker, T. F., & Lowe, S. E. (2014). Electronic textbooks: Antecedents of students' adoption and learning outcomes. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 12(2), 149-173.
- Van Horne, S., Russell, J.-E., & Schuh, K. L. (2016). The adoption of mark-up tools in an interactive e-textbook reader. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 407-433.
- Van Horne, S., Henze, M., Schuh, K.L., Colvin, C., & Russell, J. (2017). Facilitating adoption of an interactive e-textbook among university students in a large, introductory biology course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 477-495.
- Vassiliou, M., & Rowley, J. (2008). Progressing the definition of "e-book". Library Hi Tech, 26(3), 355-368.
- Walling, D. R. (2014). Designing learning for tablet classrooms: Innovations in instruction. Switzerland: Springer.
- Weisberg, M. (2011). Student attitudes and behaviors towards digital textbooks. Pub. Res. Quart., 27, 188-196.
- Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429-444.
- Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945-948.
- Yair, Y. Y. (2014). Print vs. digital books in distance education. ACM Inroads, 5(1), 28-29.