KDI Journal of Economic Policy

Korea Development Institute (한국개발연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessing Alternative Renewable Energy Policies in Korea's Electricity Market

  • Received : 2019.08.07
  • Published : 2019.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper, focusing on the renewable portfolio standard (RPS), evaluates alternative renewable energy policies. We propose a tractable equilibrium model which provides a structural representation of Korea's electricity market, including its energy settlement system and renewable energy certificate (REC) transactions. Arbitrage conditions are used to define the core value of REC prices to identify relevant competitive equilibrium conditions. The model considers R&D investments and learning effects that may affect the development of renewable energy technologies. The model is parameterized to represent the baseline scenario under the currently scheduled RPS reinforcement for a 20% share of renewable generation, and then simulated for alternative scenarios. The result shows that the reinforcement of the RPS leads to higher welfare compared to weakening it as well as repealing it, though there remains room to enhance welfare. It turns out that subsidies are welfare-inferior to the RPS due to financial burdens and that reducing nuclear power generation from the baseline yields lower welfare by worsening environmental externalities.

Keywords

References

  1. Biggar, Darryl R. and Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh. 2014. The Economics of Electricity Markets, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE press; New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Bhattacharya, Suparn, Konstantinos Giannakas, and Karina Schoengold. 2017. "Market and Welfare Effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards in United States Electricity Markets," Energy Economics 64: 384-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.011
  3. Borenstein, Severin and Stephen P. Holland. 2005. "On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets with Time-invariant Retail Prices," RAND Journal of Economics 36(3): 469-493.
  4. Chen, Xiaoguang, Haixiao Huang, Madhu Khanna, and Hayri Onal. 2014. "Alternative Transportation Fuel Standards: Welfare Effects and Climate Benefits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67(3): 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.09.006
  5. Electric Power Statistics Information System (EPSIS) (http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/epsisnew/selectEkmaSmpNsmGrid.do?menuId=050203, accessed Aug. 31, 2018).
  6. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2011. "The Electricity Market Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation," U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C., Technical Report.
  7. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2014. "The Electricity Market Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation 2014," U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C., Technical Report.
  8. Financial Reform Special Committee. 2018. "Recommendation for Fiscal Reform in the First Half." (in Korean)
  9. Fischer, Carolyn and Richard G. Newell. 2007. "Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation," RFF Discussion Paper 04-05 (Revised), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
  10. Fischer, Carolyn and Richard G. Newell. 2008. "Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55(2): 142-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001
  11. Fischer, Carolyn, Louis Preonas, and Richard G. Newell. 2017. "Environmental and Technology Policy Options in the Electricity Sector: Are We Deploying Too Many?" Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(4): 959-984. https://doi.org/10.1086/692507
  12. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2002. Renewable Energy Working Party 2002, Paris Cedex: France.
  13. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2018a. World Energy Balances 2018, Paris Cedex: France.
  14. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2018b. Energy Prices and Taxes, Vol. 2018, No. 3, Paris Cedex: France.
  15. International Energy Agency (IEA) and Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 2015. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: 2015 Edition, Paris Cedex: France; Issy-les-Moulineaux: France.
  16. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 2018. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017, Abu Dhabi: UAE.
  17. Jaffe, Adam B. 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits and Market Value," American Economic Review 76(5): 984-1001.
  18. Kim, Hyunjae and Gyeonglyeob Cho. 2010. "Economic Impacts of Renewable Portfolio Standard on Domestic Industry," Environmental and Resource Economics Review 19(4): 805-828. (in Korean)
  19. Kim, Hyunseok, 2018. "Welfare Impacts of the Renewable Portfolio Standard in Korea," Policy Study 2018-17, KDI. (in Korean)
  20. Kim, Suduk, and Choongeol Moon. 2005. "Economic Impacts of Introducing RPS," Environmental and Resource Economics Review 14(3): 729-751. (in Korean)
  21. Kim, Youngduk and Minsoo Park. 2013. "Changes in Elasticities of Demand for Oil Products and Electricity in Korea," Environmental and Resource Economics Review 22(2): 251-279. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15266/KEREA.2013.22.2.251
  22. Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO). 2017. No. 86 (2016) Korea Electricity Statistics. (in Korean)
  23. Korea Energy Agency, New and Renewable Energy Center, New and Renewable Energy Supply Statistics (https://www.knrec.or.kr/pds/st atistics.aspx, accessed Nov 19, 2018).
  24. Korea Power Exchange (KPX). 2014. "A Study on Improvement of Capacity Payment and Introduction of Capacity Market." (in Korean)
  25. Korea Power Exchange (KPX). 2017. 2016 Electricity Market Statistics. (in Korean)
  26. Korea Power Exchange (KPX). 2018. "A Study on the Levelized Cost of Energy by Generation Source." (in Korean)
  27. Kydes, Andy S. 2007. "Impacts of a Renewable Portfolio Generation Standard on US Energy Markets," Energy Policy 35(2): 809-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.002
  28. Lee, Chang-Hoon, Ji-Hae Jo, and Jung-Ho Yoon. 2014. "LCOE and Potentials of Renewable Energy in Korea," Climate and Environmental Policy Study 03, Korea Environmental Institute. (in Korean)
  29. Lim Seul-Ye, Kyoung-Min Lim, and Seung-Hoon Yoo. 2013. "Estimation of Residential Electricity Demand Function Using Cross-Section Data," Journal of Energy Engineering 22(1): 1-7. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2013.22.1.001
  30. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE). 2014. "2nd Basic Plan for Energy." (in Korean)
  31. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE). 2015. "7th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand." (in Korean)
  32. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE). 2017. "8th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand." (in Korean)
  33. Moschini, GianCarlo, Harvey Lapan, and Hyunseok Kim. 2017. "The Renewable Fuel Standard in Competitive Equilibrium: Market and Welfare Effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics 99(5): 1117-1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax041
  34. National Planning Advisory Committee. 2017. Five Year Plan for the Administration of the State. (in Korean)
  35. Newell, Richard G., Adam B. Jaffe, and Robert N. Stavins. 1999. "The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change," Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3): 941-975. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556188
  36. Nordhaus, William D. 2017. "Revisiting the Social Cost of Carbon," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 201609244.
  37. Parry, Ian W.H. and Kenneth A. Small. 2005. "Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax?" American Economic Review 95(4): 1276-1289. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825510
  38. Qiu, Yueming and Laura D. Anadon. 2012. "The Price of Wind Power in China during its Expansion: Technology Adoption, Learning-by-Doing, Economies of Scale, and Manufacturing Localization," Energy Economics 34(3): 772-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.008
  39. Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Stoft, Steven. 2002. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press; New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  41. U.S. Government. 2016. "Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866," Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases.
  42. Yi, Donggyu. 2018. "A Study on the Rational Adjustment of Energy Tax System for Power Generation," Korea Institute of Public Finance. (in Korean)