DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detergency improvement of hydrophilic soils in dry cleaning process

드라이클리닝 시 친수성 오구의 세탁성 향상을 위한 연구

  • Received : 2019.11.30
  • Accepted : 2019.12.17
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The dry cleaning effect related to the type of soil and fiber was analyzed using silicone and alcohol-based solvents(ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, acetone) that are relatively safe for the human body and environment to improve the detergency of hydrophilic soils in dry cleaning system. Based on this analysis, an effective dry cleaning method to be carried out for improving the detergency according to the type of hydrophilic soils. After dry cleaning was performed using 20 types of artificial soiled fabrics consisting of 7 types of fibers and 4 types of hydrophilic soils, the detergency was measured and the results were compared and analyzed by solvents and fiber types. The results are presented as follows; first, the detergency of hydrophilic soils using silicone solvents showed a low rate of detergency. In particular, the tannin soil showed a lower level of detergency compared to the protein soil. Second, the detergency of hydrophilic soils using silicon solvents with dry soap differed in some detergency according to the soil and fiber types. Especially, the detergency of curry soil on cotton fabric showed significant improvement. Third, the protein soil was not removed from dry cleaning using alcohol-based solvents, but the effect of dry cleaning of curry soil on both cotton and polyester fabric was substantially improved. As a result, the elimination of blood soil is more effective in silicon solvents than in alcohol-based solvents. The removal of tannin soils may improve detergency by adding dry soap to silicon solvents or by using alcohol-based solvents as alternative solvents. The use of alternative solvents such as silicon and alcohol solvents can contribute to the environmental improvement of the dry cleaning industry, which uses petroleum-based solvents. It is also expected to provide consumers with the opportunity to choose eco-friendly and efficient dry cleaning methods.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽수경, 김아리, 오화원, 박명자. (2018). 물세탁과 드라이클리닝의 세탁성능과 형태안정성 비교. 한국의상디자인학회지, 21(1), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.30751/kfcda.2019.21.1.181
  2. 김성련. (2002). 세제와 세탁의 과학. 파주: 교문사.
  3. 김재혁, 유경선. (2017). 세탁소 VOCs 관리현황 고찰 및 정책제언. 환경정책, 25(3), 139-171.
  4. 김주연, 박정희. (1999). 드라이클리닝 시스템에서의 세탁성과 재오염성-계면활성제의 종류와 혼합이 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 23(7), 1030-1039.
  5. 김천희. (2012). 친환경 실리콘계 드라이클리닝용제 (Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane) 에서 모직물의 세탁성과 재오염성. 한국염색가공학회지, 24(2), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.5764/TCF.2012.24.2.138
  6. 김천희. (2017). 실리콘계 용제(Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, D5) 와 실리콘계 계면활성제에 의한 면직물과 Polyester/Cotton (65/35) 직물의 친환경 드라이클리닝 효과 향상. 한국생활과학회지, 26(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.2.121
  7. 김천희. (2014). 친환경 실리콘계 드라이클리닝 용제 (Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, D5) 의 모직물 세탁성 향상을 위한 드라이클리닝세제용 계면활성제 연구. 한국염색가공학회지, 26(3), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.5764/TCF.2014.26.3.209
  8. 신정숙. (1992). 드라이클리닝 용제의 안전성에 관한 고찰. Family and Environment Research, 30(2), 35-43.
  9. 신정숙, 차옥선. (1997). 상용 드라이클리닝에 의한 섬유제품의 미생물 제거효과. 한국생활환경학회지, 4(2), 37-43.
  10. 신진호, 권승미, 김현수, 노방식, 김광래, 어수미, 이영규. (2017). 소형챔버를 이용한 드라이클리닝 모직물 목도리의 휘발성유기화합물 방출 특성. 한국환경보건학회지, 43(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2017.43.2.95
  11. 최정민, 이두형, 김동석, 곽지현, 노호성. (2012). 세탁소 드라이클리닝용 석유계용제의 화재위험성 실험적 연구. 한국화재소방학회 학술대회 논문집, 한국, 585-588.
  12. 2009-2013년 세탁업체 수. (2016, 6. 20). 국가통계포털. 자료검색일 2018, 12, 10, 자료출처 http://www.kosis.kr
  13. Jo, W. K., & Kim, S. H. (2001). Worker exposure to aromatic volatile organic compounds in dry cleaning stores. AIHAJ-American Industrial Hygiene Association, 62(4), 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984648
  14. O'Lenick, A. J. (2000). Silicone emulsions and surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 3(3), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-000-0143-y
  15. Troynikov, O., Watson, C., Jadhav, A., Nawaz, N., & Kettlewell, R. (2016). Towards sustainable and safe apparel cleaning methods: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.078