DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The role of visual and verbal information on the functionality of shapewear in female consumers' online purchase decisions

  • Shin, Eonyou (Dept. of Apparel, Housing, and Resource Management, Virginia Tech) ;
  • Zhang, Ling (Dept. of Apparel, Events, and Hospitality Management, Iowa State University) ;
  • Hwang, Chanmi (Dept. of Apparel, Merchandising, Design, and Textile, Washington State University) ;
  • Baytar, Fatma (Dept. of Fiber Science & Apparel Design, Cornell University)
  • Received : 2019.10.16
  • Accepted : 2019.12.03
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the role of information on shapewear's functionality in consumers' purchase decisions in an online shopping context. Through two steps of stimulus development process, four mock websites were developed to conduct a main study. In the main study, a 2 (visual information: absent vs. present images of the shapewear's functionality) x 2 (verbal information: absent vs. present descriptions of the shapewear's functionality) between-subject factorial design was employed to examine the impact of visual and verbal information regarding the functionality of shapewear on the consumer decision-making process (i.e., attitudes and purchase intentions). The results showed that verbal information about how shapewear reduces the size of specific body parts (i.e., waist, abdomen, hips, and thighs) were effective in increasing perceived attractiveness in an online context, which increased attitudes and purchase intentions. In addition, attitudes toward the shapewear mediated the effects of expected physical attractiveness on purchase intentions. The results of this study provided empirical support for the importance of expected physical attractiveness in consumers' online purchase decision on shapewear and useful managerial implications for enhancing the effectiveness of online shapewear presentations by including descriptions of the functionality of shapewear in decreasing the size of body parts.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Perso nality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607-627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86(5), 452-464. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.452
  3. Burns-Ardolino, W. (2007). Jiggle: (Re) shaping American women. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  4. Cohn, L. D., & Adler, N. E. (1992). Female and male perceptions of ideal body shapes: Distorted views among Caucasian college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 69-79. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00240.x
  5. Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
  6. Cunningham, M. R., Druen, P. B., & Barbee, A. P. (1997). Angels, mentors, and friends: Trade-offs among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 109-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation (Vol. 24). London, United Kingdom: Sage.
  8. Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. (2011). Women's meta-perceptions of attractiveness and their relations to body image. Body Image, 8(1), 74-77. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.09.007
  9. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. doi:10.2307/3172866
  10. Fan, J., Liu, F., Wu, J., & Dai, W. (2004). Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proceeding of Biological Sciences, 271(1537), 347-352. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2613
  11. Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 39, 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018810723493
  12. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
  13. Grand View Research. (2019, July). Shapewear market size, share & trends analysis report by end user (male, female), by distribution channel (hypermarket & supermarket, specialty store, online), by region, and segment forecasts, 2019-2025. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/shapewear-market
  14. Grogan, S. (2016). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women and children. London: Routledge.
  15. Indiaretailing Bureau. (2014, May 17). Shapewear: The new way to look to slim & sexy. Business of Fashion. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.indiaretailing.com/2014/05/01/fashion/shapewear-the-new-way-to-look-slim-sexy/
  16. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers' product understanding. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 475-500. doi:10.2307/25148804
  17. Kempf, D. S., & Smith, R. E. (1998). Consumer processing of product trial and the influence of prior advertising: A structural modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(3), 325-338. doi:10.1177/002224379803500304
  18. Kim, K., & Lennon, S. (2010). Information available on a website: Effects on consumers' shopping outcomes. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 14(2), 247-262. doi:10.1108/13612021011046093
  19. Kim, M. (2019). Digital product presentation, information processing, need for cognition and behavioral intent in digital commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 362-370. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.011
  20. Kim, M., & Lennon, S. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178. doi:10.1002/mar.20204
  21. Kizilcec, R. F., Papadopoulos, K., & Sritanyaratana, L. (2014). Showing face in video instruction: Effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2095-2102). ACM. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557207
  22. Korgaonkar, P. K., Lund, D., & Price, B. (1985). A structural equations approach toward examination of store attitude and store patronage behavior. Journal of Retailing, 61(2), 39-60.
  23. Lim, H. S., & Chun, J. (2015). Analysis of cross sections and silhouette in body shape according to girdle worn using 3D body scanner. The Research Journal of Costume Culture, 23(2), 242-253. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.2.242
  24. Loken, B., & Peck, J. (2005). The effects of instructional frame on female adolescents' evaluations of larger sized female models in print advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(4), 850-868. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02149.x
  25. Lutz, K. A., & Lutz, R. J. (1978). Imagery-eliciting strategies: Review and implications of research. Advances in Consumer Research, 5(1), 611-620.
  26. Maclnnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. The Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 1-23. doi:10.1177/002224298905300401
  27. Malthouse, E., & Shankar, V. (2009). Measuring and managing interactive environments. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(3), 207-208. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.001
  28. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Statistical analysis with latent variables using Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
  29. Orbis Research. (2019, July 5). Global online lingerie market 2019: Application, industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends, demands, opportunity and forecast 2024. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.reuters.com/brandfeatures/venture-capital/article?id=128595
  30. Pan, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Determinants of retail patronage: A meta-analytical perspective. Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 229-243. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.008
  31. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  32. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, D., Rowland, S., Yoshikawa, D. M., Burt, S. P., . . . & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884-887. doi:10.1038/29772
  33. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  34. Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77-91. doi:10.1080/00913367.1994.10673443
  35. Schmalt, H. D. (2006). Waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness: The moderating role of power motivation and the mating context. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 455-465. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.008
  36. Sharps, M. J., & Price, J. L. (1992). Auditory imagery and free recall. The Journal of General Psychology, 119(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1992.9921160
  37. Singh, D. (1993). Body shape and women's attractiveness: The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human Nature, 4(3), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692203
  38. Singh, D. (1994). Waist-to-hip ratio and judgment of attractiveness and healthiness of female figures by male and female physicians. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 18(11), 731-737.
  39. Sorokowski, P., Szmajke, A., Sorokowska, A., Borg Cunen, M., Fabrykant, M., Zarafshani, K., . . . & Fang, T. (2011). Attractiveness of leg length: Report from 27 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(1), 131-139. doi:10.1177/0022022110392229
  40. Swami, V., Caprario, C., Tovee, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2006). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 20(1), 69-81. doi:10.1002/per.568
  41. Tassinary, L. G., & Hansen, K. A. (1998). A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science, 9(2), 150-155. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00029
  42. Terry, R. B., Page, W. F., & Haskell, W. L. (1992). Waist/hip ratio, body mass index and premature cardiovascular disease mortality in US Army vete rans during a twenty-three year follow-up study. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 16(6), 417-423.
  43. Tiggmann, M. (1992). Body-size dissatisfaction: Individual differences in age and gender, and relationship with self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(1), 39-43. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90215-B
  44. Tovee, M. J., Edmonds, L., & Vuong, Q. C. (2012). Categorical perception of human female physical attractiveness and health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(2), 85-93. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.008
  45. Tovee, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266(1415), 211-218. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0624
  46. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hu man Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.830
  47. Usigan, Y. (2018). The science of shapewear. Shape. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.shape.com/lifestyle/beauty-style/science-shapewear
  48. Wang, G., Djafarian, K., Egedigwe, C. A., Hamdouchi, A. E., Ojiambo, R., Ramuth, H., . . . & Speakman, J. R. (2015). The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness. PeerJ, 3, e1115. doi:10.7717/peerj.1155
  49. Yoo, J., & Kim, M. (2014). The effect of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 12464-2472. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.006
  50. Zhang, L., Shin, E., Hwang, C., & Baytar, F. (2017). The use of 3D body scanning technology to assess the effectiveness of shapewear: Changes in body shape and attractiveness. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology, and Education, 10(2), 190-199. doi:10.1080/17543266.2016.1225824