DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Relationship and Validity of the Management Evaluation Factors in Public Firms With a Focus on the Port Authorities

  • Lee, Sung-Yhun (School of Port and Logistics, Kaya University) ;
  • Ahn, Ki-Myung (Division of Shipping Management, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • Received : 2019.10.07
  • Accepted : 2019.11.14
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

According to the results of the management evaluation of the nation's public firms over the past seven years, the rating of the port corporation is generally insufficient. According to the results of the seven-year study 2011-2017, the average debt ratio of the port corporation was 34.5%, two to three times lower than that of the general public company, the operating profit ratio of sales was three times higher, and the value added per person was 1.6-1.9 times better. However, the aggregate score and grade were generally low, with 4.1% of the total number of employees of the general public corporation, 10% of the average total assets, and 1% of the average sales volume. The distributed analysis results and panel return analysis results show that the size significantly impacts the overall score and grade. Additionally, major business standards such as port volume, not controlled by the port corporation, appear to have a decisive influence on the low grade of the port corporation. Thus, it appears that improvement and supplementation of key business indicators of port construction are urgently needed in the management evaluation system, which can be properly controlled.

Keywords

References

  1. An S. C.(2014),"The Performance of Public Institutions and Firm Characteristics", Journal of the Korea Business Association, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 835-859.
  2. Choi, S. R. and Park, M. J.(2009), "Performance Analysis of the Public Enterprise Evaluation System ", Journal of Administration, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 183-208.
  3. Kang, Y. H.(2009), "The Governance and Agent Problems of Public Agency: Focused on the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 743-756. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2009.33.10.743
  4. Kim, J. K.(2001),"Performance of Public Enterprise Management Evaluation System and Future Tasks", Korean Administration Research, Vol. 10, No. 14.
  5. Kwak, C. K.(2003), "The Role and Performance of Management Evaluation System for the Control of Inefficiency of Government-invested Institutions," Journal of public enterprises.
  6. Kwak, C. K.(1995), "Proposals Problems and Management Innovation of Public Enterprises, "Journal of public enterprises.
  7. Kwon, S. M., Pak, J. Y., Jung, H. J., Wang, Y. and Yeo, G. T.(2011), "A Study on the role of port operation organizations for the development of a region port", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 439-444. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2011.35.5.439
  8. Lee, E. S. and Ahn, K. M.(2013), "A Study on the Validity & Reform Measure of Public Enterprise's Management Performance Evaluation", Korean Journal of Logistics, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 51-65. https://doi.org/10.15735/kls.2013.21.4.004
  9. Lee, H. Y.(2013), Research methodology, Cheongram, pp. 303-437.
  10. Oh, Y. C. and Jang, J. J.(2003),"A Study on the Development of the Management Evaluation System of Government-invested Institutions", Journal of public enterprises.
  11. Park, H. C., Lee, S. Y. and Ahn, K. M.(2018), "A Study on the Reconfiguration effect of Busan Port Operator in logistics environment", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 507-517.
  12. Park, S. H.(2006), "Performance Management and Organizational Producitivity in the public Enterprises", Journal of Korea Administrative Studies, Vol. 40, No 4, pp. 511-530.
  13. Shin, H. M.(2011), An Analysis of the Influence of the Management Evaluation on the Performance of Public Enterprises: Focused on the Evaluation of the Head of the Agency, master's thesis, Seoul National University.
  14. Song, D. H., Lee, J. G., Kim, S. K. and Ryu, H. J.(1987), Theoretical Background and Techniques of Management Evaluation of Public Enterprises, Focus on the Management Evaluation of Governmentinvested Institutions, Korea Development Institute, pp. 19-28.