Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Criteria for Collision Avoidance of Naval Ships for Obstacles in Constant Bearing, Decreasing Range (CBDR)

방위끌림이 없는 장애물에 대한 함정의 충돌회피 기준에 관한 연구

  • 하정수 (해군사관학교 조선공학과) ;
  • 정연환 (해군사관학교 조선공학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.31
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Naval ships that are navigating always have the possibility of colliding, but there is no clear maneuvering procedure for collision avoidance, and there is a tendency to depend entirely on the intuitive judgment of the Officer Of Watch (OOW). In this study, we conducted a questionnaire survey when and how to avoid collision for the OOW in a Constant Bearing, Decreasing Range (CBDR) situation wherein the naval ships encountered obstacles. Using the results of the questionnaire survey, we analyzed the CBDR situation of encountering obstacles, and how to avoid collision in day/night. The most difficult to maneuver areas were Pyeongtaek, Mokpo, and occurred mainly in narrow channels. The frequency appeared on average about once every four hours, and there were more of a large number of ships encountering situations than the 1:1 situation. The method of check of collision course confirmation was more reliable with the eye confirmation results, and priority was given to distance at closest point of approach (DCPA) and time at closest point of approach (TCPA). There was not a difference in DCPA between the give-way ship and stand-on ship, but a difference between day and night. Also, most navigators prefer to use maneuvering & shifting when avoiding collisions, and steering is 10-15°, shifting ±5knots, and the drift course was direction added stern of the obstacles to the direction of it. These results will facilitate in providing officers with standards for collision avoidance, and also apply to the development of AI and big data based unmanned ship collision avoidance algorithms.

항해 중인 함정은 늘 충돌 가능성이 존재하지만 충돌회피를 위한 명확한 기동지침은 없고 함교 당직사관의 직관적 판단에 의존하는 경향이 있다. 본 연구에서는 항해 중인 함정이 방위끌림이 없는 장애물을 조우하는 상황에서 함교 당직사관을 대상으로 언제 어떻게 충돌을 회피하는지 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문 결과를 활용하여 방위끌림이 없는 장애물 조우 상황, 주·야간 충돌 회피 방법을 분석하였다. 조함이 까다로운 지역은 평택, 목포 순이었고, 주로 협수로 내에서 발생하였다. 빈도는 4시간 항해 시 평균 1회 정도로 나타났으며, 1:1 조우 상황보다 다수 선박 조우가 많았다. 충돌침로 확인 시 전자해도보다 육안 확인 결과를 더 신뢰하였고, 충돌회피 고려 요소로 최단 접근거리, 최단 접근시간을 우선시하였다. 피항의무선과 침로유지선의 충돌회피 기동상 특별한 차이는 없었지만 주·야간 시 최단 접근거리의 차이는 존재했다. 충돌회피 시 대부분의 항해사들은 변침·변속을 함께 사용하는 것을 선호하며 타각 10~15°, 변속 ±5knots, 변침침로는 타함 함미 정방향에서 함미 가중치를 두었다. 이러한 결과들은 승조원들에게 부임 함정의 충돌 회피 기준을 제공하는데 도움이 될 것이며 나아가 AI, 빅데이터 기반의 무인함정 충돌회피 알고리즘 개발에도 적용될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J. and Langard, B.(2013), "Human and Organisational Factors in Maritime Accidents", Analysis of Collisions at Sea Using the HFACS, Accidents Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 59, pp. 26-37.
  2. EMSA.(2017), "Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents", European Maritime Safety Agency.
  3. Hasegawa, K., Kouzuki, A., Muramatsu, T., Komine, H. and Watabe, Y.(1989), "Ship Auto-navigation Fuzzy Expert System(SAFES)", Journal of the Society of Naval Architectures of Japan, Vol. 166.
  4. Heo, T., Park, Y. and Kim, J.(2012), "A Study on the Development of Marine Traffic Risk Model for Mariners", Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 91-100. https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2012.30.5.091
  5. IEEE.(2017), "New and Events", Transactions on Maritime Science, pp. 76-78. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v07.n01.008
  6. Itoh, H., Mitomo, N., Matsuoka, T. and Murohara, Y.(2004), "Extension of the m-SHEL Model for Analysis of Human Factors at Ship Operation", the Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation, Vol. 110, pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.9749/jin.110.83
  7. Kim, I.(2018), Korean Maritime Traffic Law, Samwoosa.
  8. Lee, J., Jung, M. and Song, C.(2015), "A Study on the Degree of Collision Risk with Relative Bearing at CPA", Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 493-498. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.6.493
  9. Lee, Y., Park, J. and Lee, Y.(2014), "A Study on the Initial Action of Navigators to Avoid Ri나 of Collision at Sea", Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 327-333. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2014.38.4.327
  10. Ozkan, U., Umut, Y. and Ersan, B.(2015), "Analysis of Grounding Accidents Caused by Human Error", Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 748-760.
  11. Park, M, Jeon, Y. and Lee, Y.(2013), "A Study on the Collision between Fishing Vessel and Non Fishing Vessel Using Questionnaire Analysis", The Korea Society for Fishries and Marine Science Education, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 716-623.
  12. Park, Y., Park, S. and Cho, I.(2015), "A Basic Study on Prediction Module Development of Collision Risk Based on Ship's Operator's Consciousness", Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 199-208. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.3.199
  13. Pennie, D., Brook-Carter, N. and Gibson, W.(2007), "Human Factors Guidance for Maintenance", In : Human Factors in Ship Design Safety and Operation Conference, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, UK.
  14. Rudan, I., Komadina, P. and Ivce, R.(2012), "Officer's Subjective Near Miss Notion in Situations of Collision Avoidance at Sea", Promet-Traffice & Trasportation, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 317-322. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v24i4.441