Advances in concrete construction

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of one way reinforced concrete slab characteristics on structural response under blast loading

  • Kee, Jung Hun (Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Jong Yil (Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seong, Joo Hyun (Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Corporation)
  • Received : 2019.06.04
  • Accepted : 2019.08.21
  • Published : 2019.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In evaluating explosion-protection capacity, safety distance is broadly accepted as the distance at which detonation of a given explosive causes acceptable structural damage. Safety distance can be calculated based on structural response under blast loading and damage criteria. For the applicability of the safety distance, the minimum required stand-off distance should be given when the explosive size is assumed. However, because of the nature of structures, structural details and material characteristics differ, which requires sensitivity analysis of the safety distance. This study examines the safety-distance sensitivity from structural and material property variations. For the safety-distance calculation, a blast analysis module based on the Kingery and Bulmash formula, a structural response module based on a Single Degree of Freedom model, and damage criteria based on a support rotation angle were prepared. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for the Reinforced Concrete one-way slab with different thicknesses, reinforcement ratios, reinforcement yield strengths, and concrete compressive strengths. It was shown that slab thickness has the most significant influence on both inertial force and flexure resistance, but the compressive strength of the concrete is not relevant.

Keywords

References

  1. Badshah, E., Naseer, A., Ashraf, M., Shah, F. and Akhtar, K. (2017), "Review of Blast Loading Models, Masonry Response, and Mitigation", Shock Vib., 2017, Article ID 6708341, 15.
  2. Biggs, J.M. and Biggs, J.M. (1964), Introduction to Structural Dynamics, McGraw-Hill College.
  3. Chipley, M. (2003), Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings: Providing Protection to People and Building, FEMA.
  4. El-Dakhakhni, W.W., Mekky, W.F. and Rezaei, S.C. (2009), "Validity of SDOF models for analyzing two-way reinforced concrete panels under blast loading", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 24(4), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000009
  5. Ellefsen, R. and Fordyce, D. (2012), "Urban terrain building types: Public releasable version", No. ARL-TR-4395A, Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Survivability-Lethality Analysis Directorate.
  6. Feldgun, V.R., Yankelevsky, D.Z. and Karinski, Y.S. (2016), "A nonlinear SDOF model for blast response simulation of elastic thin rectangular plates", Int. J. Impact Eng., 88, 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.09.001
  7. Filler, W.S. (1976), "The influence of inert cases on air blast: An experimental study", Proceedings of the 6th Detonation Symposium, Coronado, California, USA.
  8. Fischer, K. and Haring, I. (2009), "SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments", Eng. Struct., 31(8), 1677-1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.040
  9. Fisher, E.M. (1953), "The effect of the steel case on the air blast from high explosives", Naval Ordnance Lab White Oak Md.
  10. Hou, X., Cao, S., Rong, Q. and Zheng, W. (2018), "A PI diagram approach for predicting failure modes of RPC one-way slabs subjected to blast loading", Int. J. Impact Eng., 120, 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.006
  11. Hyde, D.W. (1991), CONWEP: Conventional Weapons Effects Program, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. USA.
  12. Kingery, C.N. and Bulmash, G. (1984), "Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst", US Army Armament and Development Center, Ballistic Research Laboratory.
  13. Lee, S.J., Park, J.Y., Lee, Y.H. and Kim, H.S. (2017), "Experimental analysis on the criteria of the explosion damage for one-way RC slabs", J. Korea. Soc. Saf., 32(6), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2017.32.6.68
  14. Li, J., Wu, C., Hao, H., Su, Y. and Li, Z.X. (2017), "A study of concrete slabs with steel wire mesh reinforcement under close-in explosive loads", Int. J. Impact Eng., 110, 242-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.016
  15. Li, Q.M. and Meng, H. (2002), "Pressure-impulse diagram for blast loads based on dimensional analysis and single-degree-of-freedom model", J. Eng. Mech., 128(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:1(87)
  16. Madias, J., Wright, M., Behr, G. and Valladares, V. (2017), "Analysis of international standards on concrete reinforcing steel bar", AISTech 2017 Proceedings.
  17. McDonald, B., Bornstein, H., Langdon, G.S., Curry, R., Daliri, A. and Orifici, A.C. (2018), "Experimental response of high strength steels to localised blast loading", Int. J. Impact Eng., 115, 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.01.012
  18. Mohammed, T.A. and Parvin, A. (2013), "Evaluating damage scale model of concrete materials using test data", Adv. Concrete Constr., 1(4), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc2013.1.4.289
  19. Netherton, M.D. and Stewart, M.G. (2009), "The effects of explosive blast load variability on safety hazard and damage risks for monolithic window glazing", Int. J. Impact Eng., 36(12), 1346-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.009
  20. PDC-TR-06-08 (2008), Single Degree of Freedom Structural Response Limits for Antiterrorism Design, US Army Corps of Engineers, USA.
  21. PDCTR-06 (2008), Methodology Manual for the Single-degree-of freedom Blast Effects Design Spreadsheets (SBEDS), 1.1-10.4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USA.
  22. Rigby, S.E., Tyas, A. and Bennett, T. (2012), "Single-degree-of-freedom response of finite targets subjected to blast loading-the influence of clearing", Eng. Struct., 45, 396-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.034
  23. Russo, P. and Parisi, F. (2016), "Risk-targeted safety distance of reinforced concrete buildings from natural-gas transmission pipelines", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 148, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.11.016
  24. Shentsov, V., Kim, W., Makarov, D. and Molkov, V. (2016), "Numerical simulations of experimental fireball and blast wave from a high-pressure tank rupture in a fire", Proc. of the Eighth International Seminar on Fire & Explosion Hazards (ISFEH8), Hefei, China.
  25. Shin, J. and Lee, K. (2018), "Blast performance evaluation of structural components under very near explosion", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 22(2), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1889-7
  26. Toy, A.T. and Sevim, B. (2017), "Numerically and empirically determination of blasting response of a RC retaining wall under TNT explosive", Adv. Concrete Constr., 5(5), 493-512. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2017.5.5.493
  27. UFC 3-340-02 (2008), Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, US DoD, Washington, DC, USA.
  28. Wu, Z., Zhang, P., Fan, L. and Liu, Q. (2019), "Debris characteristics and scattering pattern analysis of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to internal blast loads-a numerical study", Int. J. Impact Eng., 131,1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.04.024
  29. Yuan, S., Hao, H., Zong, Z. and Li, J. (2017), "A study of RC bridge columns under contact explosion", Int. J. Impact Eng., 109, 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.07.017

Cited by

  1. Simple P-I diagram for structural components based on support rotation angle criteria vol.10, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.10.6.509