DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Considerations for Seismic Design of Low-Rise Residential Bearing Wall Buildings with Pilotis

필로티형 저층 내력벽주택의 내진설계 고려사항

  • 이승제 (단국대학교 건축공학과 대학원) ;
  • 엄태성 (단국대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.19
  • Accepted : 2018.11.28
  • Published : 2019.01.01

Abstract

In this study, the results of an analytical investigation on the seismic behavior of two residential 4-story bearing wall buildings with pilotis, each of which has symmetric or unsymmetric wall arrangement at their piloti level, are presented. The dynamic characteristics and lateral resistance of the piloti buildings were investigated through linear elastic and nonlinear static analyses. According to the results, the analytical natural period of vibration of the piloti buildings were significantly shorter than the fundamental period calculated in accordance with KBC 2016. In the initial elastic behavior, the walls resisting in-plane shear contributed to the lateral stiffness and strength, while the contribution of columns resisting flexural moments in double curvature was limited. However, after the shear cracking and yielding of the walls occurred, the columns significantly contributed to the residual strength and ductility. Based on those investigations, design recommendations of low-rise bearing wall buildings with piloti configuration are given.

Keywords

References

  1. Oh SH. Pohang Earthquake Damage Report and Policy Proposal (Presentation Material). Seminar on Earthquake Damage of Building Structures in Korea and Japan : Report on 2017 Pohang Earthquake. Architectural Institute of Korea. c2017 Dec.
  2. Park HG, Kim DK, Kim SJ, Kim CG, Kim TW, Eom TS, Oh SH, Lee KS, Choi KK, Kim YH, Cho BS, Yang SH, Kwak DS Kim HK, Lee YI. Research on Earthquake Damage Prevention of Building Structures with Pilotis, Architectural Institute of Korea. c2018 Apr.
  3. Kim TW, Chu YR, Kim SR, Bhandari D. Seismic Behavior of Domestic Piloti-Type Buildings Damaged by 2017 Pohang Earthquake. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2018 Apr;22(3):161-168. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2018.22.3.161
  4. Eom TS, Lee SJ, Park HG. Investigation of Structural Damage Investigation of Bearing Wall Buildings with Piloti Configuration by 2017 Pohang Earthquake. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2019 January;23(1):1-9.
  5. Architectural Institute of Korea, Korean Building Code - Structural (KBC 2016). Architectural Institute of Korea. c2016.
  6. Kim DH, Kim TW, Chu YR. Collapse Probability of a Low-Rise Piloti-Type Building Considering Domestic Seismic Hazard. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2016 Dec;20(7):485-494. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2016.20.7.485
  7. Yoo CH, Kim TW, Chu YR. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Small-Size Piloti-Type Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2016 Jul;20(4):191-199. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2016.20.4.191
  8. Ko DW, Lee HS. Nonlinear Time History Analysis of Piloti-Type High-Rise RC Buildings. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2009 Feb;13(1):35-43. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2009.13.1.035
  9. Ko DW, Lee HS. Correlation of Experimental and Analytical Inelastic Responses of 1:12 Scale Irregular High-Rise RC Buildings. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2007 Apr;11(2):95-104. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2007.11.2.095
  10. Lee HS, Lee JJ, Jung DW. Analytical Simulation of the Seismic Response of a High-Rise RC Building Model. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2008 Oct;12(5):1-10. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2008.12.5.001
  11. MIDAS Information Technology. Analysis manuel of MIDAS-GEN. c2005.
  12. Korean Infrastructure Safety Corporation, Seismic Performance Evaluation Manuel of Existing Buildings. c2011.
  13. Computer and Structures Inc. Perform-3D: Nonlinear Aanlysis and Performance Assesment for 3D Structures - User Guide Ver. 5. Berkeley. CA. c2011.
  14. Collins MP, Mitchell D. Shear and Torsion Design of Prestressed and Non-Prestressed Concrete Beams. PCI. 1980 Sep;25(5):32-100. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09011980.32.100
  15. Bentz EC, Vecchio FJ, Collins MP. Simplified Modified Compression Field Theory for Calculating Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Elements. ACI Structural Journal. 2006 Jul;103(4):614-624.
  16. Esfandiari A. Shear Strength of Structural Concrete Members Using a Uniform Shear Element Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia. c2009.
  17. Eom TS, Nam HS. Load Contour Method for Biaxial Design of Reinforced Concrete L-Shaped Structural Walls. Engineering Structures. 2017;146:148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.049
  18. Nam HS, Eom TS. Biaxial Interaction and Load Contour Method for Reinforced Concrete C- and H-Shaped Structural Walls. Journal of the Korean Concrete Institute. 2017;29(2):189-200. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2017.29.2.189
  19. Applied Technology Council. Seismic Analysis and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, CA.
  20. Applied Technology Council, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. FEMA-440, Federal Emergecy Management Agency. USA. c2005.