DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi-objective optimization of stormwater pipe networks and on-line stormwater treatment devices in an ultra-urban setting

  • Kim, Jin Hwi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Dong Hoon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul) ;
  • Kang, Joo-Hyon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul)
  • Received : 2018.05.14
  • Accepted : 2018.08.31
  • Published : 2019.01.25

Abstract

In a highly urbanized area, land availability is limited for the installation of space consuming stormwater systems for best management practices (BMPs), leading to the consideration of underground stormwater treatment devices connected to the stormwater pipe system. The configuration of a stormwater pipe network determines the hydrological and pollutant transport characteristics of the stormwater discharged through the pipe network, and thus should be an important design consideration for effective management of stormwater quantity and quality. This article presents a multi-objective optimization approach for designing a stormwater pipe network with on-line stormwater treatment devices to achieve an optimal trade-off between the total installation cost and the annual removal efficiency of total suspended solids (TSS). The Non-dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was adapted to solve the multi-objective optimization problem. The study site used to demonstrate the developed approach was a commercial area that has an existing pipe network with eight outfalls into an adjacent stream in Yongin City, South Korea. The stormwater management model (SWMM) was calibrated based on the data obtained from a subcatchment within the study area and was further used to simulate the flow rates and TSS discharge rates through a given pipe network for the entire study area. In the simulation, an underground stormwater treatment device was assumed to be installed at each outfall and sized proportional to the average flow rate at the outfall. The total installation cost for the pipes and underground devices was estimated based on empirical formulas using the flow rates and TSS discharge rates simulated by the SWMM. In the demonstration example, the installation cost could be reduced by up to 9% while the annual TSS removal efficiency could be increased by 4% compared to the original pipe network configuration. The annual TSS removal efficiency was relatively insensitive to the total installation cost in the Pareto-optimal solutions of the pipe network design. The results suggested that the installation cost of the pipes and stormwater treatment devices can be substantially reduced without significantly compromising the pollutant removal efficiency when the pipe network is optimally designed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea

References

  1. Afshar, M.H., Afshar, A., Marino, M.A. and Darbandi, A.A.S. (2006), "Hydrograph-based storm sewer design optimization by genetic algorithm", Can. J. Civil Eng., 33(3), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-121
  2. Barco, J., Wong, K.M. and Stenstrom, M.K. (2008), "Automatic calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment", J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(4), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(466)
  3. Box, M.J. (1965), "A new method of constrained optimization and a comparison with other methods", Comput. J., 8(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/8.1.42
  4. Deb, K., Pratap, A. and Agarwal, S. (2002), "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182-197 https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  5. Eckart, K., McPhee, Z. and Bolisetti, T. (2018), "Multiobjective optimization of low impact development stormwater controls", J. Hydrolog., 562, 564-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.068
  6. Elliott, A.H. and Trowsdale, S.A. (2007), "A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage", Environ. Modell. Softw., 22(3), 394-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005
  7. FHWA (2000), "Stormwater best management practices in an ultra-urban setting: Selection and monitoring", Office of Natural Environment, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
  8. Haque, M.I. (1996), "Optimal frame design with discrete members using the complex method", Comput. Struct., 59(5), 847-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00301-0
  9. Hatt, B.E., Fletcher, T.D., Walsh, C.J. and Taylor, S.L. (2004), "The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams", Environ. Manag., 34(1), 112-124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0221-8
  10. Heaney, J.P., Sample, D., Wright, L. and Fan, C. (2002), "Costs of urban stormwater control", EPA-600/R-02/021; National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
  11. Hossain, L., Imteaz, M., Trinidad, S.G. and Shanableh, A. (2010), "Development of a catchment water quality model for continuous simulations of pollutants build-up and wash-off", J. Environ. Ecolog. Eng., 4(1), 11-18.
  12. Huber, W.C. and Dickinson, R.E. (1992), "Storm water management model, version 4.0: User's manual", EPA/600/3-88/001a; Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Athens, Georgia, U.S.A.
  13. Ishibuchi, H., Sakane, Y., Tsukamoto, N. and Nojima, Y. (2009), "Evolutionary many-objective optimization by NSGA-II and MOEA/D with large populations", IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Miyazaki, Japan, October.
  14. Lee, D.H., Min, K.S. and Kang, J.H. (2014), "Performance evaluation and sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff", Water Sci. Technol., 69(10), 2122-2131. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.125
  15. Lee, E.J, Maniquiz, M.C., Gorme, J.B., Kim, L.H. (2010), "Determination of cost-effective first flush criteria for BMP sizing", Desalination Water Treat., 19(1-3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1909
  16. Lee, J.G., Selvakumar, A., Alvi, K., Riverson, J. and Zhen, J.X. (2012), "A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices", Environ. Modell. Softw., 37, 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.011
  17. Liu, Y., Ahiablame, L.M., Bralts, V.F. and Engel, B.A. (2015), "Enhancing a rainfall-runoff model to assess the impacts of BMPs and LID practices on storm runoff", J. Environ. Manag., 147, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.005
  18. Meierdiercks, K.L., Smith, J.A., Baeck, M.L. and Miller, A.J. (2010), "Analyses of urban drainage network structure and its impact on hydrologic response", J. American Water Resour. Assoc., 45(5), 932-943.
  19. Perez-Pedini, C., Limbrunner, J.F. and Vogel, R.M. (2005), "Optimal location of infiltration-based best management practices for storm water management", J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag., 131(6), 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:6(441)
  20. Rosa, D.J., Clausen, J.C. and Dietz, M.E. (2015), "Calibration and verification of SWMM for low impact development", J. American Water Resour. Assoc., 51(3), 746-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12272
  21. Rossman, L.A. (2010), "Storm water management model user's manual version 5.1", PA/600/R-50/040; National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
  22. Roy, A.H., Wenger, S.J., Fletcher, T.D., Walsh, C.J., Ladson, A.R., Shuster, W.D., Thurston, H.W. and Brown, R.R. (2008), "Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States", Environ. Manag., 42(2), 344-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1
  23. Subramanian, N.K., Tingyu, L. and Seng, Y.A. (2005), "Optimizing warpage analysis for an optimal housing", Mechatronics, 15(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2004.05.004
  24. Tobio, J.A.S., Maniquiz-Redillas, M.C. and Kim, L.H. (2015), "Optimization of the design of an urban runoff treatment system using stormwater management model (SWMM)", Desalination Water Treat., 53(11), 3134-3141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.922288
  25. U.S. DOL (2018), "Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index inflation", U.S.A. www.bls.gov/data/inflation_caclulator.htm.
  26. U.S. EPA (1999), "Storm water technology fact sheet hydrodynamic separators", EPA 832-F-99-017; Office of Water, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
  27. U.S. EPA (2010), "Storm water management model user's manual", EPA/600/R-5/040; Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, U.S.A.
  28. Vale, D.R., Attwater, K.B. and O'Loughlin, G.G. (1986), "Application of SWMM to two urban catchments in Sydney", Proceedings of the 17th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium on Institution of Engineers, Brisbane, Australia.
  29. Weiss, P.T., Gulliver, J.S. and Erickson, A.J. (2005), "The cost and effectiveness of stormwater management practices", MN/RC-2005-23; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, U.S.A.
  30. Xu, T., Jia, H., Wang, Z., Mao, X. and Xu, C. (2017), "SWMM-based methodology for block-scale LID-BMPs planning based on site-scale multi-objective optimization: A case study in Tianjin", Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 11(4), 1-10.
  31. Yuan, W., Okrent, D. and Stenstrom, M.K., (1993), "Model calibration for the high-purity oxygen activated sludge process-Algorithm development and evaluation", Water Sci. Technol., 28(11-12), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1993.0656
  32. Zhang, K. and Chui, T.F.M. (2018), "A comprehensive review of spatial allocation of LID-BMP-GI practices: Strategies and optimization tools", Sci. Total Environ., 621, 915-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.281
  33. Zhen, X., Yu, S.L. and Lin, J. (2004), "Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins as watershed scale", J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag., 130(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:4(339)

Cited by

  1. Comparison of pollutants in stormwater runoff from asphalt and concrete roads vol.12, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2021.12.5.253