대한건축학회논문집:구조계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction)

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.37-46
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-9107(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1788(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP를 이용한 군 행정시설 기능공간 특성분석

Analyzing the Features of Functional Spaces on Military Administrative Facilities using Analytical Hierarchy Process

  • 투고 : 2018.09.21
  • 심사 : 2018.12.17
  • 발행 : 2019.01.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In order to present the enhancement direction for the military administrative facilities, that can satisfy the user demands and achieve cost-effectiveness the goal of public projects, this research analyzes the features of functional spaces using Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP). Basically, the scope is selected to four facilities commander office, private office, public office, and meeting room, because they have an effect on military administrative facilities. Since the space is established by a combination of their own functions, this research begins with an analysis of functional spaces of military administrative facilities, which is verified through literature review and interview with expert. Thereafter, an AHP survey is conducted to military personnel to analyze the priority of functional spaces and to re-classify the functional spaces of each Military administrative facilities. Resultingly, the difference of functional spaces preference according to ranks and facility type are identified. Even though the same military facilities, it means that user satisfaction is different. Therefore, user satisfaction should be considered for each facility at the construction plan. It can minimize overlapped and unused spaces, which can help ensure cost-effectiveness. Consequently, this research suggested the methodology and the process that can take user satisfaction and can support the enhancement of military facilities standards.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. Byun, N. H., Lim, Y. K., Lee, H. Y., & Gwak, S. N. (2017). Planning Issues and Suggestions for Improvement of Public Office Building, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  2. Department of Defense of United States of America (2014). Unified Facilities Criteria(UFC) 4-610-01: Administration Facilities.
  3. Department of the Air-Force of United States of America (2016). Air-Force Manual 32-1084: Civil Engineering Facility Requirements.
  4. Department of the Army of United States of America (2006). Army Regulation 405-70: Real Estate Utilization of Real Property.
  5. Department of the Navy & Marine of United States of America (2017). Unified Facilities Criteria(UFC) 2-000-05N: Facility Planning for Navy and Marine Corps Shore Installations: Appendix F, Austere Facilities(Navy).
  6. Go, S. S., Song, H., Lee, H. M., & Lee, H. C. (2007). A Study on the Priority of Residents' Demands during Apartment House Remodeling Stage using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process): Focused on Apartment Houses in Gwangju City, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 23(6), 163-170.
  7. Jang, M. H., & Lee, H. S. (2002). A Method of Evaluating and Selecting Alternatives of Temporary Facility Planning in High-rise Building Projects, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 18(12), 143-150.
  8. Kim, H. S. (2012). Analyzing Housing Determinants of Seoul Residents Using AHP, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(1), 227-235.
  9. Kim, S. H., & Um, W. J. (2010). A Study on the Design Quality of Public Buildings with Indicator Management System, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  10. Kwon, S. J., & Joo, S. H. (2011). A Study on the proportion of functional Areas in the ward of General Hospitals, Journal of the Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture, 17(4), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.15682/JKIHA.2011.17.4.049
  11. Law of the Ministry of the Interior and Safety No. 1, (2017). Criteria of the Government Office Building's Space Acquisition and Allocation.
  12. Lee, D. U., & Kim, Y. S. (2003). A Study on the Cost Risk Analysis for Construction Projects using Fuzzy-AHP Method, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 19(4), 169-176.
  13. Lee, J. S., Yang, S. H., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A Study on the User's Satisfaction on the Circulation and Allocation of Facilities According to the Location according to tracks and Types of Railroad Station, Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 15(6), 13-20.
  14. Lee, S. M., Kim, J. W., & Lee, M. W. (2009). The Study on Management Strategy with Public Buildings for Efficient Creation, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  15. Ministry of National Defense (2018). Defense Military Facilities Criteria 3-30-10: Architectural Floor Space Criteria.
  16. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority, Setting, Resource Allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
  17. Shen, Q., Lo, K. K., & Wang, Q. (1998). Priority Setting in Maintenance Management: A Modified Multi-Attribute Approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Construction Management and Economics, 16, 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998371980
  18. Shin, D. J., Lee, S. H., & Lim, C. Z. (2009). A Study on the Lay-out Type of Faculty Space in Library, Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(1), 165-179.
  19. Skibniewski, M. J., & Chao, L. C. (1992). Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(3), 577-593. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(577)
  20. Tchah, C. Y., & Kim, E. H. (2014). A Study on Improvement of Planning Criteria for Public Office Buildings, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  21. Youm, C. H., & Lim, H. S. (2010). Establishment of Architectural Process Design Guideline for Public Office Buildings, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.