Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategies for Implementation of Neighborhood unit Plan - Focused on the City of Seattle and Yokohama -

근린단위 도시계획의 실행방안에 관한 연구 - 시애틀시와 요코하마시를 대상으로 -

  • Lee, Bo Ram (Urban Research Center, Seoul Housing & Communities Corporation)
  • 이보람 (서울주택도시공사 도시연구원)
  • Received : 2018.04.20
  • Accepted : 2018.12.10
  • Published : 2019.01.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the city planning is to share the future image of the area where all citizens sympathize and to function as tools to implement a policy. Recently, the city of Seoul has established the community plan to manage the city as neighborhood units, but there are several issues that need to be addressed, such as lack of practical strategies. Therefore, this study studied the neighborhood unit plan in terms of feasibility. The comparative analysis is the masterplan of the City of Seattle in the U.S and the city of Yokohama in Japan, which are known to accomplish advanced urban planning. As a result, three factors were needed; there are 1) a masterplan that acts as an action plan, 2) administrative support tools such as financial and human resources that encourage people to participate in urban planning with enthusiasm, and 3) a management system that continuously manages the plan itself. This result is expected to be a reference for the establishment of method for the implementation of neighborhood unit plan in Seoul.

Keywords

References

  1. Akimoto, Y., Ishizu, K. (2005). Proposal institutions for Developing Community in Yokohama City, City Planning Review, vol.54(6), 50-55.
  2. Akita, N. (2007). A Study on Coordination between Community Plans and Community Developments: Case study on Hadano city yard agreements and Yokohama city Machibushin developments based on ordinances, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, No.42(3), 667-672.
  3. Azuma, T., Suzuki, I., Yamada, T., Koizumi, H., Watanabe, S., & Amano, T. (2000). The Consensus and Efficiency of Neighborhood Planning Program, the city of Seattle, US.:for Ensuring Effectiveness by Plan Progress Control Chart(米国シアトル市近隣計画プログラムにおける合意性と実効性:計画進行管理表による実効性の確保), Architectural Institute of Japan, Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting, F-1, 319.
  4. Ceraso, K. (1999). Seattle Neighborhood Planning: Citizen Empowerment of Collective Daydreaming from https://shelterforce.org/1999/11/01/seattle-neighborhood-planning/
  5. Choi, J., Yang, J., & Kim, C. (2006). A Study on the Management and Improvement of Sub-Regional Plan in Seoul, Seoul Studies, vol.7, No.3, 31-50.
  6. Diers, J. (2006). Neighbor power: building community the seattle way, University of Washington Press, 18-30.
  7. Funatogawa, M., Goto, T., Watanabe, S., & Koizumi, H. (1997). The Planning Process System by the Neighborhood: focused on Neighborhood Planning Program, the City of Seattle(住民主体型計画公定システム:米国シアトル市近隣計画策定プログラムに着目して), Architectural Institute of Japan, Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting, F-1, 415.
  8. Kim, C. (2011). A Study on Operational Status and Characteristics of Local Machizukuri Ordinance in Yokohama City, Japan, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol.27(5), 195-202.
  9. Kim, J., You, H. (2017). A Study of an Urban Regeneration System focused on the Integrated Operation of a Community Organization with their Local Plan, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol.19(5), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2017.33.4.31
  10. Konishi, M. (2000). A Study of the process of making Master Plan in Yokohama City, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, No.35, 229-234.
  11. Murayama, A., Koisumi, H., & Okata, J. (2001). The Evolution of Discussion and Activities over Downtown Seattle Planning: 1960-2000, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, No.36, 307-312.
  12. Nakamura, K., Takamizawa, M., & Danzuka, T. (2003). A Study on Making the Development Plan and Promoting the Local Community Building Activity in Yokohama, Report of the City Planning Institute of Japan, No.1(3), 84-87.
  13. Sakaguchi, Y., Koizumi, H., Ito, F., & Watanabe, S. (2001). The Consistency between Commonality and Publicness in Neighborhood Planning Program, the City of Seattle, USA, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, No.36, 31-36.
  14. Seattle Office of the City Auditor. (2007). Time to Revisit Neighborhood Plan Implementation, Seattle Neighborhood Planning Office
  15. Sirianni, C. (2007). Neighborhood Planning as Collaborative Democratic Design, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol.73, No.4, 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708978519
  16. Uchida, N. (2007). The Role of Neighborhood District Coordinators in the City of Seattle, Urban Planning Review, vol.265, No.1, 90.
  17. Uzuki, M. (2016). Valuation of Civil Community Building Project in Yokohama, City Planning Review, vol.323, 52-55.
  18. Uchida, N., Satoh, S. (2005). The Effectiveness of the Community-fund on the Promotion of Community-led Developments: A case of the neighborhood matching fund of the city of Seattle, Architectural Institute of Japan, No.594, 101-108.
  19. Yang, J. (2010). A Comparative Study on the Operational Systems of the Master Plans in World Cities, The Seoul Development Institute.
  20. Yang, J., Nam, S. (2015). A Planning Monitoring Study on the Community Plan of Seoul, The Seoul Institute.
  21. Yang, J., Seong, S. (2017). A Study on the Implementation and Operation of the Community Plan in Seoul, The Seoul Institute.
  22. Yang, J., Kim, I. (2011). A Study on the Introduction and Implementation of the Local Development Plan in Seoul, Seoul Development Institute.
  23. http://www.seattle.gov/
  24. http://www.city.yokohama.jp/