DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seminal Attributes and Semen Cryo-banking of Nepalese Indigenous Achhami (Bos indicus) Bull under Ex-situ Conservation

  • Received : 2019.09.26
  • Accepted : 2019.12.26
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the seminal attributes and cryobanking of Achhami (Bos indicus) bull semen. Of two Achhami bulls, 8 ejaculates from each bull were evaluated for seminal attributes. For semen freezing and cryo-banking, 4 ejaculates (having ≥2 mL semen volume, ≥75% of sperm motility and ≥1,000 × 106 cells/mL of sperm concentration) from each bull were used. Semen samples were diluted in egg-yolk-tris-citrate extender using a two-step dilution protocol, and were frozen in liquid nitrogen (LN2) vapour in a styrofoam box. The mean semen volume, colour, sperm mass activity, motility, viability, concentration, abnormal acrosome, midpiece and tail and, abnormal head of two Achhami bulls were 4.4 ± 0.5 mL vs. 2.5 ± 0.2 mL, 2.5 ± 0.1 vs. 2.4 ± 0.1, 3.5 ± 0.1 vs. 3.5 ± 0.1, 77.0 ± 1.1% vs. 78.3 ± 1.3%, 94.4 ± 0.5% vs. 91.0 ± 0.6%, 1137.7 ± 73.7 × 106 cells/mL vs. 1060.0 ± 44.3 × 106 cells/mL, 10.2 ± 0.5% vs. 10.3 ± 0.5% and 6.7 ± 0.5% vs. 8.2 ± 0.3%, respectively. The post-thawed sperm motility and viability were 53.0 ± 2.0% vs. 50.0 ± 0.0% and 80.2 ± 0.4% vs. 73.2 ± 0.7%, while evaluating by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system, the percentage of the progressive motility, fast motility, slow motility, local motility and immotile sperm were 75%, 68%, 7.4%, 16.6% and 8.6%, respectively. A total number of 620 doses semen straw were cryo-banked. Due to the acceptable post-thawed sperm motility and viability recorded, cryopreservation of Achhami semen is hereby recommended so as to preserve the Achhami breed. For further validation, the fertility will be observed from the produced frozen semen.

Keywords

References

  1. Almquist JO, Rosenberger JL and Branas RJ. 1979. Effect of thawing time in warm water on fertility of bovine spermatozoa in plastic straws. J. Dairy Sci. 62:772-775. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83322-6
  2. Bailey JL, Bilodeau J and Cormier N. 2000. Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: A damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J. Androl. 21:1-7.
  3. Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, Raina VS, Gupta AK, Khan HM, Mahapatra RK and Sarkar M. 2011. Effect of age and season on semen quality parameters in Sahiwal bulls. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 43:1161-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9817-1
  4. Bhattacharyya HK, Goswami BK, Bujarbaruah KM, Deka BC and Biwas RK. 2009. Collection and characterization of semen in Mithun (Bos frontalis) bulls. Theriogenology 72:699-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.05.010
  5. Bramhaiah KV, Rao VH, Rao AS, Naidu KV and Viroji Rao ST. 2013. Semen characteristics of Punganur bulls. Indian J. Anim. Res. 47:45-48.
  6. Chauhan FS, Matharoo JS, Takkar OP and Singh M. 1983. Semen characteristics, deep freezing of semen and reproductive performance of crossbred cattle. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 36:96-100.
  7. De Lucio AC, Ferraudo AS, Oliveria de LZ, Carno de AS, Pereira W, Carneio LC, Lima de VFMH, Almedia S, Deragon LA, Alves BG and Alves KA. 2014. Exploratory analysis of difference in sperm morphology in Nelore and Gir (Bos indicus) bulls. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 46:765-770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0561-1
  8. Dhurvey M, Gupta VK, Nema SP, Patidar A, Shivhare M, Singh N and Shakya V. 2012. Modern semen evaluation techniques in domestic animals: a review. DHR-IJBLS. 3:62-83.
  9. Farooq U, Ija A, Ahmad N, Rehman H and Zaneb H. 2013. Investigation of semen quality and freezability of cholistani breeding bull- A preliminary study from Cholistani desert of Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 23:359-363.
  10. Fiaz M, Usmani RH, Abdullah M and Ahmad T. 2010. Evaluation of semen quality of Holstein Friesian and Jersey bulls maintained under subtropical environment. Pak. Vet. J. 30:75-78.
  11. Gaillard C and Kupferschmied H. 1982. Thawing time and nonreturn rate of bovine semen frozen in fine French straws. Theriogenology 18:487-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(82)90170-4
  12. Hafez ESE. 1980. Artificial Insemination. Reproduction in farm animal. 4th ed, Lea and Febriger, Philadelphia, pp. 521-45.
  13. Hafez ESE. 1993. Reproduction in farm animals. 6th ed, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 405-439.
  14. Haugan T, Reksen O, Grohn YT, Kommisrud E, Ropstad E and Sehested E. 2005. Seasonal effects of semen collection and artificial insemination on dairy cow conception. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 90:57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.02.002
  15. Hossain ME, Khatun MM, Islam MM and Miazi OF. 2012. Semen characteristics of breeding bulls at the Central Cattle Breeding and Dairy Farm of Bangladesh. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 41:1-5. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v41i1.11968
  16. Jha PK, Paul AK, Rahman MB, Tanjim M, Bari FY and Alam MGS. 2013. Improvement of preservation quality of chilled bull semen using ${\alpha}$-tocopherol as an antioxidant. J. Emb. Trans. 28:31-39. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2013.28.1.31
  17. Kaya A, Aksoy M and Tekeli T. 2002. Influence of ejaculation frequency on sperm characteristics, ionic composition and enzymatic activity of seminal plasma in rams. Small Rumin. Res. 44:153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00051-2
  18. Kedia NK, Tiwari RP, Mishra GK, Poyam MR, Pandey AK, Nair AK and Sahasrabhude SA. 2014. Characteristics and Freezability of Tharparkar bull semen. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 84:382-388.
  19. Lagerlof N. 1934. Morphological studies on the change in the sperm structure and in the testis of bulla with decreased or abolished fertility. APMIS. 19:254.
  20. Madhuri D, Gupta V, Nema S, Patidar A, Shivhare M, Singh N and Shakya V. 2012. Modern semen evaluation techniques in domestic animals: A review. DHR Int. J. Biomed. Life Sci. 3:62-83.
  21. Medeiros CM, Forell F, Oliveira AT and Rodrigues JL. 2002. Current status of sperm cryopreserva-tion: why isn't it better? Theriogenology 57:327-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00674-4
  22. Mishra SR, Kundu AK and Mahapatra APK. 2013. Effect of ambient temperature on membrane integrity of spermatozoa in different breeds of bulls. The Bioscan 8:181-183.
  23. Nath KC, Ahmed K, Dutta G, Barthakur T and Borgohain BN. 1996. Semen quality and release of certain enzymes during the course of freezing bull spermatozoa. Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 17:130-131.
  24. Neopane PN and Pokharel PK. 2005. Indigenous cattle of Nepal. Animal Breeding Division, National Animal Science Research Institute (NASRI), Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Kathmandu, Nepal, p. 2-8.
  25. Notter DR, Lucas JR, McClaugherty FS and Copenhaver JS. 1985. Breed group differences in testicular growth patterns in spring-born lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 60:622-631. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1985.603622x
  26. Patel BR and Siddiquee GM. 2013. Physical and morphological characteristics of Kankrej bull semen. Vet. World 6:405-408. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.405-408
  27. Rana CM and Dhami AJ. 2004. Physical attributes, intact acrosome, HOS test and freezability of semen of Gir and Jafarabadi bulls. Indian Vet. J. 81:401-410.
  28. Robinson JJ, Ashworth CJ, Rooke JA, Mitchell LM and Mc Evoy TG. 2006. Nutrition and fertility in ruminant livestock. Anim. F. Sci. Tech. 126:259-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.006
  29. Salamon S and Maxwell WM. 2000. Storage of ram semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62:77-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00155-X
  30. Salvador DF, Andrade VJ, Vale Filho VR, Dias JC and Nogueira LAG. 2008. Relationship between andrologic profile and semen freezing in two year old Nellore bulls, pre select by breeding soundness evaluation. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 60:587-593. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352008000300010
  31. Shrestha SL and Shrestha NP. 1998. Indigenous cattle genetic resources. Proceedings of the first national workshop on animal genetic resources conservation and genetic improvement of domestic animals in Nepal. Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal, pp. 16-19.
  32. Siddiqui MAR, Bhattacharjee J, Das ZC, Islam MM, Islam MA, Haque MA, Parrish JJ and Shamsudin M. 2008. Cross bred bull selection for bigger scrotum and shorter age at puberty with potentials for better quality semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 43:74-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01145.x
  33. Singh DM and Pangawkar GR. 1990. Studies on semen characteristics of exotic and crossbred bulls spermatozoa. Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 11:92-95.
  34. Sugulle AH, Bhuiyan MMU and Shamsuddin M. 2006. Breeding soundness of bull and the quality of their frozen semen used in cattle artificial insemination in Bangladesh. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 18:54.
  35. Tiwari R, Mishra GK, Singh RB, Rehman SU, Rathora KS, Saxena SK and Siddiqui MU. 2012. Seasonal variations in the quality and freezability of Red Sindhi bull semen. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 82:1344-1346.
  36. Toe F, Rege JEO, Mukasa-Mugerwa E, Tembely S, Anindo D, Baker RL and Lahlou-Kassi A. 2000. Reproductive characteristics of Ethiopian highland sheep I.: genetic parameters of testicular measurements in ram lambs and relationship with age at puberty in ewe lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 36:227-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00117-0
  37. Veeraiah G, Venugopal K and Rao KB. 1999. Effect of various level of glycerol and egg yolk in freezing of Ongole bull semen. Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 20:149-152.
  38. Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M and Onclin K, 2002. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology re-search and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57:149-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00664-1
  39. Vilakazi DM and Webb EC. 2004. Effect of age and season on sperm morphology of Friesland bulls at an artificial insemination centre in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Anim Sci. 34:62-69.
  40. Wagle S. 2019. Institutional Strengthening and Awareness Raising for Sustainable Conservation of Critically Endangered Achhami Cattle, Nepal. The Ruffor Foundation.