DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selection on milk production and conformation traits during the last two decades in Japan

  • Received : 2018.03.28
  • Accepted : 2018.07.05
  • Published : 2019.02.01

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare intended and actual yearly genetic gains for milk production and conformation traits and to investigate the simple selection criterion practiced among milk production and conformation traits during the last two decades in Japan. Learning how to utilize the information on intended and actual genetic gains during the last two decades into the genomic era is vital. Methods: Genetic superiority for each trait for four paths of selection (sires to breed bulls [SB], sires to breed cows [SC], dams to breed bulls [DB], and dams to breed cows [DC]) was estimated. Actual practiced simple selection criteria were investigated among milk production and conformation traits and relative emphasis on milk production and conformation traits was compared. Results: Selection differentials in milk production traits were greater than those of conformation traits in all four paths of selection. Realized yearly genetic gain was less than that intended for milk production traits. Actual annual genetic gain for conformation traits was equivalent to or greater than intended. Retrospective selection weights of milk production and conformation traits were 0.73:0.27 and 0.56:0.44 for intended and realized genetic gains, respectively. Conclusion: Selection was aimed more toward increasing genetic gain in milk production than toward conformation traits over the past two decades in Japan. In contrast, actual annual genetic gain for conformation traits was equivalent to or greater than intended. Balanced selection between milk production and conformation traits tended to be favored during actual selection. Each of four paths of selection (SB, SC, DB, and DC) has played an individual and important role. With shortening generation interval in the genomic era, a young sire arises before the completion of sire's daughters' milk production records. How to integrate these four paths of selection in the genomic era is vital.

Keywords

References

  1. Hintz RL, Van Vleck LD. Estimation of genetic trends from cow and sire evaluations. J Dairy Sci 1978;61:607-13. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(78)94417-X
  2. Lee KL, Freeman AE, Johnson LP. Estimation of genetic change in the registered Holstein cattle population. J Dairy Sci 1985; 68:2629-38. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81147-4
  3. Powell RL, Norman HD, Dickinson FN. Trends in breeding value and production. J Dairy Sci 1977;60:1316-26. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)84029-0
  4. Rendel JM, Robertson A. Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. J Genet 1950; 50:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986789
  5. James JW. Construction, uses and problems of multi-trait selection indices. Proceeding of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; Madrid, Spain. 1982. pp. 130-9.
  6. Dickerson GE, Blunn CT, Chapman AG, et al. Evaluation of developing inbred lines of swines. Columbia, MO, USA: University of Missouri; 1954. Res Bull 551.
  7. Allaire FR, Henderson CR. Selection practiced among dairy cows. II. Total production over a sequence of lactations. J Dairy Sci 1966;49:1435-40. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)88106-7
  8. Nippon Livestock Breeding Center. Bulletin of the dairy sire and cow evaluation (in Japanese). 2017;37:169.
  9. van Tassell CP, van Vleck LD. Estimates of genetic selection differentials and generation intervals for four paths of selection. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:1078-86. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78258-1
  10. Henderson CR. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph, ON, Canada: University of Guelph; 1984.
  11. Burnside EB, Jansen GB, Civati G, et al. Observed and theoretical genetic trends in a large dairy population under intensive selection. J Dairy Sci 1992;75:2242-53. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77985-5
  12. Nippon Livestock Breeding Center. Donor testing system [cited 2018 January 7]. Available from http://www.nlbc.go.jp/iwate/kachikukairyo/hansyoku/hansyoku-tech.html
  13. Nicholas FW, Smith, C. Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Anim Prod 1983; 36:341-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100010382
  14. Jamrozik J, Kistemaker GJ, Dekkers JCM, et al. Comparison of possible covariates for use in a random regression model for analyses of test day yields. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:2550-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76210-6
  15. Togashi K, Lin CY, Atagi Y, et al. Genetic characteristics of Japanese Holstein cows based on multiple-lactation random regression test-day animal models. Livest Sci 2008;114:194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.023
  16. Livestock Improvement Association of Japan. Dairy herd improvement records summary 2014 [cited 2018 June 7]. Available from: http://liaj.lin.gr.jp/japanese/newmilkset.html
  17. Livestock Improvement Association of Japan. Questionnaire survey of dairy farmers for strengthening operating foundations. Tokyo, Japan: LIAJ Press; 2007.
  18. Sewalem A, Kistemaker GJ, Miglior F. Relationship between female fertility and production traits in Canadian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:4427-34. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2915
  19. Tiezzi F, Maltecca C, Cecchinato A, et al. Genetic parameters for fertility of dairy heifers and cows at different parities and relationships with production traits in first lactation. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:7355-62. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5775
  20. Pesek J, Baker RJ. Desired improvement in relation to selected indices. Can J Plant Sci 1969;49:803-4. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps69-137