DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SOx and NOx removal performance by a wet-pulse discharge complex system

습식-펄스방전 복합시스템의 황산화물 및 질소산화물 제거성능 특성

  • Park, Hyunjin (R&D Department, BellE&C Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Whanyoung (R&D Department, BellE&C Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Park, Munlye (R&D Department, BellE&C Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Noh, Hakjae (R&D Department, BellE&C Co., Ltd.) ;
  • You, Junggu (R&D Department, BellE&C Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Han, Bangwoo (Environmental and Energy System Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials) ;
  • Hong, Keejung (Environmental and Energy System Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials)
  • 박현진 ((주)벨이앤씨 기술연구소) ;
  • 이환영 ((주)벨이앤씨 기술연구소) ;
  • 박문례 ((주)벨이앤씨 기술연구소) ;
  • 노학재 ((주)벨이앤씨 기술연구소) ;
  • 유정구 ((주)벨이앤씨 기술연구소) ;
  • 한방우 (한국기계연구원 환경기계시스템연구실) ;
  • 홍기정 (한국기계연구원 환경기계시스템연구실)
  • Received : 2019.03.04
  • Accepted : 2019.03.26
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Current desulfurization and denitrification technologies have reached a considerable level in terms of reduction efficiency. However, when compared with the simultaneous reduction technology, the individual reduction technologies have issues such as economic disadvantages due to the difficulty to scale-up apparatus, secondary pollution from wastewater/waste during the treatment process, requirement of large facilities for post-treatment, and increased installation costs. Therefore, it is necessary to enable practical application of simultaneous SOx and NOx treatment technologies to remove two or more contaminants in one process. The present study analyzes a technology capable of maintaining simultaneous treatment of SOx and NOx even at low temperatures due to the electrochemically generated strong oxidation of the wet-pulse complex system. This system also reduces unreacted residual gas and secondary products through the wet scrubbing process. It addresses common problems of the existing fuel gas treatment methods such as SDR, SCR, and activated carbon adsorption (i.e., low treatment efficiency, expensive maintenance cost, large installation area, and energy loss). Experiments were performed with varying variables such as pulse voltage, reaction temperature, chemicals and additives ratios, liquid/gas ratio, structure of the aeration cleaning nozzle, and gas inlet concentration. The performance of individual and complex processes using the wet-pulse discharge reaction were analyzed and compared.

Keywords

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Shape and overall configuration of the experimental apparatus.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Configuration and internal structure of the pulse discharge system.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Configuration and internal structure of the wet reaction system.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Shape and structure of the aeration cleaning nozzle for the wet reaction system.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Sample shape and structure of the aeration cleaning nozzle.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Distribution of bubble fraction of the aeration cleaning nozzle.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. NO removal performance of the pulse reaction system according to reaction temperature and additive conditions.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. NO removal performance of the wet-pulse complex system according to reducing agent molar ratio.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10. Changes in SO2 outlet concentration in the pulse reaction system according to additive(NH3) ratio.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 11. Comparison between removal performances of individual SO2, NH3 and complex cleaning reactions of the wet reaction system.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 12. Comparison of the NH3 slip removal performance of the wet-pulse discharge complex system.

Table 1. Specifications of the pulse discharge system.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Specifications of the wet reaction system.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Experimental conditions.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Flow analysis results of the aeration cleaning nozzle.

KKOSBF_2019_v15n1_1_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Chang, S.G., and Liu, D.K. (1990). Removal of nitrogen and sulphur oxides from waste gas using a phosphorous/alkali emulsion, Nature, 343, 151-153. https://doi.org/10.1038/343151a0
  2. Chang, S.G., and Lee, G.C. (1992). LBL PhoSNOX process of combined removal of $SO_2$ and NOx from flue gas, Environmental Progress, 11, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670110120
  3. Chang, C.S., and Rochelle, G.T. (1982). Mass transfer enhanced by equilibrium reactions, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 21, 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1021/i100008a011
  4. Chang, S.G., Littlejohn, D., and Liu, D.K. (1988). Use of ferrous chelates of SH-containing amino acids and peptides for the removal of NOx and $SO_2$ from flue gas, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 27, 2156-2161. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00083a033
  5. Kawamura, K., and Shui, V.H. (1984). Pilot plant experience in electron-beam treatment of iron-oer sintering flue gas and its application to coal boiler, Radiation Physics & Chemistry, 24, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-5724(84)90011-6
  6. Lee, Y.H., Jung, W.S., Choi, Y.R., Oh, J.S., Jang, S.D., Son, Y.G., Cho, M.H., Namkung, W., Koh, D.J., Mok, Y.S., and Chung, J.W. (2003). Application of pulsed corona induced plasma chemical process to an industrial incinerator, Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 2563-2567. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0261123
  7. Lin, D.K., and Chang, S.G. (1988). Removal of nitric oxide from flue gas using water-soluble iron(II) dithiocarbamates, Environmental Science & Technology, 22, 1196-1200. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00175a012
  8. Liu, D.K., Frick, L.P., and Chang, S.G. (1988). A ferrous cysteine based recycleable processes for the combined removal of NOx and $SO_2$ from flue gas, Environmental Science & Technology, 22, 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00167a015
  9. Stouffer, M.R., Wiyhum, J.A., and Rosenhoover, W.A. (1992). Advanced induct sorbent injection for $SO_2$ control, In Proceedings of eighth annual coal preparation, utilization, Environmental Control Contractors Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
  10. Shimizu, T., Asazuma, J., Shinkai, M., Matsunaga, S., Yamagiwa, K., and Fujiwara, N. (2003). Simultaneous reduction of NOx, $N_2O$, $SO_2$ emissions from a fluidized bed coal combustor using alternative bed material, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 36, 782-787. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.36.782
  11. Tu, M.D., and Chang, S.D. (1987). Chemistry of a flue gas combined NOx and $SO_2$ scrubber employing ferrous cysteine additives, Environmental Progress, 6, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670060124
  12. Tseng, S., Smith, K., Lani, B., Carson, W., Berisko, D., and Schultz, C. (1992). Enhanced NOx removal in wet scrubbers using metal chelates-testing at miami fort pilot plant, In Proceedings of eighth annual coal preparation, utilization, Environmental Control Contractors Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
  13. Tsuji, K., and Shiraishi, I. (1997). Combined desulfurization, denitrification and reduction of air toxics using activates coke, Fuel, 76, 549-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00010-0
  14. Walker, R.J., Garr-Peters, J.M., and Perry, M.B. (1992). High removal wet scrubbing of $SO_2$ and NOx using electrodialysis and chemical reduction for regeneration, In Proceedings of eighth annual coal preparation, utilization, Environmental Control Contractors Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
  15. Weast, R.C. (1987). CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics, 68th ed., p2464, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
  16. Yamamoto, T., Okubo, M., Nakao, T., and Hayakawa, K. (2002). Simultaneous removal of NOx, $SO_2$, and $CO_2$ at elevated temperature using a plasma-chemical hybrid process, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 38, 1168-1173. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2002.802911