DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of reducing sugar content, sensory traits, and fatty acids and volatile compound profiles of the longissimus thoracis among Korean cattle, Holsteins, and Angus steers

  • Piao, Min Yu (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Jung (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yong, Hae In (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Beak, Seok-Hyeon (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Jin (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jo, Cheorun (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Wiryawan, Komang Gede (Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Bogor Agricultural University) ;
  • Baik, Myunggi (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2018.01.18
  • Accepted : 2018.06.29
  • Published : 2019.01.01

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to compare fat content, reducing sugar contents, sensory traits, and fatty acid (FA) and volatile compound profiles in longissimus thoracis (LT) among Korean cattle (KC), Holstein (HO), and Angus (AN) steers. Methods: Twelve LT samples (about 500 g each) of KC with an average age of $31{\pm}0.42months$, an average carcass weight of $431{\pm}12.5kg$, and a quality grade (QG) of 1+ were obtained from the joint livestock products market. Twelve LT samples of HO cattle with an average age of $24{\pm}0.54months$, an average carcass weight of $402{\pm}7.81kg$, and a QG of 2 were also obtained from the same market. Twelve LT samples of AN steers with an average age of about 20 months and a QG of choice were purchased from a beef delivery company. After slaughter, samples were kept at $4^{\circ}C$ for 42 days and prepared for immediate analysis or stored at appropriate conditions. The chemical composition, color, pH, shear force, collagen content, reducing sugars, sensory evaluation, FA composition, and volatile compound content for each LT sample were analyzed. Results: The LT of KC had the highest (p<0.05) fat content, the highest reducing sugar content, and the highest scores in the sensory evaluation (flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptance). All the sensory traits were positively correlated (p<0.001) with intramuscular fat and reducing sugar content. Several FAs and volatile compound profiles varied among the breeds. KC LT had the highest (p<0.05) concentrations of acetaldehyde, 3-methyl butanal, and 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, and these volatile compounds were positively correlated (p<0.05) with all the sensory traits. Conclusion: Variations in fat content and reducing sugar contents and FA and volatile compound profiles may contribute to differences in the sensory quality of LT among breeds.

Keywords

References

  1. MAFRA. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2015 [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: http://lib.mafra.go.kr
  2. Chung KY, Lee SH, Cho SH, Kwon EG, Lee JH. Current situation and future prospects for beef production in South Korea - A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:951-60. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0187
  3. KREI. Future agriculture prospect. Naju, South Korea: Korean Rural Economic Institute; 2016.
  4. Kim DH, Kim YK, Chung YH, Yoo YM, Park BY. A study on the consumer's attitude to beef: 1. Consumer's purchasing pattern and preference. J Agric Sci 1993;35:598-601.
  5. Kodani Y, Miyakawa T, Komatsu T, Tanokura M. NMR-based metabolomics for simultaneously evaluating multiple determinants of primary beef quality in Japanese Black cattle. Sci Rep 2017;7:1297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01272-8
  6. Joo ST, Kim GD, Hwang YH, Ryu YC. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci 2013;95:828-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.044
  7. Ba HV, Amna T, Hwang IH. Significant influence of particular unsaturated fatty acids and pH on the volatile compounds in meat-like model systems. Meat Sci 2013;94:480-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.029
  8. Hwang YH, Joo ST. Fatty acid profiles, meat quality, and sensory palatability of grain-fed and grass-fed beef from Hanwoo, American, and Australian crossbred cattle. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 2017;37:153-61. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.2.153
  9. Watkins PJ, Rose G, Warner RD, Dunshea FR, Pethick DW. A comparison of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with simultaneous distillation-extraction (SDE) for the analysis of volatile compounds in heated beef and sheep fats. Meat Sci 2012;91:99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.12.004
  10. Gorska E, Nowicka K, Jaworska D, Przybylski W, Tambor K. Relationship between sensory attributes and volatile compounds of polish dry-cured loin. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30: 720-7. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0252
  11. Ba HV, Ryu KS, Hwang IH. Flavor characteristics of Hanwoo beef in comparison with other Korean foods. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2012;25:435-46. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11286
  12. Choi CB, Kwon H, Kim SI, et al. Effects of rice bran, flax seed, and sunflower seed on growth performance, carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, free amino acid and peptide contents, and sensory evaluations of native Korean cattle (Hanwoo). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:195-203. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0264
  13. Neethling J, Hoffman LC, Muller M. Factors influencing the flavor of game meat: a review. Meat Sci 2016;113:139-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.11.022
  14. Aliani M, Farmer LJ. Postcolumn derivatization method for determination of reducing and phosphorylated sugars in chicken by high performance liquid chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 2002;50:2760-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011335i
  15. KAPE. Report of Business for Animal Products Grading. Gunpo, Korea: Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation; 2013.
  16. KAPE. Report of Business for Animal Products Grading. Gunpo, Korea: Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation; 2016.
  17. AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 15th edn, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA: AOAC International; 1996.
  18. Piao MY, Jo C, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of carcass and sensory traits and free amino acid contents among quality grades in loin and rump of Korean cattle steer. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1629-40. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0128
  19. Kim CJ, Lee ES. Effects of quality grade on the chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) beef. Meat Sci 2003;63:397-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00099-2
  20. Jayasena DD, Jung S, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of quality traits of meat from Korean native chickens and broilers used in two different traditional Korean cuisines. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013;26:1038-46. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12684
  21. Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. Handbook of Experiments in Food Science and Nutrition. Seoul, Korea: Hyoil Publishing Co.; 2000.
  22. Piao MY, Yong HI, Lee HJ, et al. Comparison of fatty acid profiles and volatile compounds among quality grades and their association with carcass characteristics in longissimus dorsi and semimembranosus muscles of Korean cattle steer. Livest Sci 2017;198:147-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.02.021
  23. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957;226:497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5
  24. Cho SH, Seong PN, Kang GH, Park BY, Jung SG. Meat quality and nutritional properties of Hanwoo and imported Australian beef. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 2011;31:772-81. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2011.31.5.772
  25. Destefanis G, Brugiapaglia A, Barge MT, Dal Molin E. Relationship between beef consumer tenderness perception and Warner-Bratzler shear force. Meat Sci 2008;78:153-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.05.031
  26. Obuz E, Dikeman ME, Grobbel JP, Stephens JW, Loughin TM. Beef longissimus lumborum, biceps femoris, and deep pectoralis Warner-Bratzler shear force is affected differently by endpoint temperature, cooking method, and USDA quality grade. Meat Sci 2004;68:243-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.003
  27. Mottram DS, Nobrega ICC. Formation of sulfur aroma compounds in reaction mixtures containing cysteine and three different forms of ribose. J Agric Food Chem 2002;50:4080-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0200826
  28. Ba HV, Hwang I, Jeong D, Touseef A. Principle of meat aroma flavors and future prospect. Latest research into quality control, Dr. Mohammad Saber Fallah Nezhad (Editor); 2012 [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/latest-research-into-quality-control/principle-of-meat-aroma-flavors-and-future-prospect.
  29. Aliani M, Farmer L. Precursors of chicken flavour II. Identification of key flavour precursors using sensory methods. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53:6455-62. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf050087d
  30. Raes K, Balcaen A, Dirinck P, et al. Meat quality, fatty acid composition and flavor analysis in Belgian retail beef. Meat Sci 2003;65:1237-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00031-7
  31. Jeong D, Oh MR, Seong PN, et al. Comparison of meat quality traits, free amino acid and fatty acid on longissimus lumborum muscles from Hanwoo, Holstein and Angus steers, fattened in Korea. Korean J Food Sci An 2012;32:591-7. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2012.32.5.591
  32. Anderson DA, Kisellan JA, Watt BK. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acid in beefs. J Am Diet Assoc 1975;67:35-41.
  33. Huang TC, Ho CT. Flavors and flavor generation of meat products. In: Hui YH, editor. Handbook of meat and meat processing. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2012. p. 109-16.
  34. Fujimaki M, Kato S, Kurata T. Pyrolysis of sulfur-containing amino acids. Agric Biol Chem 1969;33:1144-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1969.10859440
  35. Mottram. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review. Food Chem 1998;62:415-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4
  36. Shahidi F, Rubin LJ, Souza LA. Meat flavor volatiles: a review of the composition, techniques of analysis, and sensory evaluation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1986;24:141-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398609527435
  37. Min DB, Ina K, Peterson RJ, Chang SS. Preliminary identification of volatile flavor compounds in the neutral fraction of roast beef. J Food Sci 1979;44:639-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1979.tb08465.x
  38. Legako JF, Dinh TTN, Miller MF, Adhikari K, Brooks JC. Consumer palatability scores, sensory descriptive attributes, and volatile compounds of grilled beef steaks from three USDA quality grades. Meat Sci 2015;112:77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.018
  39. El-Magoli SB, Laroia S, Hansen PMT. Flavor and texture characteristics of low fat ground beef patties formulated with whey protein concentrate. Meat Sci 1996;42:179-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00032-1
  40. Mandell IB, Buchanan-Smith JG, Campbell CP. Effects of forage vs grain feeding on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and beef quality in Limousin-Cross steers when time on feed is controlled. J Anim Sci 1998;76:2619-30. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76102619x
  41. Garmyn AJ, Hilton GG, Mateescu RG, et al. Estimation of relationships between mineral concentration and fatty acid composition of longissimus muscle and beef palatability traits. J Anim Sci 2011;89:2849-58. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3497
  42. O'Quinn TG. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics [dissertation]. Fort Collins, CO, USA: Colorado State University; 2012.
  43. O’Quinn TG, Woerner DR, Engle TE, et al. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters. Meat Sci 2016;112:90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.11.001
  44. Giri A, Osaka K, Ohshima T. Identification and characterization of headspace volatiles of fish miso, a Japanese fish meat based fermented paste, with special emphasis on effect of fish species and meat washing. Food Chem 2010;120:621-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.10.036
  45. Machiels D, Istasse L, van Ruth SM. Gas chromatography - olfactometry analysis of beef meat originating from differently fed Belgian Blue, Limousin and Aberdeen Angus bulls. Food Chem 2004;86:377-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.011
  46. Kaseleht K, Leitner E, Paalme T. Determining aroma-active compounds in Kama flour using SPME-GC/MS and GC-olfactometry. Flavour Fragr J 2011;26:122-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.2032
  47. Wood JD, Richardson RI, Nute GR, et al. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci 2003;66:21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6
  48. Park SJ, Beak SH, Jung DJS, et al. Genetic, management, and nutritional factors affecting intramuscular fat deposition in beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1043-61. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0310

Cited by

  1. Optimization of 1D 1H Quantitative NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) Conditions for Polar Metabolites in Meat vol.39, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e54
  2. Determination of Point of Sale and Consumption for Hanwoo Beef Based on Quality Grade and Aging Time vol.39, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e11
  3. Effects of Aging and Aging Method on Physicochemical and Sensory Traits of Different Beef Cuts vol.39, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e3
  4. 경남지역 거세한우의 고급육 생산을 위한 도체 근육부위별 분포도 차이에 대한 연구 vol.43, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2020.43.2.45
  5. Fatty Acid Profile of Muscles from Crossbred Angus-Simmental, Wagyu-Simmental, and Chinese Simmental Cattles vol.40, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e33
  6. Effects of dietary glycerol inclusion on growth performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics, glycogen content, and meat volatile compounds in Korean cattle steers vol.34, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0186
  7. Volatilomics for halal and non-halal meatball authentication using solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry vol.14, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103146
  8. Profile of volatile compounds in frankfurters from culled goat meat during cold storage vol.45, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15410
  9. Effects of dietary amylose to amylopectin ratio on growth performance, carcass quality characteristics and meat fatty acids in Chinese Qinchuan cattle vol.20, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(20)63576-6
  10. Ruminant meat production and quality enhancement, nematode suppression and greenhouse gas emission mitigation: A sustainable paradigm for valorisation of Acacia leaves vol.284, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115187