한국임상보건과학회지 (Journal of Korean Clinical Health Science)

한국임상보건과학회 (The Korean Society of Clinical Health Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국인 노안 굴절상태 분석

Analysis of refraction status on the Presbyopia in Korea

  • 투고 : 2019.11.16
  • 심사 : 2019.12.11
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose. This study was the analyze the refractive status of presbyopia in Korea. Methods. The subjects was from November 2018 to October 2019, two hundred thirty four subjects( 117 male subjects, 117 female subjects; from 40-year old to 88-year old ) were performed in refraction test using the Auto-Refraction(Speed -K model, Japan). The myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia were defined as spherical equivalent(SE)≤-0.50 diopters, SE ≥+1.00 D, cylinder error ≥0.75 D and SE difference≥1.00 D between binocular eyes, respectively. Results. The refractive status by spherical equivalent among all subjects was myopia 61.43%, astigmatism 86.86%, emmetropia 19.18%, anisometropia 12.07%, and hyperopia 18.54. The prevalence of myopia and astigmatism were much more common in male. However, The hyperopia and astigmatism were much more common in female. The prevalence of spherical equivalent was much common from -0.50 diopter to -5.00 diopter. On the other hand, the prevalence of astigmatism and myopia was much more than hyperopia in all subjects. There was a statistical significance between OD and OS of the female and male in the spherical equivalent power(p<.000). However, there was not statical significant between female and male of OD and OS in the spherical equivalent power(p<.070). On the other hand, The prevalence of againest axis in astigmatism was more common in all subjects. In ADD power for the near vision correction, the female was much more diopter than male. Conclusions. These results suggested that the analysis of the refractive status on the presbyopia in Korea can give the useful diagnosis data for the correction of visual acuity at near distance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Org, 2004;82;844-851.
  2. Holden B, Fricke T, May Ho ,et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia, Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:731-739.
  3. Miranda MN, The geographic factor in the onset of presbyopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc;1979; 77; 603-621.
  4. Heidi RL, Fatma O, Hakika J, Garnia K, Clare G, Presbyopic spectacle coverage, Willingness to pay for near correction, and the impact of correcting uncorrected presbyopia in adults in Zanibar, East Africa, Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics; 2009;51(2):1234-1241.
  5. Guo Y1, Liu L, Xu L2, Lu Y, Tang P, Feng Y. Outdoor activity and myopia among 681 primary students in urban and rural regions of Beijing. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2014 21;94(3):191-4.
  6. Saw SM, Chau WH, Hong CY, et al. Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002; 43: 1408-1413.
  7. Saw SM, Katz J, Scheih OD, et al. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev,1996;18: 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017924
  8. Kim DH, Mercedita OA. Refractive error in 7-9 year-old Korea children. Journal of Korean Clinical Health Science, 2014; 2(3): 203-208. https://doi.org/10.15205/kschs.2014.2.3.203
  9. Ge W, Kristina TH, Roberta MC, Susan AC, Mark B, Jesse L, Jeniffer K, Robit V. Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group, Prevalence of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism in non-Hispanic white and Asian children: multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology, 120(10): 2013;2109-2116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.039
  10. Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. ophthalmology, 2008; 115: 1279-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019
  11. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 41: 2000; 2486-2494.
  12. Baldwin WR, Mills D. A longitudinal study of corneal astigmatism and total astigmatism. Am J Optom Physiol Opt, 1981; 58: 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198103000-00004
  13. Gwiazda J, Grice K, Held R, et al. Astigmatism and the development of mypia in children. Vision Res, 2000; 40: 1019-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00237-0
  14. Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis. Clin Exp Optom, 2007; 90: 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00112.x
  15. Sapkota K. A retrospective analysis of children with anisometropic amblyopia in Nepa. Strabismus, 2014 ;22(2):47-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273972.2014.904900
  16. Duarte WR, Barros AJD, Dias-da-Costa JS, Cattan JM. Prevalence of near vision deficiency and related factors: a population -based study in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica,2003;19:551-559. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2003000200022
  17. Ramke J, du Toit R, Palagyi A, Brian G, Naduvilath T. Correction of refractive error and presbyopia in Timor-Leste. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:860-866. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2006.110502
  18. Taylor HR, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YI, McCarty CA. Visual impairment in Australia: distance visual acuity , near vision, and visual field findings of the Melbourne Visual Impairmtne Project. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70128-X
  19. laitinen A, Koskinen S, Harkanen T, Reunanen A, Laatikainen I, Aromaa A. A nationwide population-based survey on visual acuity, near vision, and self reported visual function in the adult population in Finland. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:2227-2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.09.010
  20. Nimalan PK, Krishnaiah S, Shamanna BR, Rao GN, Thomas R. A population based assessment of presbyopia in the state of Andhra Pardesh, south India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study .Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47: 2324-2328. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1192