참고문헌
- Atwater, M. M., & Alick, B. (1990). Cognitive development and problem solving of Afro-American students in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270207
- Beaumont-Walters, Y., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students' performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087687
- Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449
- Berg, C. A., & Smith, P. (1994). Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Disparities between multiple-choice and freeresponse instruments. Science Education, 78(6), 527-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780602
- Bing, T. J., & Redish, E. F. (2006). The cognitive blending of math and physics knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2006 Physics Education Research Conference, Syracuse, NY, USA.
- Bing, T. J., & Redish, E. F. (2009). Analyzing problem solving using math in physics: Epistemological framing via warrants. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020108
- Brasell, H. M. (1990). Graphs, graphing, and graphers. What Research Says to the Science Teacher, 6, 69-85.
- Byun, T. (2012). An understanding of students' physics problem solving processes by using house model. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
- Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20 (2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014
- Chiu, M.-H. (2001). Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry by students at a local high school in Taiwan. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China Part D: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 20-38.
- Cho, S. (1993). A comparison of students' responses to everyday and scientific context problems about the particulate nature of matter. Master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
- Choi, J., & Heo, H. (2013). A study on formation of the process-object perspective of function using excel to specialized high school math underachievers. The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(2), 213-235.
- Cooper, M. M., Grove, N., Underwood, S. M., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2010). Lost in Lewis structures: An investigation of student difficulties in developing representational competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(8), 869-874. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed900004y
- Dori, Y. J., & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 219-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20197
- Ferguson, L. E., Braten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.002
- Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671
- Gabel, D. L., Sherwood, R. D., & Enochs, L. (1984). Problem-solving skills of high school chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210212
- Gultepe, N. (2016). Reflections on high school students' graphing skills and their conceptual understanding of drawing chemistry graphs. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 53-81.
- Hill, M., & Sharma, M. D. (2015). Students' representational fluency at university: A cross-sectional measure of how multiple representations are used by physics students using the representational fluency survey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1633-1655.
- Hipkins, R. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
- Hong, M. (1995). Influence of characteristics of problems and problem solvers on chemistry problem solving. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
- Hong, M., & Park, Y. (1994). Analysis of characteristics of problem solving process in gas phase problems of college students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 14(2), 143-158.
- Hsu, L., Brewe, E., Foster, T. M., & Harper, K. A. (2004). Resource letter RPS-1: Research in problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 72(9), 1147-1156. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1763175
- Ibrahim, B., & Rebello, N. S. (2012). Representational task formats and problem solving strategies in kinematics and work. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010126
- Jeon, K. (1999). Problem solving strategy and paired think aloud problem solving: Instructional effect and small group problem solving process in chemistry class. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
- Kim, T. S., & Kim, B.-K. (2002). The comparison of graphing abilities of pupils in grades 7 to 12 based on TOGS(The test of graphing in science). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 768-778.
- Kim, T. S., Ko, S. K., & Kim, B. K. (2005). Relationships of graphing ability to science-process skills and academic achievement of high school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(5), 624-633.
- Kim, Y., Choi, G., & Noh, T. (2009). High school students' errors in constructing and interpreting science graph. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(8), 978-989.
- Kim, Y., Moon, S., Kang, H., & Noh, T. (2009). Analysis of the types of errors in science graph construction processes of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(2), 168-178.
- Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
- Kwon, J., & Lee, S. (1988). A Comparative analysis of expert's and novice's thinking processes in solving physics problems. A Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 8(1), 43-55.
- Lapp, D. A., & Cyrus, V. F. (2000). Using data-collection devices to enhance students' understanding. Mathematics Teacher, 93(6), 504-510. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.93.6.0504
- Larkin, J. H. (1978). Problem solving in physics: Structure, process, and learning. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural/process models of complex human behavior. (pp. 445-458). The Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
- Larkin, J. H. (1981). Cognition of learning physics. American Journal of Physics, 49(6), 534-541. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12667
- Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4(4), 317-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(80)80008-5
- Lee, H., Ryu, H., & Chang, K. (2009). Investigation to teach graphical representations and their interpretations of functions to fifth graders. The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 131-145.
- Lemke, J. (1998). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00009-1
- Lim, H.-M., Kim, Y.-H., & Kim, Y.-S. (2010). Female high school students' ability to construct graphs in biology. The Korean Society of Biology Education, 38(2), 342-352.
- Madden, S. P., Jones, L. L., & Rahm, J. (2011). The role of multiple representations in the understanding of ideal gas problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(3), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90035H
- McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science(TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230702
- Meredith, D. C., & Marrongelle, K. A. (2008). How students use mathematical resources in an electrostatics context. American Journal of Physics, 76(6), 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2839558
- Noh, T., Jeon K., Han, I., & Kim, C. (1996). Comparison of chemistry problem solving behaviors in the aspects of cognitive developmental level of student and context of problem. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(4), 389-400.
- Park, H.-K., & Kwon, J.-S. (1994). A study on students' thinking processes in solving physics problems. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 14(1), 85-102.
- Park, J. (2018). Features of elementary students' intuitive thinking during the problem solving activities on thermal phenomena: Focusing on the processes of emergence and elaboration. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
- Park, Y. (2002). Teaching and learning of physics problem solving[물리문제해결 학습과 지도]. In I. Kim, J. Park, K. Choi, J. Song & Y. Park (Eds.), General physics education II[물리교육학 총론 II]. (pp. 69-136). Seoul: Bookshill.
- Park, Y., & Cho, Y.-K. (2005). Analysis of physics problem solving processes of high school students to qualitative and quantitative problems. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(4), 526-532.
- Ploetzner, R., Lippitsch, S., Galmbacher, M., Heuer, D., & Scherrer, S. (2009). Students' difficulties in learning from dynamic visualisations and how they may be overcome. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.006
- Potgieter, M., Harding, A., & Engelbrecht, J. (2008). Transfer of algebraic and graphical thinking between mathematics and chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20208
- Rau, M. A. (2015). Enhancing undergraduate chemistry learning by helping students make connections among multiple graphical representations. The Royal Society of Chemistry, 16(3), 654-669.
- Secken, N., & Yoruk, N. Z. (2012). An analysis of relations between concerns about the use of graphs in chemistry classes and multiple intelligences in terms of different variables. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1(2), 142-156.
- Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E. F. (2004). Understanding students' poor performance on mathematical problem solving in physics. In Proceedings of the 2004 Physics Education Research Conference, University of Maryland, MD, USA.
- Vermaat, H., Terlouw, C., Dijkstra, S., & Vermaat, J. H. (2003). Multiple representations in web-based learning of chemistry concepts. In Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Yang, S. J., & Jang, M. D. (2012). Analysis of children's constructing and interpreting of a line graph in science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2012.31.3.321
- Zoller, U., Dori, Y., & Lubezky, A. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: Performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049060