DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study of Ice Gouge Simulation Considering Ice Keel-Seabed Interactions

빙-해저지반 상호작용을 고려한 빙쇄굴 시뮬레이션 비교연구

  • Shin, Mun-Beom (Department of Ocean Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Park, Dong-Su (Department of Convergence Study on the Ocean Science and Technology, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Seo, Young-kyo (Department of Ocean Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 신문범 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과) ;
  • 박동수 (한국해양대학교 해양과학기술융합학과) ;
  • 서영교 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과)
  • Received : 2019.04.04
  • Accepted : 2019.11.11
  • Published : 2019.12.30

Abstract

The ice keel gouge and seabed interaction is one of the major considerations in the design of an Arctic pipeline system. Ice keel and seabed interaction engineering models based on experimental data, which give an explicit equation for estimating the ice gouging depth, have been suggested. The suggested equations usually overestimate the ice keel gouging depth. In addition, various types of numerical analyses have been carried out to verify the suggested engineering model equations in comparison to the experimental data. However, most of numerical analysis results were also overestimated compared with the laboratory experimental data. In this study, a numerical analysis considering the contact condition and geostatic stress was carried out to predict the ice keel gouging depth and compared with the previous studies. Considering the previously mentioned conditions, more accurate results were produced compared with the laboratory experiment results and the error rate was reduced compared to previous numerical analysis studies.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS, 2018. ABAQUS User's Manual. ABAQUS 2018, Rhode Island, Dssault Systems.
  2. Abdalla, B., Pike, K., Eltaher, A., Jukes, P., Duron, B., 2009. Development and Validation of a Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian Finite Element Ice Scour Model. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 5: Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology; CFD and VIV, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Honolulu USA, OMAE 2009-79553, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2009-79553
  3. Barker, A., Timco, G., 2003. The Friction Coefficient of a Large Ice Block on a Sand/Gravel Beach. In 12th Workshop on the Hydraulics of Ice Cover Rivers, CGU HS Comm. on River Ice Processes and the Environment, Edmonton Alberta Canada.
  4. Babaei, M.H., Sudom, D., 2014. Ice-Seabed Gouging Database: Review & Analysis of Available Numerical Models. Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), Houston TX, OTC-24603-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/24603-MS
  5. Banneyake, R., Hossain, K., Eltaher, A., Nguyen, T., Jukes, P., 2011. Ice-Soil-Pipeline Interactions Using Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) Ice Gouge Simulations-Extracts from Ice Pipe JIP. Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), Houston TX, OTC-22047-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/22047-MS
  6. Choi, K.S., Lee, J.H., 2002. A Comparative Study of Ice Scour-Seabed Interaction Models. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 16(1), 27-35.
  7. Grigoriev, I.S., Meilikhov, E.Z., 1997. Handbook of Physical Quantities. CRC Press.
  8. Konuk, I., Yu, S., Garcia, R., 2005. An ALE FEM Model of Ice Scour. Proceedings of the 11th Inertnational Conference of the International Association of Computer Models and Advance in Geomechnaics, Turin Italy.
  9. NAVFAC, 1982. Foundations and Earth Structures. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Washington D.C. USA.
  10. Arnau, S., Ivanovic, A., 2019. Rate Effects During Ice Scour in Sand. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 158, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.08.019
  11. Truskov, P.A., Surkov, G.A., 1991. Scour Depth Distribution on the Northern Sakhalin Offshor. Proceedings of the 1st International Socirty of Offshore and Polar Engineers Conference, Edinburgh UK, ISOPE-I-91-128.
  12. Woodworth-Lynas, C., Nixon, D., Phillips, R., Palmer, A., 1996. Subgouge Deformations and the Security of Arctic Marine Pipeline. Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), Houston TX, OTC-8222-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/8222-MS