DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a Computation Code for the Verification of the Vulnerability Criteria for Surf-riding and Broaching Mode of IMO Second-Generation Intact Stability Criteria

IMO 2세대 선박 복원성 기준에 따른 서프라이딩/ 브로칭 취약성 기준 검증을 위한 계산 코드 개발

  • Shin, Dong Min (Kunsan National University, Shipbuilding and Ocean Equipment Industry empowerment Center) ;
  • Oh, Kyoung-gun (Kunsan National University, Shipbuilding and Ocean Equipment Industry empowerment Center) ;
  • Moon, Byung Young (Kunsan National University, Department of Shipbuilding and Ocean Engineering)
  • 신동민 (군산대학교 조선해양기자재 역량강화센터) ;
  • 오경근 (군산대학교 조선해양기자재 역량강화센터) ;
  • 문병영 (군산대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.20
  • Accepted : 2019.12.19
  • Published : 2019.12.30

Abstract

Recently, the Sub-Committee on SDC (Ship Design and Construction) of IMO have discussed actively the technical issues associated with the second-generation intact stability criteria of ships. Generally, second generation intact stability criteria refer to vulnerability five modes ship stability which occurs when the ship navigating in rough seas. As waves passes the ship, dynamic roll motion phenomenon will affect ship stability that may lead to capsizing. Multi-tiered approach for second generation of intact stability criteria of IMO instruments covers apply for all ships. Each ship is checked for vulnerability to pure loss of stability, parametric roll, and broaching/surf-riding phenomena using L1(level 1) vulnerability criteria. If a possible vulnerability is detected, then the L2(level 2) criteria is used, followed by direct stability assessment, if necessary. In this study, we propose a new method to verify the criteria of the surf-riding/broaching mode of small ships. In case, L1 vulnerability criteria is not satisfied based on the relatively simple calculation using the Froude number, we presented the calculation code for the L2 criteria considering the hydrodynamics in waves to perform the more complicated calculation. Then the vulnerability criteria were reviewed based on the data for a given ship. The value of C, which is the probability of the vulnerability criteria for surf-riding/broaching, was calculated. The criteria value C is considered in new approach method using the Froude-Krylov force and the diffraction force. The result shows lower values when considering both the Froude-rylov force and the diffraction force than with only the Froude-Krylov force was considered. This difference means that when dynamic roll motion of ship, more exact wave force needs considered for second generation intact stability criteria This result will contribute to basic ship design process according to the IMO Second-Generation Intact Stability Criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. Artyszuk, J., 2003. Wave Fraction and Thrust Deduction During Ship Astern Manoeuvres. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 68. https://doi.org/10.2495/MT030121
  2. Begovic, E., Bertorello, C., Boccadamo, G., Rinauro, B., 2018. Application of Surf-riding and Broaching Criteria for the Systematic Series D Models. Ocean Engineering, 170, 246-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.062
  3. Belenky, V., Bassler, C.C., Spyrou, K.J., 2011. Development of Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. Hydromechanics Department Report, Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division-50-TR-2011/065.
  4. IMO, 2015a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 2/WP.4.
  5. IMO, 2015b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 3/6/6.
  6. IMO, 2015c. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 3/INF.10.
  7. IMO, 2016a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 3/WP.5.
  8. IMO, 2016b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 4/5/4.
  9. IMO, 2017a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 4/WP.4 Annex 1.
  10. IMO, 2017b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 5/INF 4 Add.1.
  11. IMO, 2019. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 6/WP.6.
  12. Ito, Y., Umeda, N., Kubo, H., 2014. Hydrodynamic Aspects on Vulnerability Criteria for Surf-riding of Ships. Journal Teknologi, 66(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.2498
  13. Kracht, A.M., Jacobsen, A., 1992. D-Series Systematic Experiments with Models of Fast Twin-screw Displacement Ship. SNAME Transactions, 100, 199-222.
  14. Maki, A., Umeda, N., Renilson, M., Ueta, T., 2010. Analytical Formulae for Predicting the Surf-riding Threshold for a Ship in Following Seas. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 15(3), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-010-0085-y
  15. Spyrou, K.J., 2001. The Nonlinear Dynamics of Ships in Broaching. Marie Curie Fellowships Annals, 1.