The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of zirconia to resin: The effects of specimen preparation and loading procedure

  • Chen, Bingzhuo (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Yang, Lu (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Lu, Zhicen (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Meng, Hongliang (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Wu, Xinyi (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Chen, Chen (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Xie, Haifeng (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University)
  • Received : 2019.03.02
  • Accepted : 2019.12.11
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. Shear bond strength (SBS) test is the most commonly used method for evaluating resin bond strength of zirconia, but SBS results vary among different studies even when evaluating the same bonding strategy. The purpose of this study was to promote standardization of the SBS test in evaluating zirconia ceramic bonding and to investigate factors that may affect the SBS value of a zirconia/resin cement/composite resin bonding specimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The zirconia/resin cement/composite resin bonding specimens were used to simulate loading with a shear force by the three-dimensional finite element (3D FE) modeling, in which stress distribution under uniform/non-uniform load, and different resin cement thickness and different elastic modulus of resin composite were analyzed. In vitro SBS test was also performed to validate the results of 3D FE analysis. RESULTS. The loading flat width was an important affecting factor. 3D FE analysis also showed that differences in resin cement layer thickness and resin composite would lead to the variations of stress accumulation area. The SBS test result showed that the load for preparing a SBS specimen is negatively correlated with the resin cement thickness and positively correlated with SBS values. CONCLUSION. When preparing a SBS specimen for evaluating bond performance, the load flat width, the load applied during cementation, and the different composite resins used affect the SBS results and therefore should be standardized.

Keywords

References

  1. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  2. Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015;17:7-26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33525
  3. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011;27:71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022
  4. Wong ACH, Tian T, Tsoi JKH, Burrow MF, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of adhesion tests on resin-glass ceramic bonding. Dent Mater 2017;33:1045-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.013
  5. Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102:395-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33013
  6. Sultan H, Kelly JR, Kazemi RB. Investigating failure behavior and origins under supposed "shear bond" loading. Dent Mater 2015;31:807-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.007
  7. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e38-49.
  8. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG, Belser UC, Meyer JM. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994;10:172-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90028-0
  9. Urapepon S. Effect of cement film thickness on shear bond strengths of two resin cements. J Dent 2014;34:122-8.
  10. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989;17:61-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0
  11. ISO/TR 11405. Dental materials - Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 1994. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/19347.html
  12. ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2003. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/31486.html
  13. ISO 29022. Dentistry - Adhesion - Notched-edge shear bond strength test. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2013. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/45285.html
  14. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69:36-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690010501
  15. Chiba A, Hatayama T, Kainose K, Nakajima M, Pashley DH, Wakabayashi N, Tagami J. The influence of elastic moduli of core materials on shear stress distributions at the adhesive interface in resin built-up teeth. Dent Mater J 2017;36:95-102. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-160
  16. Kanat B, Comlekoglu ME, Comlekoglu MD, Culha O, Ozcan M, Gungor MA. Microshear bond strength and finite element analysis of resin composite adhesion to press-on-metal ceramic for repair actions after various conditioning methods. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:63-70.
  17. Ayar M, Yesilyurt C, Yildirim T. Effect of different composite placement molds on resin-enamel/dentin shear bond strength. J Res Med Dent Sci 2016;4:141-5. https://doi.org/10.5455/jrmds.20164213
  18. Chen Y, Lu Z, Qian M, Zhang H, Chen C, Xie H, Tay FR. Chemical affinity of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate to dental zirconia: Effects of molecular structure and solvents. Dent Mater 2017;33:e415-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.013
  19. Attia A. Bond strength of three luting agents to zirconia ceramic - influence of surface treatment and thermocycling. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:388-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011005000015
  20. Gressler May L, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Influence of the resin cement thickness on the fatigue failure loads of CAD/CAM feldspathic crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:895-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.019
  21. Jin XZ, Homaei E, Matinlinna JP, Tsoi JKH. A new concept and finite-element study on dental bond strength tests. Dent Mater 2016;32:e238-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.005
  22. Rezende CE, Borges AF, Gonzaga CC, Duan Y, Rubo JH, Griggs JA. Effect of cement space on stress distribution in Y-TZP based crowns. Dent Mater 2017;33:144-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.006
  23. Ha SR, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Yoo SH, Kim HK. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement thickness. Ceram Int 2016;42:14928-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.133
  24. Liu HL, Lin CL, Sun MT, Chang YH. Numerical investigation of macro- and micro-mechanics of a ceramic veneer bonded with various cement thicknesses using the typical and submodeling finite element approaches. J Dent 2009;37:141-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.009
  25. Turp V, Sen D, Tuncelli B, Ozcan M. Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etchand-rinse technique. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:226-33. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.226
  26. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.016
  27. de Souza G, Hennig D, Aggarwal A, Tam LE. The use of MDP-based materials for bonding to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:895-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.016
  28. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.040
  29. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:508-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.013
  30. Chai H, Kaizer M, Chughtai A, Tong H, Tanaka C, Zhang Y. On the interfacial fracture resistance of resin-bonded zirconia and glass-infiltrated graded zirconia. Dent Mater 2015;31:1304-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.161
  31. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Kahn H, Blatz MB, Sadan A. Influence of contamination and cleaning on bond strength to modified zirconia. Dent Mater 2009;25:1541-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.007
  32. Vechiato-Filho AJ, Matos AO, Landers R, Goiato MC, Rangel EC, De Souza GM, Barao VAR, Dos Santos DM. Surface analysis and shear bond strength of zirconia on resin cements after non-thermal plasma treatment and/or primer application for metallic alloys. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2017;72:284-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.033
  33. Wilson PR. Crown behaviour during cementation. J Dent 1992;20:156-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90128-Y
  34. Wassell RW, Barker D, Steele JG. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: try-in and cementation of crowns. Br Dent J 2002;193:17-20, 23-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801473
  35. Kim SH, Park CJ, Cho LR, Huh YH. Evaluation of the ceramic liner bonding effect between zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:282-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.022

Cited by

  1. Shear force comparative evaluation for surface treated and non- treated 3D interim printed materials with different types of glass-ionomer cements vol.12, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57003