Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Internal Fitness of Prostheses Fabricated with Non-Contact Extra-Oral Scanner and Intra-Oral Video Scanner

비접촉식 구강외 스캐너와 비디오방식 구강내 스캐너를 이용하여 제작된 보철물의 내면정확도 비교

  • Park, Jin-Young (Institute for Health Science, College of Public Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Jeong, Il-Do (Institute for Health Science, College of Public Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Gwang-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Kim, Won-Soo (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Dae-jeon Health Science of College)
  • 박진영 (고려대학교 보건과학대학 보건과학연구소) ;
  • 김지환 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 정일도 (고려대학교 보건과학대학 보건과학연구소) ;
  • 이광영 (원광보건대학교 치기공과) ;
  • 김원수 (대전보건대학교 치기공과)
  • Received : 2019.10.14
  • Accepted : 2019.12.18
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal fitness of prostheses fabricated with non-contact extra-oral scanner and those fabricated with intra-oral video scanner, with a comparative accuracy analyses of their precision and trueness. Methods: A polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) model was fabricated by replicating a master model. The prostheses in the first group were fabricated based on the PMMA model with an intra-oral video scanner (IVS group). Following the fabrication of work models with Type IV Stone that were based on the PMMA model, the prostheses in the second group were fabricated with a non-contact extra-oral scanner (ENB group). The precision and trueness of the prostheses were calculated from comparisons of the three-dimensional images of the internal surfaces of the prostheses and those of the master model. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine the statistical significance, with the level of type 1 error set at 0.05. Results: Trueness (P < 0.009) and precision (P < 0.001) did not differ significantly between the ENB and IVS groups. The IVS group exhibited lower trueness values and larger precision values than the ENB group. Conclusion: Although no significant differences were found in the internal fitness of the prostheses that were fabricated by the two different scanners, the intraoral video scanner-fabricated prostheses had better trueness, whereas the non-contact extra-oral scanner-fabricated prostheses had better precision.

Keywords

References

  1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: anoverview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dental J, 204(9), 505-511, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  2. Brosky ME, Pesun IJ, Lowder PD, DeLong R, Hodges JS. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent, 87(2), 204-209, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121240
  3. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc, 139(6), 761-763, 2008. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258
  4. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing:deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc, 140(10), 1301-1304, 2009. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  5. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of completearch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent, 109(2), 121-128, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
  6. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int (Berlin, Germany: 1985), 46(1), 9-17, 2015.
  7. e Silva JSA, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LCC, et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig, 18(2), 515-523, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
  8. ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva, Switzerland. International Organization for Standardization. 1994.
  9. Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent, 114(4), 549-553, 2015a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
  10. Jeon JH, Jung ID, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner. Dent Mater J, 34(5), 686-691, 2015b. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-347
  11. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 115(6), 755-759, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007
  12. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a threedimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod, 44(2), 69-76, 2014a. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69
  13. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim WC, Kim HY. Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD/CAM system. Quintessence Int, 46(5). 401-407, 2014b.
  14. Masri R, Driscoll C. Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  15. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 112(6), 1461-1471, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
  16. Park JY, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont, 7(4), 294-302, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.294
  17. Mously HA, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. J Prosthet Dent, 112(2), 249-256, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.017
  18. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent, 80(4), 394-404, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2