DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Comparison of the Optimizers in a Faster R-CNN Model for Object Detection of Metaphase Chromosomes

중기 염색체 객체 검출을 위한 Faster R-CNN 모델의 최적화기 성능 비교

  • Received : 2019.07.29
  • Accepted : 2019.09.04
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

In this paper, we compares the performance of the gredient descent optimizers of the Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN) model for the chromosome object detection in digital images composed of human metaphase chromosomes. In faster R-CNN, the gradient descent optimizer is used to minimize the objective function of the region proposal network (RPN) module and the classification score and bounding box regression blocks. The gradient descent optimizer. Through performance comparisons among these four gradient descent optimizers in our experiments, we found that the Adamax optimizer could achieve the mean average precision (mAP) of about 52% when considering faster R-CNN with a base network, VGG16. In case of faster R-CNN with a base network, ResNet50, the Adadelta optimizer could achieve the mAP of about 58%.

본 논문은 사람의 중기 염색체로 이루어진 디지털 이미지에서 Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network(R-CNN) 모델로 염색체 객체를 검출할 때 필요한 경사 하강 최적화기의 성능을 비교한다. Faster R-CNN의 경사 하강 최적화기는 Region Proposal Network(RPN) 모듈과 분류 점수 및 바운딩 박스 예측 블록의 목적 함수를 최소화하기 위해 사용된다. 실험에서는 이러한 네 가지 경사 하강 최적화기의 성능을 비교하였으며 VGG16이 기본 네트워크인 Faster R-CNN 모델은 Adamax 최적화기가 약 52%의 Mean Average Precision(mAP)를 달성하였고 ResNet50이 기본 네트워크인 Faster R-CNN 모델은 Adadelta 최적화기가 약 58%의 mAP를 달성하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Funding for this paper was provided by Namseoul University.

References

  1. Y. Ohnuki, "Structure of chromosomes," Chromosoma, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402-428, Dec. 1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327721
  2. F. Gilbert, "Chromosomes, genes, and cancer: A classification of chromosome abnormalities in cancer," Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1107-1114, 1983.
  3. B. Lerner, "Toward a completely automatic neural-network-based human chromosome analysis," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B(Cybernetics), vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 544-552, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.704293
  4. L. B. W. Yan, "Algorithms for chromosome classific- ation," Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 400-403, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2013.510B081
  5. A. Carothers, and J. Piper, "Computer-aided classification of human chromosomes: a review," Statistics and Computing, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 161-171, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142568
  6. G. Agam, and I. Dinstein, "Geometric separation of partially overlapping nonrigid objects applied to automatic chromosome classification," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1212-1222, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.632981
  7. P. Nithya, and M. Nirmala, "Automatic segmentation of overlapped images," International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 618-623, 2012.
  8. C. Markou, C, Maramis, A. Delopoulos, C. Daiou, and A. Lambropoulos, "Automatic chromosome classification using support vector Machines," in Pattern Recognition: Methods and Applications, Hong Kong, iConceptPress, pp. 1-24, 2012.
  9. Tanvi, and R. Dhir, "An efficient segmentation method for overlapping chromosome images," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 29-32, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5120/16560-4861
  10. M. Sharma, O. Saha, A. Sriraman, R. Hebbalaguppe, L. Vig, and S. Karande, "Crowdsourcing for chromosome segmentation and deep classification," in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Honolulu, pp. 786-793, 2017.
  11. R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation," in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 580-587, 2014.
  12. R. Girshick, "Fast R-CNN," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, pp. 1440-1448, 2015.
  13. S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, "Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1137-1149, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031
  14. R. Reiazien, R. Paydar, A. A. Ardakani, and M. tedadialiabadi, "Mammography lesion detection using Faster R-CNN detector," in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Natural Language Processing, Dubai, pp. 111-115, 2018.
  15. L. Perez, and J. Wang, "The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning," Computing Research Repository (CoRR), vol. abs/1805.09501, 2017.
  16. K. Simonyan, and A. Zisserman, "Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition," in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, arXiv:1409.1556v6, 2015.
  17. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, "Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition," in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Nevada. pp. 770-778, 2016.
  18. Q. V. Le, J. Ngiam, A. Coates, A. Lahiri, B. Prochnow, and A. Y. Ng, "On optimization methods for deep learning," in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, Washington, pp. 265-272, 2011.
  19. M. D. Zeiler, "Adadelta: An adaptive learning rate method," Computing Research Repository (CoRR), vol. abs/1212.5701, 2012.
  20. D. P. Kingma, and J. Ba, "Adam: A method for stochastic optimization," in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, pp. arXiv:1412.6980v9, 2015.
  21. S. Ruder, "An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms," Computing Research Repository (CoRR), pp. abs/1609.04747, 2016.