참고문헌
- Arimoto, T., Kobayashi, N., & Akamatsu, M. (2012). Science and technology policy and synthesiology - Bridging science and values. Synthesiology - English edition, 5(2), 128-133. https://doi.org/10.5571/syntheng.5.128
- Arimoto, T., Sato, Y., Matsuo, K., & Yoshikawa, H. (2016). Kagakuteki jogen. 21seki no kagakugijutsu to seisakukeisei [Scientific Advice. Science, Technology, and Policy Making in the Twenty-First Century]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.
- Broadbent, J. (1998). Environmental Politics in Japan. Networks of Power and Protest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Broadbent, J., Yun, S.-J., Ku, D., Ikeda, Kazuhiro, Satoh, K., Pellissery, S., . . . Jin, J. (2013). Asian Societies and Climate Change: The Variable Diffusion of Global Norms. Globality Studies Journal Global History, Society, Civilization, 32.
- Brueckner, M., & Horwitz, P. (2005). The use of science in environmental policy: a case study of the Regional Forest Agreement process in Western Australia. Sustainablity: Science, Practice, & Policy, 1(2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2005.11907969
- Bulkeley, H. (2000). Discourse Coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2000, 18, 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1068/c9905j
- Cabinet Office of Japan. (2016). 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan. Tokyo: Cabinet Office of Japan.
- Cairney, P., & Kwiatkowski, R. (2017). How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine insights from psychology and policy studies. Palgrave Communications, 3(37).
- Caverni, J.-P., & Peris, J.-L. (1990). The Anchoring-Adjustment Heuristic in an "Information Rich, Real World Setting": Knowledge Assessment by Experts. In J.-P. Caverni, J.-M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez, Advances in Psychology. Cognitive Biases. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
- Chevallier, F., Maksyutov, S., Bousquet, P., Breon, F.-M., Saito, R., Yoshida, Y., & Yokota, T. (2009). On the accuracy of the CO2 surface fluxes to be estimated from the GOSAT observations. Atmospheric Science, 36.
- Cook, K. S., & Yamagishi, T. (1992). Power in exchange networks: a power-dependence formulation. Social Networks, 14, 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(92)90004-Q
- Csardi, G. (2015). R igraph manual pages. Retrieved November 1 2019, from Vertex and edge betweenness centrality: https://igraph.org/r/doc/betweenness.html
- Demizu, T. (2006). The Development of Anti-Pollution Technology. In S. Nakayama, & H. Yoshioka, A Social History of Science and Technology in Contemporary Japan Vol. 4 Transformation Period 1970-1979 (pp. 94-107). Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
- Foljanty-Jost, G. (2005). NGOs in environmental networks in Germany and Japan: The question of power and influence. Social Science Japan Journal, 8(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyi019
- Gampfer, R. (2016). Minilateralism or the UNFCCC? The Political Feasibility of Climate Clubs. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3).
- Golbeck, J. (2015). Chapter 21 - Analyzing Networks. In J. Golbeck, Introduction to Social Media Investigation. A Hands-On Approach (pp. 221-235). Syngress.
- Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourses. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hajer, M. A. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. van den Brink, & T. Metze, Words matter in policy and planning. Discourse theory and method in the social sciences. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.
- Hartwig, M., Kobashi, Y., Okura, S., & Tkach-Kawasaki, L. (2014). Energy policy participation through networks transcending cleavage: an analysis of Japanese and German renewable energy promotion policies. Quality and Quantity.
- Helm, D. (2012). The Kyoto approach has failed. Nature, 491, 663-665. https://doi.org/10.1038/491663a
- Horton, P., & Brown, G. W. (2018). Integrating evidence, politics and society: a methodology for the science-policy interface. Palgrave Communications, 4(42).
- Humphreys, D. (2009). Discourse as ideology: Neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5-6), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.008
- IPCC. (2018). IPCC 30th Anniversary. Retrieved from provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of knowledge about climate change and its potential …
- Kameyama, Y. (2017). Climate Change Policy in Japan. From the 1980s to 2015. New York: Routledge.
- Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, London : Cornell University Press.
- Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. (2013). The Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. Cambrdige, London: The MIT Press.
- Litfin, K. T. (1994). Ozone Discourses. Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
- Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2002, February 21). Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00247
- METI. (2016). Dai 2-bu energuii doukou dai-i-shou: Kokunai enerugii dai-i-setsu enerugii juyou no gaiyou. Retrieved from https://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/about/whitepaper/2017html/2-1-1.html#d211-4-1
- Montpetit, E. (2003). Misplaced Distrust. Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States, and Canada. Vancoucer, Toronto: UBCPress.
- Morgan, J. [. (2017, November 9). Closeness Centrality & Betweenness Centrality: A Social Network Lab in R for Beginners [YouTube]. Retrieved September 17 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aqvVbTyEmc
- Nature. (2011, December 15). Critical mass. Nature, 480, 291.
- NEDO. (2012, June 19). BOCM Feasibility Studies FY2011. Retrieved from https://www.nedo.go.jp/english/other_20120620.html
- Nienierza, A. (2014). Die grosste anzunehmende Umbewertung? Eine Frame-Analyse der deutschen Presseberichterstattung uber Kernenergie nach den Reaktorunfallen von Tschernobyl (1986) und Fukushima (2011). In J. Wolling, & D. Arlt, Fukushima und die Folgen. Medienberichterstattung, Offentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen (pp. 31-54). Ilmenau: Universitatsverlag Ilmenau.
- NISTEP. (2019). Analytical Report for NISTEP Expert Survey on Japanese S&T and Innovation System 2018 (NISTEP TEITEN survey 2018). Tokyo: National Institute for Science and Technology Library (NISTEP).
- OECD. (2015). Scientific Advice for Policy Making. The role and Responsibility of Expert Bodies and Individual Scientists. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 21.
- Okura, S., Tkach-Kawasaki, L., Kobashi, Y., Hartwig, M., & Tsujinaka, Y. (2016). Analysis of the Policy Network for the "Feed-in Tariff Law" in Japan: Evidence from the GEPON Survey. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 15(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2016.15.1.041
- Omoto, A. (2013). The accident at TEPCO's Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: What went wrong and what lessons are universal? Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 731, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.04.017
- Pielke, Jr. , R. A. (2007). Honest Broker. Making Sense of Science in POlicy and Politics. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
- Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning. And Advocacy Coaltion Approach. Colorado: Westview Press, Inc. .
- Sato, Y., & Arimoto, T. (2016). Five years after Fukushima: scientific advie in Japan. Palgrave Communication, 2(16025).
- Satoh, K. (2014). Nihon no kikou hendou seisaki netto waaku no kihonkousou [The Japanese Climate Change Policy Network: The Relationship between a Triple-Pole structured Organizational Support Network and Policy Output. Environmental Sociology, 20, 100-116.
- Schreurs, M. A. (2002). Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Science Council of Japan. (2013). Seimei 'Kagakusha no kodokihan - Kaitei-ban'. Tokyo: Science Council of Japan.
- Suzuki, Z. (2006). Pollution and Environmental Protection. In S. Nakayama, & H. Yoshioka, A Social History of Science and Technology in Contemporary Japan Vol. 4 Transformation Period 1970-1979 (pp. 81-93). Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
- Takao, Y. (2016). Japan's Environmental Politics and Governance. From trading nation to EcoNation. London and New York: Routledge.
- Thatcher, A., Vasconcelos, A. C., & Ellis, D. (2015). An investigation into the impact of information behaviour on information failure: The Daiichi nuclear power disaster. International Journal of Information Management , 35, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.002
- Tobin, P., Schmidt, N. M., Tosun, J., & Burns, C. (2018). Mapping states' Paris climate pledges: Analysing targets and groups at COP 21. Global Environmental Change, 48, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.002
- Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton, New Jersey, New York: Princeton University Press.
- UNDESA. (2015). Global Sustainable Development Report. Advance Unedited Version. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- Van Deemen, A. (1997). Coalition Formation and Social Choice. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Wuppertal Institut, & Institute of Energy Economics, J. (2018). Intensifying German-Japanese Cooperation in Energy Research, and Policy Recommendations. Wuppertal/Tokyo: GJETC Report 2018.
- Young, O. R. (1999). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Young, O. R., & Osherenko, G. (1993). Polar Politics. Creating International Environmental Regimes. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.