Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (대한심미치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (대한심미치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consideration of computer-guided implant surgery

임플란트 가이드 수술시 고려사항

  • Received : 2019.04.20
  • Accepted : 2019.06.01
  • Published : 2019.06.12
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Nowadays, Cone-Beam CT is widely supplied in dental clinics, the distribution rate in south korea is highly ranked worldwidely. Recently, The number of Cone-Beam CTs reached 10 thousands according to national healthcare system report. Also, dental manufacturers released many kinds of In-house 3D digital printers, the distribution rate of which rises rapidly in dental clinics. Accordingly, using Cone-Beam CT data and Intraloral scan data, the application of implant guide surgery is widespread in a unit of private clinic. Through the previous articles, the latest methods of computer-guided implant surgery are reviewed, and also the considerations for precise and reliable guide surgery are summarized.

우리나라 치과의 CBCT 보급률은 세계적으로 높은 편으로, 최근 1만대 보급을 돌파하고 있는 것으로 파악된다. 또한 최근 각 치과 제조업체마다 DLP방식의 In-House방식의 3D 프린터 보급률 또한 가파르게 상승하고 있다. 이에 맞춰 최근 개원가에서 CBCT와 구강 스캔 정보를 이용한 컴퓨터 가이드 임플란트 수술의 활용도가 증가하고 있는 상황이다. 현재 컴퓨터 가이드를 이용한 임플란트 수술 방법에 대해 문헌상 고찰을 통해 리뷰해보고, 또한 정확성 및 신뢰성이 보장되는 가이드 수술을 위한 고려사항에 대해 정리해보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Becker, K., Schmucker, U., Schwarz, F., & Drescher, D. (2018). Accuracy and eligibility of CBCT to digitize dental plaster casts. Clinical Oral Investigations, 22(4), 1817-1823. doi:10.1007/s00784-017-2277-x
  2. Jain, S., Choudhary, K., Nagi, R., Shukla, S., Kaur, N., & Grover, D. (2019). New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent, 49(3), 179-190. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179
  3. Jamjoom, F. Z., Kim, D.-G., McGlumphy, E. A., Lee, D. J., & Yilmaz, B. (2018). Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 120(3), 367-374. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.019
  4. Jeong, S.-M., Fang, J.-W., Hwang, C.-H., Kang, S.-H., Choi, B.-H., Fang, Y., . . . An, S. (2015). Accuracy assessment of implant placement using a stereolithographic surgical guide made with digital scan. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 53(2), 111-119. Retrieved from http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4047%2Fjk ap.2015.53.2.111 https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.2.111
  5. Kapadia, Y. (2018). Radiopacity of materials used for radiographic guides in implant dentistry.
  6. Kim, J.-E., Park, J.-H., Kim, J.-H., & Shim, J.-S. (2019). Computer-based implant planning involving a prefabricated custom tray with alumina landmark structures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 121(3), 373-377. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.002
  7. Mai, H.-N., Choi, S.-Y., Lee, S.-T., & Lee, D.-H. (2018). Optimizing accuracy in computer-guided implant surgery with a superimposition-anchor microscrew system: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 120(5), 789. e781-789.e785. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.014
  8. Oh, H. J., Wikesjo, U. M., Kang, H. S., Ku, Y., Eom, T. G., & Koo, K. T. (2011). Effect of implant drill characteristics on heat generation in osteotomy sites: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 22(7), 722-726. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02051.x
  9. Oh, K. C., Park, J.-M., Shim, J.-S., Kim, J.-H., Kim, J.-E., & Kim, J.-H. (2019). Assessment of metal sleevefree 3D-printed implant surgical guides. Dental Materials, 35(3), 468-476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.001
  10. Park, C.-W., Kim, J.-h., Seo, Y.-K., Lee, S.-R., Kang, J.-H., Oh, S.-H., . . . Hwang, E.-H. (2017). Volumetric accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent, 47(3), 165-174. Retrieved from http://synapse. koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.5624%2Fisd.2017.47.3.165 https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.3.165
  11. Schneider, D., Marquardt, P., Zwahlen, M., & Jung, R. E. (2009). A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(s4), 73-86. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x
  12. Sener, B. C., Dergin, G., Gursoy, B., Kelesoglu, E., & Slih, I. (2009). Effects of irrigation temperature on heat control in vitro at different drilling depths. Clin Oral Implants Res, 20(3), 294-298. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01643.x
  13. Spin-Neto, R., Matzen, L. H., Schropp, L., Gotfredsen, E., & Wenzel, A. (2017). Detection of patient movement during CBCT examination using video observation compared with an accelerometer-gyroscope tracking system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 46(2), 20160289. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20160289
  14. Suriyan, N., Sarinnaphakorn, L., Deeb, G. R., & Bencharit, S. (2019). Trephination-based, guided surgical implant placement: A clinical study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 121(3), 411-416. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.004
  15. 나지연, 차정열, 한상선, 황재준, 우창우, & 정호걸. (2017). 콘빔시티 촬영 프로토콜에 따른 DICOM 파일의 STL 변환 디지털 모델의 정확도 비교. [Comparative Accuracy of STL Conversion Digital Model of DICOM Files according to CBCT Scanning Protocols]. Journal of Korean Academy of Advanced General Dentistry, 6, 1-7. Retrieved from https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/153720 https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.198585
  16. 박지만, & 심준성. (2018). 컴퓨터-보조 임플란트 수술에 대한 고찰: 네비게이션 수술 시스템 vs. 컴퓨터가이드 임플란트 템플릿 vs. 수술 로봇. [Review of Computer-assisted Implant Surgeries: Navigation Surgery System vs. Computer-guided Implant Template vs. Robot]. Implantology, 22(1), 50-58. doi:10.12972/implantology.20180005