한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제38권5호
  • /
  • Pages.681-691
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

협력적 문제해결(CoProC) 전략을 통한 중학생의 실천적 인성 역량 및 협력적 문제해결력의 함양

Impacts of Collaborative Problem Solving for Character Competency (CoProC) Strategy on the Practical Character Competency and Collaborative Problem Solving Competency in Middle School Science

  • 투고 : 2018.08.16
  • 심사 : 2018.10.19
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 과학교과에 협력적 문제해결(Collaborative Problem solving for Character competency, CoProC) 전략이 중학생의 실천적 인성 역량에 미치는 영향을 알아보고, 이 전략을 적용한 학생들의 반성 글쓰기에서 나타나는 협력적 문제해결력의 변화를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 광역시에 위치한 중학교 1학년 여학생반을 대상으로 하여 2개 학급 49명은 협력적 문제해결(CoProC) 전략을 적용한 집단(CoProC 집단)으로, 2개 학급 46명은 전통적인 강의식 수업 및 실험 수업을 적용한 집단(비교 집단)으로 나누었다. 두 집단에는 한학기 동안 5개 주제의 프로그램을 적용하였다. CoProC 집단은 비교 집단 보다 실천적 인성 역량의 총점에서 통계적으로 유의미하게 높은 결과를 나타냈으며, 하위 항목에서는 협력, 소통, 책임, 긍정적 자기이해에서 통계적으로 유의미하게 높게 나타났다. 협력적 문제해결(CoProC) 전략을 적용한 수업에서 학생들의 실천적 인성 역량의 하위항목별 효과 크기(effect size)를 분석해보면, CoProC 집단은 비교 집단 보다 배려, 협력, 소통, 정직, 책임, 긍정적 자기이해, 자기조절에서 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 중학교 과학수업에서 적용한 협력적 문제해결(CoProC) 전략이 협력적 문제해결력에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 CoProC 집단의 학생들이 수행한 5개 주제의 활동 중 초기와 후기의 수업에서 작성된 반성 글쓰기를 분석하여 협력적 문제 해결력의 사회적 역량에 한정하여 그 변화를 알아보았다. 그 결과 협력적 문제해결력의 총점에서 큰 수준의 효과 크기를 보였다. 하위 항목인 구성원의 탐색과 이해는 작은 수준의 효과 크기를 나타냈으며, 조직 구성 및 유지는 중간 수준의 효과 크기를 나타냈다. 또한 의사소통과 자기 행동 반성은 큰 수준의 효과 크기를 나타냈다. 과학교과 중심의 협력적 문제해결(CoProC) 전략은 과학적 탐구 과정에서 이루어지는 과학적 의사소통을 통한 문제해결의 과정을 통해 학생들의 협력적 문제해결력을 향상시킬 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of Collaborative Problem solving for Character competency (CoProC) strategy on the practical character competency and collaborative problem solving competency in middle school. For this study, 49 seventh grade students (two classes) were selected for use applying the CoProC strategy (CoProC group) while 46 students (two classes) were used for traditional lecture and experimental class (comparative group). In the result, CoProC group showed a statistically significant result in practical character competency than the comparative group. In the sub items of the competency, the CoProC group showed result statistically significant in cooperation, communication, responsibility, and positive self-understanding than the comparative group. Analysis of the effect size of students' practical character competency showed that the CoProC group results showed more effective than the comparative group in terms of care, cooperation, communication, honesty, responsibility, positive self-understanding, and self-regulation. In addition, we investigated the effect of the CoProC strategy on collaborative problem solving competency. As a result, it showed a large effect in the total score of collaborative problem solving competency. Among the sub items of the competency, 'exploration and understanding of members' showed a small size of effect and 'Establishing and maintaining team organization' showed a medium size of effect. 'Communication' and 'self-reflection' showed a large effect. CoProC strategy embedded in Science subject could improve students' collaborative problem solving competency through the process of scientific communication in the scientific inquiry process.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176008
  2. Chi, E. L., & Seong, Y. M., & Lee, S. K. (2015). Effects of collaborative performance assessment on group efficacy and creative leader competency for the secondary school language class. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 18(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2015.18.2.131
  3. Cooper, K. (2000). Effective competency modeling & reporting: a stepby-step guide for improving individual & organizational performance. Amacom Books.
  4. Do, S. L. (2013). The Character Education as a Future Human Resource Development. The Journal of Thinking Development, 9(2), 143-159.
  5. Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., Greiff, S., Griffin, P., Gong, B., Kyllonen, P., Massey, C., O'Neil, H., Pellegrino, J., Rothman, R., Soule, H., & von Davier, A. (2017). Collaborative Problem Solving: Considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
  6. Gim, C. C., Kang, C. Y., So, K. H., Son, M. H., Jin, D. S., & Jeong, S. R. (2012). Study on the curriculum development direction reflecting practical character education. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Policy research, 2012.9.
  7. Huh, S. H. (1998). An analysis of the effectiveness of character education programs in the elementary school. The Journal of Elementary Education, 12(1), 67-86.
  8. Hyun, J., Lee, H. Y., Han, M. Y., Seo, D. H., Ryu, D. Y., & Han, H. S. (2013). A study of plan on activating character education for elementary/secondary students (1): Exploring character education diagnosis and development tasks. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  9. Kang, S. B., Park, E. S., Kim, G. S., Song, S. J., Chung, Y. K., Kim, Y. R., & Ko, M. S. (2008). A foundational study for the vision of education for the human nature for 21st century. Journal of research in education, 30, 1-38.
  10. Kim, D. I., Koh, H. J., Kim, E. H., Lee, H. E., Kim, H. S., Seo, M., Lee, Y. B., Lee, Y. S., Hong, S, D. (2015). Study on five-year comprehensive plan for character education. Policy research and development project. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  11. Kim, D. L., Choi, S. J., Shim, S. Y., Lee, J. J. Ra, Y. A. (2016). The Challenges and Prospects of Future Education Design based on Character Education. Asian journal of education, 17(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2016.03.17.1.25
  12. Kwon, J. I., & Nam. J. H. (2017). Impact of Collaborative Problem-Solving Instruction Model on Character Competence of High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 847-857. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.5.847
  13. Lee, S. H., Kim, J. G., Yoon, C, H., & Hong, J. G. (2017). The effects of subject-kinked character education on character development for elementary school students. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 25(4), 1-21.
  14. Nam. J. H., Kwak, K. H., Jang, K. H., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using science writing heuristic(SWH) in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
  15. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010). Creativity-character education Subject research group workshop resources(elementary school).
  16. Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Ministry of Education, Notice 2015-74.
  17. Ministry of Education (2016). Five year comprehensive plan of character education(2016-2020).
  18. OECD (2013) PISA 2015: Draft Collaborative Problem Solving Framework. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
  19. Rychen, D. S. E., & Salganik, L. H. E. (2001). Defining and selecting key competencies. hogrefe & huber publishers.
  20. Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Hogrefe Publishing.
  21. Song, J. J., & Lee, S. W. (2017). The development of character education program for life science area in elementary practical arts. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 28(2), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.28.2.201706.31
  22. Spencer, L. & Spencer, S. (1993) Competency at Work: Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  23. Sung, E. M., Bae, H. J., & Jin, S. H. (2014). Measurement of youth competency index and international comparative studyI: IEA ICCS 2016-General report. Korea Institute for Youth Development, 1-325.
  24. Tuxworth, E.(1989). Competence-based education and training: Background and origins. In J. W. Bruke (Ed.), Competency-based education and training. London: The Falmer Press.
  25. Yang, J. S., Cho, N, S., Park, S. Y., Jang, G. J., & Eun, J. Y. (2013). A study on the development of character education through subject Education. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation. RRC, 6.

피인용 문헌

  1. 디자인씽킹 기반 어플리케이션 적용 음악수업 활동과 이에 대한 효과성 탐색 vol.20, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.01.233
  2. 디지털 시대에 요구되는 예비 초등교사의 과학 관련 협력적 문제해결역량 분석 vol.39, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.4.494
  3. 인성 중심 교수 모형에 대한 이해와 실천이 예비 중등 과학교사의 인성 교육에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향 분석 vol.65, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2021.65.4.279