DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Axial Behavior of Columns Strengthened with Different Transverse Reinforcements in Jacket Section

확대단면에서의 띠철근 배근 방법에 따른 보강 기둥의 중심 축하중 거동 평가

  • Received : 2018.08.07
  • Accepted : 2018.10.25
  • Published : 2018.11.01

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effective arrangement approach of transverse reinforcement in the jacket section for seismic strengthening of reinforced concrete columns. To simulate the full-scale columns, the section dimensions were determined as $450{\times}450mm$ for non-seismic existing columns and $750{\times}750mm$ for section enlargement strengthening columns. Over-lapped channel-shape bars and prefabricated bar units were proposed for closed-hoops in the jacket section, and conventional cross-ties anchored into existing columns and V-ties were considered for the supplementary ties. Test results showed that the axial capacity of the existing column and section enlargement columns with over-lapped channel-shape hoops was similar to the nominal strength calculated using ACI 318-14 procedure whereas the section enlargement column with prefabricated bar units possessed 1.25 times higher axial capacity than the nominal prediction. Furthermore, the axial ductility ratio of the section enlargement column with prefabricated bar unit was 139% higher than that of the existing column despite the potential size effect on ductility of concrete. Thus, it can be concluded that the developed prefabricated bar unit technique is practically useful for preventing the premature buckling of longitudinal reinforcement and confining core concrete in the section enlargement strengthening columns.

이 연구에서는 실제 단면크기를 갖는 철근 콘크리트 기둥의 내진보강을 위한 단면확대 공법에서 효율적인 띠철근 배근 방법을 평가하였다. 비내진 상세를 갖는 기존 기둥의 단면크기는 $450{\times}450mm$이며, 단면확대 보강기둥의 단면크기는 $750{\times}750mm$이다. 확대 단면에서의 폐쇄형 외부 띠철근 배근을 위해 ㄷ-형 띠철근의 겹칩이음 및 철근 선조립 공법을 제시하였으며, 보조 띠철근으로서 크로스타이 앵커링 시공 및 V-타이를 고려하였다. 실험 결과, 무보강 기둥 및 ㄷ-형 외부 띠철근을 적용한 보강기둥의 압축내력은 ACI 318-14의 공칭내력과 비슷한 수준인 반면 철근 선조립 공법을 적용한 기둥의 압축내력은 ACI 318-14의 공칭내력 대비 1.25배 높았다. 특히 철근 선조립 공법을 적용한 보강 기둥의 압축 연성비는 크기효과에 의한 연성비 저하 가능성에도 불구하고 기존 기둥에 비해 139% 증가하였다. 즉, 제시된 철근 선조립 공법은 단면확대 보강기둥에서 주철근 조기 좌굴방지 및 콘크리트 구속에 효율적인 띠철근 상세로 평가될 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2014), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  2. Adilson, R. T, Joao, B. H., and Amir, M. (2007), Preloaded RC Columns Strengthened with High-Strength Concrete jackets under Uniaxial Compression, Materials and Structures, 41, 1251-1262.
  3. Ali, K. S., and Mario, M. A. (2012), A Stress-Strain Model for Uniaxial and Confined Concrete under Compression, Engineering Structures, 41, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.027
  4. Branco, F., Julio, E. S., and Silva, V. D. (2008), Reinforced Concrete Jacketing-Interface Influence on Cyclic Loading Response, ACI Structure Journal, 105(4), 471-477.
  5. Georgia, E. T., and Iman, H. (2018), Compressive Behaviour of Concrete Columns Confined with Steel-Reinforced Grout Jackets, Composites Part B: Engineering, 138, 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.041
  6. Kim, Y. I., Jo, B. H., and Hong, S. H.(2008), An Experiment on Anchorage and Usefulness of Expanded Steel-Plate Nets of RC Beams Strengthened by Increasing Section. Journal of the Korea Architectural Institute, 24(8), 65-74 (in Korean, with English abstract).
  7. Lee, K. I., Yoon, H. S., and Yang, K. H.(2018), Compressive and Adhesive Strengths of Mortars using Polymer and Ultra-Rapid-Hardening Cement, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, under review (in Korean, with English abstract).
  8. Jin, L., Du, M., Li, D., Du, X., and Xu, H. (2017), Effects of Cross Section Size and Lateral Rebar on the Behavior of Short Squared RC Columns under Axial Compression, Engineering Structures, 142, 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.002
  9. Mini, S., and Jebin, M. (2018), Rehabilitation of RC Columns using Ferrocement Jacketing, Construction and Building materials, 181, 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.206
  10. Ozcebe, G., and Saatcioglu, M. (1987), Confinement of Concrete Columns for Seismic Loading, ACI Structural Journal, 84(4), 308-315.
  11. Penelis, G. G., and Kappos, A. J. (1997), Earthquake resistant concrete structures, CRC Press, Florida.
  12. Saatcioglu, M., and Razvi, S. R. (1992), Strength and Ductility of Confined Concrete, Structural Engineering, ASCE, 118(6), 1590-1607. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1590)
  13. Troung, G. T., Kim, J. C., and Choi, K. K. (2017), Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns Retrofitted by Various Methods, Engineering Structures, 134, 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.046
  14. Yang, K. H., and Kim, W. W. (2016), Axial Compression Performance of Reinforced Concrete Short Columns with Supplementary V-Shaped Ties, ACI Structural Journal, 113(6), 1347-1356. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689159
  15. Yoo, Y. J., Lee, K. H., Kim, H. C., Lee, Y. H., and Hong, W. K. (2008), Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of Concrete Column Retrofitted by Carbon FRP Sheet, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 12(3), 199-126 (in Korean, with English abstract).