The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of changes in the maxillary alveolar bone after incisor intrusion

  • Atik, Ezgi (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Gorucu-Coskuner, Hande (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Akarsu-Guven, Bengisu (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Taner, Tulin (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University)
  • Received : 2018.01.29
  • Accepted : 2018.04.21
  • Published : 2018.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to investigate the changes in alveolar bone after maxillary incisor intrusion and to determine the related factors in deep-bite patients. Methods: Fifty maxillary central incisors of 25 patients were evaluated retrospectively. The maxillary incisors in Group I (12 patients; mean age, $16.51{\pm}1.32years$) were intruded with a base-arch, while those in Group II (13 patients; mean age, $17.47{\pm}2.71years$) were intruded with miniscrews. Changes in the alveolar envelope were assessed using pre-intrusion and post-intrusion cone-beam computed tomography images. Labial, palatal, and total bone thicknesses were evaluated at the crestal (3 mm), midroot (6 mm), and apical (9 mm) levels. Buccal and palatal alveolar crestal height, buccal bone height, and the prevalence of dehiscence were evaluated. Two-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the changes. Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis was performed to assess the relationship between dental and alveolar bone measurement changes. Results: Upper incisor inclination and intrusion changes were significantly greater in Group II than in Group I. With treatment, the alveolar bone thickness at the labial bone thickness (LBT, 3 and 6 mm) decreased significantly in Group II (p < 0.001) as compared to Group I. The LBT change at 3 mm was strongly and positively correlated with the amount of upper incisor intrusion (r = 0.539; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Change in the labial inclination and the amount of intrusion should be considered during upper incisor intrusion, as these factors increase the risk of alveolar bone loss.

Keywords

References

  1. Nauert K, Berg R. Evaluation of labio-lingual bony support of lower incisors in orthodontically untreated adults with the help of computed tomography. J Orofac Orthop 1999;60:321-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301245
  2. Verna C, Zaffe D, Siciliani G. Histomorphometric study of bone reactions during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Bone 1999;24:371-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00009-5
  3. Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.034
  4. Melsen B. Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 1999; 69:151-8.
  5. Nanda R, Kuhlberg A. Management of deep overbite malocclusion. In: Nanda R, ed. Biomechanics and esthetic strategies in clinical orthodontics. 1st ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 131-55.
  6. Burzin J, Nanda R. The stability of deep overbite correction. In: Nanda R, Burstone CJ, eds. Retention and stability in orthodontics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993.
  7. Burstone CJ. Biomechanics of deep overbite correction. Semin Orthod 2001;7:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1053/sodo.2001.21059
  8. Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 1981;52:314-20. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1981.52.6.314
  9. Batenhorst KF, Bowers GM, Williams JE Jr. Tissue changes resulting from facial tipping and extrusion of incisors in monkeys. J Periodontol 1974;45:660-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1974.45.9.660
  10. Thongudomporn U, Charoemratrote C, Jearapongpakorn S. Changes of anterior maxillary alveolar bone thickness following incisor proclination and extrusion. Angle Orthod 2015;85:549-54. https://doi.org/10.2319/051614-352.1
  11. Kaied IB, Tanielian RH. Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone support changes after incisal intrusion. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2012;13:60-71.
  12. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:734-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021
  13. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 1996;66:95-109; discussion 109-10.
  14. Vardimon AD, Oren E, Ben-Bassat Y. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:520-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70172-6
  15. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:534-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.008
  16. Kim Y, Park JU, Kook YA. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in surgical skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 2009;79:676-82. https://doi.org/10.2319/070308-341.1
  17. Lee KM, Kim YI, Park SB, Son WS. Alveolar bone loss around lower incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment in mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2012;82:637-44. https://doi.org/10.2319/081711-526.1
  18. Karagoz A. Derin ortulu kapanisli olgularda ust keser intruzyonunun konik isinli bilgisayarli tomografi ile incelenmesi. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University;2013.
  19. Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, Ariyurek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.119804
  20. Persson RE, Hollender LG, Laurell L, Persson GR. Horizontal alveolar bone loss and vertical bone defects in an adult patient population. J Periodontol 1998;69:348-56. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.348
  21. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:551-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021
  22. Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ, Lv P, Cao YM, Yu M, et al. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with conebeam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:245-52. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.245
  23. Yodthong N, Charoemratrote C, Leethanakul C. Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. Angle Orthod 2013;83:394-401. https://doi.org/10.2319/062912-534.1
  24. Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013;83:212-21. https://doi.org/10.2319/041812-325.1
  25. Picanco PR, Valarelli FP, Cancado RH, de Freitas KM, Picanco GV. Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: computerized tomography evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:91-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000500016
  26. Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional evaluation of periodontal remodeling during orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 2002;8:23-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/sodo.2002.28168
  27. Cobo J, Arguelles J, Puente M, Vijande M. Dentoalveolar stress from bodily tooth movement at different levels of bone loss. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:256-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80008-4
  28. Bimstein E, Crevoisier RA, King DL. Changes in the morphology of the buccal alveolar bone of protruded mandibular permanent incisors secondary to orthodontic alignment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:427-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70115-S
  29. Kalha A. Gingival recession and labial movement of lower incisors. Evid Based Dent 2013;14:21-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400917
  30. Aziz T, Flores-Mir C. A systematic review of the association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession. Aust Orthod J 2011;27:33-9.
  31. Cho SM, Choi SH, Sung SJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. The effects of alveolar bone loss and miniscrew position on initial tooth displacement during intrusion of the maxillary anterior teeth: Finite element analysis. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:310-22. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.5.310
  32. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e117-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.08.016

Cited by

  1. Pure Mandibular Incisor Intrusion: A Finite Element Study to Evaluate the Segmented Arch Technique vol.12, pp.17, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172784
  2. Geometric analysis of alveolar bone around the incisors after anterior retraction following premolar extraction vol.90, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2319/041419-266.1