Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회지)

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork

  • Kim, Gye-Woong (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Hack-Youn (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2018.08.07
  • Accepted : 2018.10.05
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the dressing percentage and physicochemical characteristics, such as fatty acid composition, water holding capacity (WHC), shear force, meat color, cooking loss, and sensory evaluation, of experimental pork obtained from a total of 12 standard pigs and sows. The water content of tenderloin (73.38%) was the highest in standard pork (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference in crude protein content was shown between standard pork and sow pork (p<0.05). There were significant differences between standard pork and sow pork in shear forces of loin and tenderloin (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in WHC between standard pork and sow pork in loin, tenderloin, and hind legs (p<0.05). The CIE $L^*$ and CIE $b^*$ values of standard loin were significantly higher than those of sow loin (p<0.05). The CIE $a^*$ values of sow loin were significantly higher than those of standard loin (p<0.05). The contents of arachidonic acid for standard pork and sow pork were 0.33% and 0.84%, respectively (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in the total content of unsaturated fatty acid between the two groups. There were no significant differences between standard pork and sow pork after sensory evaluation, except for color and tenderness. The overall acceptability of standard pork was significantly higher than that of sow pork (p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Candek-Potokar M, Lefaucheur L, Zlender B, Bonneau M. 1999. Effect of slaughter weight and/or age on histological characteristics of pig longissimus dorsi muscle as related to meat quality. Meat Sci 52:195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00168-5
  2. Candek-Potokar M, Z lender B, Lefaucheur L, Bonneau M. 1998. Effects of age and/or weight at slaughter on longissimus dorsi muscle: Biochemical traits and sensory quality in pigs. Meat Sci 48:287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00109-5
  3. Cho S, Seong P, Kang G, Choi S, Chang S, Kang SM, Park KM, Kim Y, Hong S, Park BY. 2012. Effect of age on chemical composition and meat quality for loin and top round of Hanwoo cow beef. Korean J Food Sci An 32:810-819. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2012.32.6.810
  4. Choi YS, Park BY, Lee JM, Lee SK. 2005. Comparison of carcass and meat quality characteristics between Korean native black pigs and commercial crossbred pigs. Korean J Food Sci An 25:322-327.
  5. Folch J, Lees M, Sloan-Stanley GH. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:497-509.
  6. Grau R, Hamm R. 1953. Eine einfache methode zur bestimmung der wasserbinding in muskel. Naturwissenschaften 40:29-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00595734
  7. In KK. 2013. Comparison of productivity and meat quality characteristics in the improved breed and Korean native pigs. Ph.D. dissertation, Kongju National Univ., Gongju, Korea.
  8. Jin SK, Kim IS, Song YM, Hur SJ, Hah KH, Kim HY, Lyou HJ, Ha JH, Kim BW. 2004. Physico-chemical characteristics of crossbred pigs with carcass grade. Korean J Food Sci An 24:246-252.
  9. Joo ST, Kauffman RG, Kim BC, Kim CJ. 1995. The relationship between color and water-holding capacity in post-rigor porcine longissimus muscle. J Muscle Foods 6:211-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.1995.tb00568.x
  10. Moon SS, Mullen AM, Troy DJ, Yang HS, Joo ST, Park GB. 2003. Effect of pig slaughter weight on pork quality. Korean J Food Sci An 23:315-320.
  11. Morin LA, Temelli F, Mcmullen L. 2002. Physical and sensory characteristics of reduced-fat breakfast sausages formulated with barely ${\beta}$-glucan. J Food Sci 67:2391-2396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09559.x
  12. Norman JL, Berg EP, Heymann H, Lorenzen CL. 2003. Pork loin color relative to sensory and instrumental tenderness and consumer acceptance. Meat Sci 65:927-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00310-8
  13. Park BY, Yoo YM, Cho SH, Chae HS, Kim JH, An JN, Lee JM, Yun SK. 2001. Studies on quality characteristics of pork classified by hunter L value. Korean J Food Sci An 21:323-328.
  14. Rhim TJ, Chung KY, Kim CJ. 1995. Composition and traits of carcass and tenderness of pork from barrows of different chronological ages. Korean J Food Sci An 15:117-121.
  15. Seong PN, Cho SH, Kim JH, Hah KH, Park BY, Kim DH, Lee JM, Ahn JN. 2008. Quality attributes of cooked pork hams manufactured with major hind leg muscles and longissimus dorsi. Korean J Food Sci An 28:160-164. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2008.28.2.160
  16. Shuler RO, Pate TD, Mandigo RW, Lucas LE. 1970. Influence of confinement, floor structure and slaughter weight on pork carcass characteristics. J Anim Sci 31:31-35. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.31131x
  17. Virgili R, Degni M, Scivazappa C, Faeti V, Poletti E, Marchetto G, Pacchioli MT, Mordeniti A. 2003. Effect of age at slaughter on carcass traits and meat quality of Italian heavy pigs. J Anim Sci 81:2448-2456. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81102448x
  18. Warner RD, Kauffman RG, Greaser ML. 1997. Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits. Meat Sci 45:339-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00116-7
  19. Warner RD, Kauffman RG, Russell RL. 1993. Quality attributes of major porcine muscle: A comparison with the longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci 33:359-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90007-5
  20. Xiong YL, Mullins OE, Stika JF, Blanchard SP, Moody WG. 2007. Tenderness and oxidative stability of post-mortem muscles from mature cows of various ages. Meat Sci 77:105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.012
  21. Zhu LG, Brewer MS. 1998. Discoloration of fresh pork as related to muscle and display conditions. J Food Sci 63:763-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb17895.x

Cited by

  1. Factors influencingmicrobial transmission in a meat processing plant vol.6, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438x-2021-6-2-183-190