한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문헌정보학 학술지 논문의 결론 구조 분석

The Structure of Research Article Conclusions in Library and Information Science Journals

  • 투고 : 2018.08.11
  • 심사 : 2018.09.04
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 문헌정보학 학술지 논문의 결론 부분의 구조와 유형을 밝힌 연구이다. 문헌정보학의 4개 학술지 논문의 결론 장(chapter)을 분석하여 '연구 관심 끌어내기', '요약하기', '논의하기', '적용하기', '확대하기' 의 5개 상위범주와 11개의 하위요소를 도출하여 이를 결론 구조의 분석도구로 적용하였다. 연구 결과, 문헌정보학 학술지 논문의 결론 제목은 '결론'이 절반 이상이며, 그 다음은 '결론 및 제언' 이다. 결론 장은 평균 4.2개의 구성요소로 구성되었다. 각 구성요소별 출현빈도는 '연구결과 요약'이 단연 우세하며, '연구 전체 과정 요약', '후속연구 제언', '연구 의의' 순 이었다. 서술 분량도 '연구결과 요약'이 가장 우세하며, 결론의 절반 이상을 차지하였다. 출현빈도가 가장 높은 상위범주는 '요약하기'이며, 그 다음은 '확대하기', '적용하기' 순 이었다. 결론을 시작하는 첫 번째 요소로 가장 우세한 요소는 '연구결과 요약'이며, 결론을 마무리하는 최종 요소로 가장 우세한 것은 '후속연구 제언'이다. 결론 구조의 패턴은 도입부가 '연구 전체 과정 요약-연구결과 요약'순이 가장 빈번하게 나타났다 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 결론 구조의 핵심 구성요소이자 핵심기능은 '요약하기'의 구성요소인 '연구결과 요약'과 '연구전체 과정 요약'이다. 이는 결론을 기술하는 필수요소로 밝혀졌다. '적용하기', '확대하기'에 포함된 여타의 요인은 선별적 요인으로 적용하고 있었다.

The purpose of this study was to identify the structure and pattern of conclusions chapters in research articles selected in four representative journals published in Korean LIS. To analyse the structure and pattern five categories and eleven elements drawn from RA conclusions were used such as 'Drawing Attention', 'Summarizing', 'Discussing', 'Applying' and 'Extending'. The Findings are as follows. 'Conclusions' was the most used title of the chapter, and then 'conclusions and suggestions'. The conclusions sections were consisted averagely 4.2 elements. 'Summary of findings' was the most frequently elements, followed by 'summary of research process', 'suggestion of further research' and 'implication'. Also, 'summary of findings' was the most used in lengths. 'Summarizing' was the highest frequency in five categories, followed by 'Extending', and 'Applying'. The dominant first element begun conclusions sections was 'summary of findings' and the final element closed conclusion was 'suggestion of further research'. 'Summary of research process - summary of findings' order was found in the most frequent pattern of conclusions. 'Summary of findings' and 'summary of research processes' in 'Summarizing' were found as essential functions, while other elements, such as significance, 'application', 'limitations' in 'Applying' and 'Extending' were found as optional functions in the conclusions of Korean LIS research articles.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang, Min-Kyung.2015. "A Study on the Move in Dissertation Abstracts." Journal of Language Sciences, 22(1): 23-48. https://doi.org/10.14384/kals.2015.22.1.023
  2. Kim, Young-kyu & Eun-ha Lee, 2008. "A Genre-Analytic Study of Korean Research Article Introductions with a Focus on Content Analysis." Bilingual Research, 6: 43-67.
  3. Park, Soo Yeon. 2016. A Study on the Genre Analysis of the Korean Literature Review Sections in the Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations in Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language: Implications for KAP Thesis Writing Instruction. Ph.D. diss., The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Korea.
  4. Park, Eun Sun. 2006. "A Genre Analysis of Introductions in Korean Theses Based on the CARS+3 Model." Journal of Korean Language Education, 17: 191-210.
  5. Park, Ji Hee. 2016. The Genre Analysis on Business Master Thesis for Korean Language Writing Education of Academic Purpose : Focusing on the Conclusion Major in Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language. M. A., thesis., The Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  6. [Seo, Ji Hye] 2012. Genre Analysis of the Conclusion of Korean Thesis : Based on the Comparison with the Conclusion of Korean Aacademic Papers. M. A., thesis., The Graduate School, Yonsei University, Korea.
  7. Yu, Minae. 2015. "A Study on Teaching to Writing Abstracts of Dissertation for Korean Learners." Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8): 639-661.
  8. Yoon, Yeook.2011. A Genre-Analytic Study of the Methods Sectionsin MA Theses Written in Korean: Implications for KAP Thesis Writing Instruction. M.A. thesis., The Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  9. Lee, SooYeon. 2011. A Genre-Analytic Study of the Korean Abstract Sections in MA and PhD Theses Written in Korean: Implications for KAP Thesis Writing Instruction. M.A. thesis. The Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  10. Lee, Sunyoung. 2015. Study on the Genre Comparative Analysis in MA Theses for KAP Thesis Writing Instruction: Focusing on the Literature Review Section. M.A. thesis. The Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  11. Lee, Seul.2016. Genre Analysis Study on the Introductions in Korean Business Theses Based on the Bunton's Modified CARS+2 Model. M.A. thesis., The Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  12. Lee, JuHee. 2012. A Genre-Analytic Study of the Conclusions Sectionsin MA Theses Written in Korean: Implications for KAP Theses. M.A. thesis., The Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  13. Chang, Woo-Kwon. 2016. "A Study on the Structure and Content of Abstracts : Focused on Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(3): 107-131. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.107
  14. Chang, Hye-Rhan.1996. "An Analysis of Current States and Information Content of Author Abstracts in the Field of Social Sciences." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 30:35-48.
  15. Cho, Eun Young. 2012. A Genre-Analytic Study of the Korean Abstract Sections in MA and PhD Theses Written in Korean: Implications for KAP Thesis Writing Instruction. M.A. thesis. The Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  16. Al-Khasawneh, Fadi Maher. 2017. "A Genre Analysis of Research Article Abstracts Written by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English." Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1):1-13.
  17. Bitchener, J. 2010. Writing and Applied Linguistics Thesis or Dissertation: A Guide to Presenting Empirical Research. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Brett, P. 1994. "A Genre Analysis of the Results Section of Sociology Articles." English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8
  19. Bruce, Ian, 2008. "Cognitive Genre Structures in Methods Sections of Research Articles: A Corpus Study." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1): 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001
  20. Bruce, Ian, 2008. "Results Sections in Sociology and Organic Chemistry Articles: A Genre Analysis." English for Specific Purposes, 28(2):105-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
  21. Bunton, David, 2005. "The Structure of PhD Conclusion Chapters." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3): 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004
  22. Cotos, Elena, Sarah Huffman, & Stephanie Link. 2017. "A Move/Step model for Methods Sections: Demonstrating Rigour and Credibility." English for Specific Purposes, 46: 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
  23. Darabad, Ali Mohammadi. 2016. "Move Analysis of Research Article Abstracts: A Cross-Disciplinary Study." International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2): 125-140. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379
  24. Dudley-Evans, Tony. 1994. Genre analysis: An Approach to Test Analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge. 210-228.
  25. Hewing, M. 1993. The End! How to Conclude a Dissertation. In G. M. Blue (Ed.), Language, Learning and Success: Studying through English. London: Modern English Publications and The British Council, Macmillan.
  26. Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, A. 1988. "A Genre-Based Investigations of the Discussions Sections in Articles and Dissertation." English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
  27. Jahangard, Ali, Amin Rajabi-Kondlaji, and Karim Khalaji. 2014. "A Comparison of Moves in Conclusion Sections of Research Articles in Mechanical Engineering and Allied Linguistics." International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(2): 346-359.
  28. Kim Eungi. 2014. "An Analysis of Move Patterns in Abstracts of Social Sciences Research." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(2): 283-309. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.2.201406.283
  29. Kim, Eungi. 2015. "Remnants of Culture in Journal Article Titles: A Comparison between the United States and Korea in the Field of Social Sciences." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(1): 345-372. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.1.201503.345
  30. Kim, Eungi. 2016. "Abstracts in Medical Science Journals: An Analysis of Subheadings in Structured Abstracts." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1): 199-216. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.1.201603.199
  31. Kwan, Becky S.C. 2006. "The Schematic Structure of Literature Reviews in Doctoral Theses of Applied Linguistics." English for Specific Purposes, 25(1): 30-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
  32. Lindeberg, A.C. 1994. An Exploratory Study of Knowledge Claims in Article Introductions in Three Disciplines: Finance, Management, and Marketing. In M. Majapuro, & T. Nikko (Eds.), Talous ja kieli II (Business and Language II). Helsinki: Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration: 647-655.
  33. Lores, R. 2004. "On RA Abstracts: From Rhetorical Structure to Thematic Organization." Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 23: 280-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
  34. Maswana, S., & T. Kanamaru, & A. Tajino. 2015. "Move Analysis of Research Articles across Five Engineering Fields: What They Share and What They Do Not." Ampersand, 2(1-11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.002
  35. Morales, R. C. 2012. "Conclusions in Research Articles: A Filipino-Japanese Contrastive Rhetorical Study." Philippine ESL Journal, 8 [Available on-line]. [cited 2018. 8. 10].
  36. Ozturk, I. 2007. "The Textual Organization of Research Article Introductions in Applied Linguistics: Variability within a Single Discipline." English for Specific Purposes, 26(1): 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003
  37. Peacock, M. 2002. "Communicative Moves in the Discussion Section of Research Articles." System, 30(4), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
  38. Samraj, B. 2005. "An Exploration of a Genre Set: Research Article Abstracts and Introductions in Two Disciplines." English for Specific Purposes, 24(2): 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
  39. Sollaci, Luciana B. and Mauricio G. Pereira. 2004. "The Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) Structure: A Fifty-Year Survey." J Med Libr Assoc. 92(3): 364-371.
  40. Soler-Monreal, Carmen. 2015. "A Move-Step Analysis of the Concluding Chapters in Computer Science PhD Theses." n Europea de Lenguas para Fines Espec. IBERICA, 32: 105-132. [cited 2017. 7. 30].
  41. Swales J. M., & Feak, C. 2004. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  42. Tseng, F. 2011. "Analyses of Move Structure and Verb Tense of Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics Journals." International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2).
  43. Wu, Jianguo. 2011. "Improving the Writing of Research Papers: IMRAD and Beyond." Landscape Ecology, 26(10): 1345-1349. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-011-9674-3
  44. Yang, Ruiying and Desmond Allison. 2003. "Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Moving from Results to Conclusions." English for Specific Purposes, 22: 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
  45. Yaghoubi-Notash, M., & H. Tarlani Aliabadi. 2012. "A Matter of Who Writes: Generic Variations in Applied Linguists RAs by English vs. Persian Writers." International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2): 227-235.
  46. Zamani, G. & Ebadi, S. 2016. "Move Aanalysis of the Conclusion Sections of Research Papers in Persian and English." Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 11(1): 9-20. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v11i1.344