DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of body condition score at calving on the metabolic status and production performance of Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) during the transition period

  • Delfino, Nelson Carvalho (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)) ;
  • de Aragao Bulcao, Lucas Fialho (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)) ;
  • Alba, Henry Daniel Ruiz (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)) ;
  • da Silva Oliveira, Mauricio Xavier (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)) ;
  • de Queiroz, Filipe Pinheiro Soares (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)) ;
  • de Carvalho, Gleidson Giordano Pinto (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)) ;
  • Renno, Francisco Palma (Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo (USP)) ;
  • de Freitas, Jose Esler Junior (Department of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA))
  • Received : 2017.03.24
  • Accepted : 2017.07.11
  • Published : 2018.11.01

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of body condition score (BCS) at calving on the metabolic status of female Murrah buffaloes in the transition period. Methods: Thirty-seven pregnant buffaloes (multiparous) were selected and monitored during the transition period based on their body condition score and on the estimated calving date. Two groups were formed: i) buffaloes with a BCS>3.5 (n = 17); this group was classified and named 'high BCS at calving' (HBCS); and ii) buffaloes with a $BCS{\leq}3.5$ (n = 20); this group was classified and named 'low BCS at calving' (LBCS). All animals were monitored during the last 30 days of pregnancy and the first 70 days post-calving and kept in the same environment and under the same feeding and management conditions. Mean values for BCS at calving were $2.98{\pm}0.9$ (mean${\pm}$standard error of the mean [SEM]) and $4.21{\pm}0.9$ (mean${\pm}$SEM) for the HBCS and LBCS groups, respectively. Results: The HBCS group showed higher milk fat content (p = 0.007) and milk fat yield (p = 0.027) and a higher concentration of milk urea nitrogen (p = 0.001) than LBCS buffaloes, which in turn had a lower urine pH value (p = 0.033) than HBCS buffaloes in the pre-calving period (7.86 for HBCS vs 7.76 for LBCS). The HBCS animals had a higher concentration of erythrocytes (p = 0.001) and hematocrit (p = 0.012) post-calving and a higher hemoglobin concentration (p = 0.004) pre-calving. Conclusion: Buffaloes during the transition period exhibited some variations in the oxidative stress related to their metabolic status. After calving, buffaloes with a high BCS at calving and greater lipid mobilization have a more marked alteration in oxidative status, but improved production performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Grummer RR, Mashek DG, Hayirli A. Dry matter intake and energy balance in the transition period. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2004;20:447-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2004.06.013
  2. Al Ibrahim RM, Kelly AK, O'Grady L, et al. The effect of body condition score at calving and supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production, metabolic status, and rumen fermentation of dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:5318-28. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3201
  3. Berry DP, Lee JM, Macdonald KA, Roche JR. Body condition score and body weight effects on dystocia and stillbirths and consequent effects on postcalving performance. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:4201-11. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0023
  4. Beever DE. The impact of controlled nutrition during the dry period on dairy cow health, fertility and performance. Anim Reprod Sci 2006;96:212-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.002
  5. Renno FP, Pereira JC, Santos ADF, et al. Effects of body condition at calving on milk yield and composition, lactation curve and body reserve mobilization of Holstein cows. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2006;58:220-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000200011
  6. Celi P, Bush DR. Pregnancy, lambing and survival. In: Cottle D, editor. International sheep and wool handbook. Nottingham University Press; 2010. p. 223-57.
  7. Anita A, Bao KS, Suresh J, Moorthy RRS, Reddy YK. A body condition score (BCS) system in murrah buffalos. Buffalo Bull 2011;30:77-99.
  8. Freitas Jr JE, Rocha Jr VR, Renno FP, et al. Effect of body condition score at calving on productive performance of crossbred Holstein-Zebu cows. Rev Bras Zootec 2008;37:116-21.
  9. Paul SS, Lal D. Nutrient requirements of buffaloes. Satish Serial Publishing House; 2010.
  10. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) International. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
  11. Hall MB. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain non-protein nitrogen. Gainesville, FL, USA: University of Florida; 2000. p. A-25 (Bulletin-339).
  12. Di Palo R. Buffalo milk production with traditional diet and with the use of fatty acids [Ph D Thesis]. Naples, Italy: University of Naples; 1992.
  13. Campanile G, Neglia G, DiPalo R, et al. Relationship of body condition score and blood urea and ammonia to pregnancy in Italian Mediterranean buffaloes. Reprod Nutr 2006;46:57-62. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005066
  14. SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Institute Inc. User's guide: statistics, version 9. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inst Inc; 2004.
  15. Roche JR, Berry DP, Kolver ES. Holstein-Friesian strain and feed effects on milk production, body weight, and body condition score profiles in grazing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:3532-43. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72393-1
  16. Roche JR. Milk production responses to pre- and post-calving dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows. Livest Sci 2007;110:12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.08.016
  17. Bauman DE. Regulation of nutrient partitioning during lactation: Homeostasis and homeorhesis revisited. In: Cronje PB, editor. Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2000. p. 311-28.
  18. Roche JR, Turner LR, Lee JM, et al. Weather, herbage quality and milk production in pastoral systems. 2. Temporal patterns and intra-relationships in herbage quality and mineral concentration parameters. Anim Prod Sci 2009;49:200-10. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07308
  19. Lacetera N, Scalia D, Bernabucci U, et al. Lymphocyte functions in overconditioned cows around parturition. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:2010-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72877-0
  20. Shingu H, Hayashi H, Touno E, et al. Characteristics of developmental changes in the kinetics of glucose and urea in Japanese Black calves: comparison with Holstein calves. J Anim Sci 2007;85:2910-5. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0100
  21. Ganaie AH, Shanker G, Bumla NA, Ghasura RS, Mir NA. Biochemical and physiological changes during thermal stress in bovines. J Vet Sci Technol 2013;4:1000126.
  22. Celi P, Di Trana A, Quaranta A. Metabolic profile and oxidative status in goats during the peripartum period. Aust J Exp Agric 2008;48: 1004-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07410
  23. Bell AW. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J Anim Sci 1995;73:2804-19. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7392804x
  24. Mushtaq A, Qureshi MS, Khan S, et al. Body condition score as marker of milk yield and composition in dairy animals. J Anim Plant Sci 2012; 22:169-73.
  25. Bach A, Calsamiglia S, Stern MD. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:9-21. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73133-7
  26. Roy B, Brahma B, Ghosh S, Pankaj PK, Mandal G. Evaluation of milk urea concentration as useful indicator for dairy herd management: a review. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2011;6:1-19. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2011.1.19
  27. Brun-Hansen HC, Kampen AH, Lund A. Hematologic values in calves during the first 6 months of life. Vet Clin Pathol 2006;35:182-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2006.tb00111.x
  28. Graugnard DE, Bionaz M, Trevisi E, et al. Blood immunometabolic indices and polymorphonuclear neutrophil function in peripartum dairy cows are altered by level of dietary energy prepartum. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:1749-58. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4579
  29. Lager K, Jordan E. The metabolic profile for the modern transition dairy cow. In: Jordan E, editor. Proceedings of the midsouth ruminant nutrition conference 2012. Grapevine, TX, USA: Texas A and M University; 2012. p. 9-16.
  30. Alvarenga EA, Moreira GHFA, Facury Filho EJ, et al. Evaluation of the metabolic profile of Holstein cows during the transition period. Rev Bras Zootec 2015;35:281-90.
  31. Sundrum A. Metabolic disorders in the transition period indicate that the dairy cows' ability to adapt is overstressed. Animals (Basel) 2015; 5:978-1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5040395
  32. Fiore E, Barberio A, Morgante M, et al. Glucose infusion response to some biochemical parameters in dairy cows during the transition period. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2015;33:129-36.
  33. Hall MB. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain non-protein nitrogen. University of Florida; Gainesville, FL, USA: 2000. p. A-25. (Bulletin 339).

Cited by

  1. Milk yield and composition, blood, and urinary parameters of Murrah buffaloes in different maturity stages during the transition period and early lactation vol.49, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1940188