DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

말기 암환자 가족의 대리적 연명의료 결정에 대한 치료결정 후회 및 심리적 스트레스: 경로모형 분석

Family Surrogates' Decision Regret and Psychological Stress about End-of-Life Cancer Treatments: Path Analysis

  • 김수현 (경북대학교 간호대학, 간호과학연구소)
  • Kim, Su Hyun (College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.10
  • 심사 : 2018.09.14
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to understand the mechanisms of decision regret and stress of family surrogates' end-of-life decision making using an exploratory path model. In particular, the research identified the direct effects of perceptions of uncertainty and effective decisions on decision regret and stress, and examined the indirect effects of being informed, having clear values, and being supported for decision regret and the stress of end-of-life decision making through the mediating variables of perceptions of uncertainty and effective decisions. Methods: Data were collected from 102 family surrogates who had participated in end-of-life decision making for patients with terminal cancer in a tertiary hospital. Results: Perception of effective decisions was a significant direct predictor of decision regret, and uncertainty was a significant predictor of stress among the participants. Being informed, having clear values, and being supported had a significant indirect influence on decision regret through the perception of effective decisions among family surrogates. However, only having clear values had a significant indirect influence on stress through the perception of uncertainty. The model explained 63.0% of decision regret and 20.0% of stress among the participants and showed a good fit with the data, ${\chi}^2=12.40$ (df=8, p=.134), TLI=.97, and RMSEA=.07. Conclusion: Nurses can support family surrogates in end-of-life decision-making processes to decrease their decision regret by providing information about end-of-life care choices, clarifying personal values, and supporting the decision-making process, and to relieve their stress by facilitating the clarification of personal values.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Government Legislation. Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Government Legislation; c2016 [cited 2018 Jan 2]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/법령/호스피스.완화의료및임종과정에있는환자의연명의료결정에관한법률/(14013,20160203).
  2. Lee GS, Jung HS, Hwang SY, Choi DB. Effective management plan for health care expenditure for older adults in preparation of older society. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health & Welfare Policy; 2017. p. 62.
  3. Bioethics Policy Research Center. Survey on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and advanced directives. Seoul: Bioethics Policy Research Center; 2011. p. 8.
  4. Hussey PS, Wertheimer S, Mehrotra A. The association between health care quality and cost: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013;158(1):27-34. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00006
  5. Teno JM, Curtis JR. Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA Oncology. 2016;2(7):957-958. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0441
  6. Lee JK, Keam B, An AR, Kim TM, Lee SH, Kim DW, et al. Surrogate decision-making in Korean patients with advanced cancer: A longitudinal study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013;21(1):183-190. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1509-5
  7. Chang WK, Ahn KJ, Kim MY, Kim YR, Han YJ. The role of a patient's family when the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is expected: A narrative analysis. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015;18(2):172-189.
  8. Hickman RL Jr, Daly BJ, Lee E. Decisional conflict and regret: Consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Applied Nursing Research. 2012;25(4):271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2011.03.003
  9. Park EY. The experience of family members on deciding to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for patients who are terminally ill [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2003. p . 1-110.
  10. Zeelenberg M, van Dijk WW, Manstead AS. Regret and responsibility resolved? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly's (2000) conclusions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000;81(1):143-154. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2865
  11. Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Medical Decision Making. 2003;23(4):281-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X03256005
  12. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making. 1995;15(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9501500105
  13. Sun Q. Predicting downstream effects of high decisional conflict: Meta-analyses of the decisional conflict scale [master's thesis]. Ottawa (ON): University of Ottawa; 2005. p. 1-82.
  14. Becerra Perez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Legare F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: A systematic review. Medical Decision Making. 2016;36(6):777-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X16636113
  15. Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: The effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;154(5):336-346. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00008
  16. O'Connor AM. User manual-Decisional conflict scale [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; c1993 [cited 2018 Feb 1]. Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf.
  17. Ivo K, Younsuck K, Ho YY, Sang-Yeon S, Seog HD, Hyunah B, et al. A survey of the perspectives of patients who are seriously ill regarding end-of-life decisions in some medical institutions of Korea, China and Japan. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2012;38(5):310-316. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100153
  18. Lee J, Jung D, Choi M. Relationship of social support and decisional conflict to advance directives attitude in Korean older adults: A community-based cross-sectional study. Japan Journal of Nursing Science. 2016;13(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12081
  19. Gong HS, Park JW, Shin YH, Kim K, Cho KJ, Baek GH. Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017;18(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4
  20. Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, Chang YJ, Shin A, Noh DY, et al. Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Annals of Oncology. 2015;26(9):1974-1980. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv275
  21. Jeon BM, Kim SH, Lee SJ. Decisional conflict in end-of-life cancer treatment among family surrogates: A cross-sectional survey. Nursing & Health Sciences. Forthcoming 2018 Jun 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12537
  22. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research. 1987;16(1):78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
  23. Cha ES, Park MY, Kim GA. A comparison analysis of somatotype, physical activity, mental health, healthy behavior between normal weight and overweight college students in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. 2008;8(4):245-255.
  24. Kellar SP, Kelvin EA. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013. p. 365.
  25. Hamano J, Morita T, Fukui S, Kizawa Y, Tunetou S, Shima Y, et al. Trust in physicians, continuity and coordination of care, and quality of death in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2017;20(11):1252-1259. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0049
  26. Shim HY, Park JH, Kim SY, Shin DW, Shin JY, Park BY, et al. Discordance between perceived and actual cancer stage among cancer patients in Korea: A nationwide survey. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e90483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090483
  27. Johnson S, Butow P, Kerridge I, Tattersall M. Advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of perceptions and experiences of patients, families, and healthcare providers. Psycho-Oncology. 2016;25(4):362-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3926
  28. Chiarchiaro J, Buddadhumaruk P, Arnold RM, White DB. Prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict among surrogates for critically ill patients. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2015;12(10):1528-1533. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-253OC
  29. Hecker K. Critical synthesis package: Decisional conflict scale (DCS). MedEdPORTAL. 2015;11:10273. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10273
  30. Cardona-Morrell M, Benfatti-Olivato G, Jansen J, Turner RM, Fajardo-Pulido D, Hillman K. A systematic review of effectiveness of decision aids to assist older patients at the end of life. Patient Education and Counseling. 2017;100(3):425-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.007
  31. Pignatiello G, Hickman RL Jr, Hetland B. End-of-life decision support in the ICU: Where are we now? Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2018;40(1):84-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916676542
  32. Cuypers M, Lamers RE, Kil PJ, van de Poll-Franse LV, de Vries M. Impact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0750-x

피인용 문헌

  1. 만성 심폐질환을 가진 말기 노인 환자의 연명의료 의사결정의 번복 및 관련 요인 vol.49, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.3.329
  2. 연명의료결정법의 시행과 제도적 실현을 위한 방안 vol.16, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22730/jmls.2019.16.3.80
  3. Life-Sustaining Treatment in End-Stage Liver Disease Patients: Patients' Decisions and Results vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.85
  4. A Mixed Method Study for Exploring the Difficulties in End-of-Life Care and End-of-Life Care Competency in Nurses Who Take Care of Cancer Patients vol.21, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2021.21.2.98
  5. 심폐소생 금지 대리 결정에 대한 요양병원 노인 환자 가족의 인식 유형: Q 방법론적 접근 vol.51, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.20188
  6. 암환자의 사전연명의료의향서 지식과 좋은 죽음 인식이 연명의료중단 태도에 미치는 영향 vol.22, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2021.22.2.539