한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제51권10호
  • /
  • Pages.929-939
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

북한지역 수력발전댐 개발가능지점에 대한 연간가능발생전력량 분석 및 개발 우선순위 평가

Priority assessment and estimation of annual power generation for potential development site of hydroelectric dam in North Korea

  • 권민성 (서경대학교 도시안전연구센터) ;
  • 김태웅 (한양대학교 공학대학 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 안재현 (서경대학교 토목건축공학과)
  • Kwon, Minsung (Urban Risk Management Research Center, Seokyeong University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Woong (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University (ERICA)) ;
  • Ahn, Jaehyun (Department of Civil & Architectural Engineering, Seokyeong University)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.08
  • 심사 : 2018.09.10
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

북한은 수력발전이 전체 발전량의 약 63%를 차지할 만큼 비중이 높고, 지리적으로 수력발전 개발에 많은 이점을 가지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 33개의 북한 댐개발 가능지점에 대해 DEM자료를 이용하여 유역분석 및 저수량을 산정하고, MWSWAT 모델을 이용한 30년간의 장기유출 분석 결과를 적용하여 연간가능발생전력량을 추정하였다. 33개 지점의 연간가능발생전력량은 현재 북한 수력발전량의 약 28% 수준으로 평가되었다. 또한 도별 공업지구 규모를 추정하고, 장래 인구 변동을 전망하여 도별 댐개발 우선순위를 선정하고, 저수량과 연간가능발생전력량을 기초로 도내 댐개발 우선선위를 선정하였다. 도별 우선순위는 평안남도, 함경남도, 함경북도, 황해북도, 평안북도, 자강도, 량강도, 황해남도, 강원도 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 북한지역의 수력발전댐 개발사업의 진출을 위한 초기 검토 자료로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

In North Korea, hydropower which occupies about 63% of power generation is a major electric power source, and North Korea has many advantages in the geographical for developing hydroelectric power. In this study, Information on the basin and dam capacity for 33 potential development site of hydroelectric dam was analyzed using DEM, and potential annual power generation was estimated by applying results of long-term runoff simulation with MWSWAT model for recent 30-year. The potential annual power generation at 33 dam was estimated to be about 28% of the current hydroelectric power in North Korea. In addition, a priority of dam development in each province was assessed by estimating the scale of an industry and prospecting the population change in the future. And a priority for dam development within the province was estimated based on the dam capacity and the potential annual power generation. The priority of each province was ranked in order of Pyeongannamdo, Hamgyungnamdo, Hamgyungbukdo, Hwanghaebukdo, Pyeonganbukdo, Jagangdo, Ryanggangdo, Hwanghaenamdo, and Gangwondo. The results of this study can be used as an initial review data for advancing to hydropower development project in North Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chiaki, S. (1994). Practice of hydroelectric power generation, GTS, Gumi, p. 418.
  2. Choi, J. (2015) Demographic structural change in North Korean and it's implications. Bank of Korea, Seoul, p. 26
  3. Eo, G., Lee, C. H., Sim, O. B., and Ahn, J. (2018). "An evaluation on power generation of water resources facilities in North Korea considering climate change." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 355-369. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2018.51.4.355
  4. Jeong, H.-G., Kim, S. J., and Ha, R. (2013). "Assessment of climate change impact on storage behavior of chungju and the regulation dams using SWAT model." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association. Vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 1235-1247. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.12.1235
  5. KEPCO (2017). Statistics of electric power in Korea. Korea Electric Power Corporation, Naju, p. 179.
  6. Kim D. S. (2010). Analysis of North Korean population census. Statistics Korea, Daejeon, p. 355.
  7. Kim G. S. (2015a). North Korea energy statistics. Statistics Korea, Daejeon, p. 10.
  8. Kim S. G. (2015b). "Analysis of demographic trends in North Korea: Focused on data analysis." KDI North Korea Economic Review, Vol. 3, pp. 39-68.
  9. KINU (2001). Industrial location in North Korea and inter-Korean cooperation. Korea Institute for National Unification, Seoul, p. 128.
  10. KRIHS (2013). Major development project for the integrated Korea peninsula. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Sejong, p. 258.
  11. K-water (1994). Status and sevelopment trend of water resources in North Korea. K-water, Daejeon, p. 370.
  12. K-water (1998). Study on the water Resources of North Korea. K-water, Daejeon, p. 171.
  13. K-water (2003). Study on the future prospect of water industry in North Korea and the participation strategy. K-water, Daejeon, p. 326.
  14. K-water (2005). Study on the advancement of hydropower generation project in North Korea. K-water, Daejeon, p. 370
  15. K-water (2006). Design criteria for a hydroelectric power generation facility. K-water, Daejeon, p. 592.
  16. Lee, S. (2011). Analysis and problems of the 2008 North Korean population census. Korea Development Institute, Seoul, p. 101.
  17. MLTM (2011). Dam design criteria. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Gwacheon, p. 231.
  18. NKST (1990). Compendium of geography of Chosun: Hydrology geography, North Korean Science and Technology, Pyeongyang, p. 505.
  19. Park, J., Jang, Y., and Seo, D. (2017). "Water quality prediction of inflow of the Yongdam dam basin and its reservoir using SWAT and CE-QUAL-W2 models in series to climate change scenarios." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 703-714. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2017.50.10.703
  20. Park, M., and Ahn, J. (2018). "A Study on the evaluation of potential hydro-electric power in North Korea." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 41-49. https://doi.org/10.12652/KSCE.2018.38.1.0041
  21. Yoon J. (2016). "Status of North Korean electric power industry and case of Germany integration." KDI North Korea Economic Review, Vol. 5, pp. 17-31.