국제강구조저널 (International journal of steel structures)

  • 제18권4호
  • /
  • Pages.1325-1335
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-2351(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6311(eISSN)
한국강구조학회 (Korean Society of Steel Construction)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of MRS and SMA Dampers Effects on Bridge Seismic Resistance Employing Analytical Models

  • Choi, Eunsoo (Department of Civil Engineering, Hongik University) ;
  • Jeon, Jong-Su (Department of Civil Engineering, Andong National University) ;
  • Kim, Woo Jin (Department of Materials and Science and Engineering, Hongik University) ;
  • Kang, Joo-Won (School of Architecture, Yeungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.15
  • 심사 : 2018.07.05
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study dealt with investigating the seismic performance of the smart and shape memory alloy (SMA) and magnets plus rubber-spring (MRS) dampers and their effects on the seismic resistance of multiple-span simply supported bridges. The rubber springs in the MRS dampers were pre-compressed. For this aim, a set of experimental works was performed together with developing nonlinear analytical models to investigate dynamic responses of the bridges subjected to earthquakes. Fragility analysis and probabilistic assessment were conducted to assess the seismic performance for the overall bridge system. Fragility curves were then generated for each model and were compared with those of as-built. Results showed dampers could increase the seismic capacity of bridges. Furthermore, from system fragility curves, use of damper models reduced the seismic vulnerability in comparison to the as-built bridge model. Although the SMA damper showed the best seismic performance, the MRS damper was the most appropriate one for the bridge in that the combination of magnetic friction and pre-compressed rubber springs was cheaper than the shape memory alloy, and had the similar capability of the damper.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Hongik University

참고문헌

  1. Adanur, S., Altunisik, A. C., Basaga, H. B., Soyluk, K., & Dumanoglu, A. A. (2017). Wave-passage effect on the seismic response of suspension bridges considering local soil conditions. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(2), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-6010-z
  2. Adanur, S., Altunisik, A. C., Soyluk, K., Bayraktar, A., & Dumanoglu, A. A. (2016). Multiple-support seismic response of bosporus suspension bridge for various random vibration methods. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 5, 5-67.
  3. Alam, S. H., Nehdi, M., & Youssef, M. A. (2009). Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Structures and Systems, 5(5), 565-585. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2009.5.5.565
  4. CALTRANS. (1990). Bridge design specification manual. California Department of Transportation.
  5. Caterino, N., Maddaloni, G., & Occhiuzzi, A. (2014). Damage analysis and seismic retrofitting of a continuous prestresses reinforced concrete bridge. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 2, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2014.06.001
  6. Chen, W., & Duan, L. (2003). Brige engineering seismic design. Cambridge: CRC Press.
  7. Choi, E. (2002). Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid - America bridges. Ph.D. Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
  8. Choi, G. (2016). Development of a smart damper by combining friction of magnets and self - centering of pre - compressed rubber springs. M.S. Thesis, Hongik Univeresity, Seoul.
  9. Choi, E., Choi, G., Kim, H., & Youn, H. (2015). Smart damper using the combination of magnetic friction and pre-compressed rubber springs. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 351, 68-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.028
  10. Choi, E., Kim, D. J., Lee, J. H., & Ryu, G. S. (2017). Monotonic and hysteretic pullout behavior of superelastic SMA fibers with different anchorages. Composites: Part B, 108, 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.080
  11. Choi, E., Lee, D. H., & Choei, N. Y. (2009). Shape memory alloy bending bars as seismic restrainers for bridges in seismic areas. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9(4), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249500
  12. Choi, E., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2018). A new experimental investigation into the effects of reinforcing mortar beams with superelastic SMA fibers on controlling and closing cracks. Composites:Part B, 137, 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.017
  13. Choi, E., Park, S., Yoon, D., & Park, C. (2010). Comparison of seismic performance of three restrainers for multiple-span bridges using fragility analysis. Nonlinear Dynamics, 61(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9633-6
  14. Copper, J., Friedland, I., Buckle, I., Nimis, R., & Bob, N. (1994). The Northridge earthquake: progress made, lessons learned in seismicresistant bridge design. Public Roads, 58, 26-36.
  15. Fiore, A., Marano, G. C., Greco, R., & Mastromarino, E. (2016). Structural optimization of hollow-section steel trusses by differential evolution algorithm. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(2), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-6013-1
  16. Ghassemieh, M., Bahaari, M. R., Ghodratian, S. M., & Nojoumi, S. A. (2012). Improvement of concrete shear wall structures by smart materials. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2012.23014
  17. Han, S. H., Cho, H. N., Cho, T. J., Shin, S. W., & Kim, T. S. (2010). Risk assessments of long-span bridges considering life-cycle cost concept and near-fault ground motion effect. International Journal of Steel Structures, 10(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249511
  18. HAZUS. (1997). Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Federal emergency management agency.
  19. Hedayati Dezfuli, F., Li, S., Alam, M. S., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). Effect of constitutive models on the seismic response of an SMA-LRB isolated highway bridge. Engineering Structures, 148, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.036
  20. Isalgue, A., Lovey, F. C., Terriault, P., Martorell, F., Torra, R. M., & Torra, V. (2006). SMA for dampers in civil engineering. Materials Transactions, 47(3), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.47.682
  21. Jeon, J., Shafieezadeh, A., Lee, D., Choi, E., & DesRoches, R. (2015). Damage assessment of older highway bridges subjected to three-dimensional ground motions: Characterization of shear-axial force interaction on seismic fragilities. Engineering Structures, 87, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.015
  22. Jiang, X., Su, Q., Han, X., Shao, C., & Chen, L. (2017). Experimental study and numerical analysis on mechanical behavior of T-shape stiffened orthotropic steel-concrete composite bridge decks. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(3), 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-9004-y
  23. Kasano, H., Yoda, T., Nogami, K., Murakoshi, J., Toyama, N., Sawada, M., et al. (2012). Study on failure modes of steel truss bridge gusset plates related to tension and shear block failure. International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(3), 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-3007-5
  24. Laufer, J., Becker, V., & Wagner, W. (2017). Gradient enhancement of a transversely isotropic continuum damage model. Composite Structures, 181, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.064
  25. Lee, S. W., Kim, S. H., & Mha, H. S. (2004). Seismic retrofit prioritization of bridges based on damage risk and failure cost analysis. In 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouare, Canada.
  26. Mangalathu, S., Heo, G., & Jeon, J. S. (2018). Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes. Engineering Structures, 162, 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.053
  27. Mayes, R. (1993). Response of isolated structures to recent California earthquakes. In Structural engineering in natural hazards mitigation, ASCE, New York, NY.
  28. Mitchell, D., Bruneau, M., Williams, M., Anderson, D., Saatcloglu, M., & Robert, S. (1995). Performance of bridges in the 1994 northridge earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-050
  29. Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2014). Investigation into central-difference and Newmark’s beta method in measuring dynamic responses. Advanced Materials Research, 831, 95-99.
  30. Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2015). Numerical analysis of dynamic responses of the plate subjected to impulsive loads. International journal of Civil, Environmental, Structureal, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(9), 1148-1151.
  31. Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2017). Analytical method to investigate nonlinear dynamic responses of sandwich plates with FGM faces resting on elastic foundation considering blast loads. Composite Structures, 174, 142-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.087
  32. Muntasir Billah, A. H. M., & Sharia Alam, M. (2016). Plastic hinge of shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced concrete bridge pier. Engineering Structures, 117, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.050
  33. Nielson, B., & DesRoches, R. (2007). Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(6), 823-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655
  34. Park, Y., Joe, W., Park, J., Hwang, M., & Choi, B. H. (2012). An experimental study on after-fracture redundancy of continuous span two-girder bridges. International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(1), 1-13.
  35. Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Fatigue life assessment for a composite box girder bridge. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14(4), 543-853.
  36. Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Hoboken: Wiley.
  37. Quanani, M., & Tiliouine, B. (2017). Progressive seismic failure of a highway bridge including abutment-backfill interaction. Current Science, 112(2), 335-363.
  38. Russo, F. M., Wipe, T. J., Klaiber, F. W., & Paradis, R. (2000). Evaluation and repair of damaged prestressed concrete girder bridges. In Mid - continent transportation symposium proceedings.
  39. Saiidi, M., Maragakis, E., & O’Connor, D. (1995). Seismic performance of the Madrone bridge during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Structural Engineering Review, 7(3), 219-230.
  40. Seo, J., & Rogers, L. P. (2017). Comparison of curved prestressed concrete bridge population response between area and spine modeling approaches toward efficient seismic vulnerability analysis. Engineering Structures, 150, 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.033
  41. Shrestha, B., Hao, H., & Bi, K. (2013). Pounding and unseating damage mitigation on bridge structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions using restrainers rubber bumpers. In Conference of Australian earthquake engineering society, Tasamania, Nov. 15-17.
  42. Zheng, Y., Dong, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.031

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic Assessment of a Benchmark Highway Bridge Equipped with Optimized Shape Memory Alloy Wire-Based Isolators vol.10, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010141