Acknowledgement
Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital
References
- Soergel F, Jean B, Seiler T, Bende T, Mucke S, Pechhold W, et al. Dynamic mechanical spectroscopy of the cornea for measurement of its viscoelastic properties in vitro. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4:151-6.
- Dupps WJ Jr, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res 2006;83:709-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2006.03.015
- Lau W, Pye D. Changes in corneal biomechanics and applanation tonometry with induced corneal swelling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:3207-14. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6754
- Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031
- Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3262-8. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1556
- Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Colin J, Maurice-Tison S, Kerautret J. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2403-10. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3689
- Roberts C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S589-92.
- Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
- Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2009;28:765-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181967082
- Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036
- Narayanaswamy A, Chung RS, Wu RY, Park J, Wong WL, Saw SM, et al. Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1253-9.
- Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Ambrosio R Jr, Kang DS, Lopes BT, et al. Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg 2016;32:550-61. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160524-01
- Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 2014;30:310-8. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140422-01
- Hassan Z, Modis L Jr, Szalai E, Berta A, Nemeth G. Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014;37:337-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2014.05.001
- Tomita M, Mita M, Huseynova T. Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1013-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.012
- Vellara HR, Ali NQ, Gokul A, Turuwhenua J, Patel DV, McGhee CN. Quantitative analysis of corneal energy dissipation and corneal and orbital deformation in response to an air-pulse in healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:6941-7. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17396
- Valbon BF, Ambrosio R Jr, Fontes BM, Alves MR. Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2013;76:229-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492013000400008
- Lee H, Kang DS, Ha BJ, Choi JY, Kim EK, Seo KY, et al. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the dynamic Scheimp flug analyzer in young healthy adults. Cornea 2017;36:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001001
- Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035
- Sahin A, Bayer A, Ozge G, Mumcuoglu T. Corneal biomechanical changes in diabetes mellitus and their influence on intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4597-604. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2763
- Kotecha A, Oddone F, Sinapis C, Elsheikh A, Sinapis D, Sinapis A, et al. Corneal biomechanical characteristics in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:1822-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.027
- Zhong Y, Shen X, Yu J, Tan H, Cheng Y. The comparison of the effects of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost on central corneal thickness. Cornea 2011;30:861-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182000c27
- Koprowski R. Automatic method of analysis and measurement of additional parameters of corneal deformation in the Corvis tonometer. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-150
- Shen Y, Zhao J, Yao P, Miao H, Niu L, Wang X, et al. Changes in corneal deformation parameters after lenticule creation and extraction during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure. PLoS One 2014;9:e103893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103893
- Hon Y, Lam AK. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318279eb87
- Naumova EN, Must A, Laird NM. Tutorial in biostatistics: evaluating the impact of 'critical periods' in longitudinal studies of growth using piecewise mixed effects models. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1332-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.6.1332
- Ryan SE, Porth LS. A tutorial on the piecewise regression approach applied to bedload transport data. Fort Collins (CO): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2007.
- Friedrichs KR, Harr KE, Freeman KP, Szladovits B, Walton RM, Barnhart KF, et al. ASVCP reference interval guidelines: determination of de novo reference intervals in veterinary species and other related topics. Vet Clin Pathol 2012;41:441-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12006
- Horowitz GL, Altaie S, Boyd JC, Ceriotti F, Garg U, Horn P, et al. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guidelines. 3rd ed. CLSI document C28-A3. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
- Valbon BF, Ambrosio R Jr, Fontes BM, Luz A, Roberts CJ, Alves MR. Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg 2014;30:468-73. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140521-01
- Bak-Nielsen S, Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg 2014;30:408-14. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140513-02
- Huseynova T, Waring GO 4th, Roberts C, Krueger RR, Tomita M. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:885-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.024
- Asaoka R, Nakakura S, Tabuchi H, Murata H, Nakao Y, Ihara N, et al. The relationship between Corvis ST tonometry measured corneal parameters and intraocular pressure, corneal thickness and corneal curvature. PLoS One 2015;10:e0140385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140385
- Kotecha A, Russell RA, Sinapis A, Pourjavan S, Sinapis D, Garway-Heath DF. Biomechanical parameters of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal eyes. BMC Ophthalmol 2014;14:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-11
- Knox Cartwright NE, Tyrer JR, Marshall J. Age-related differences in the elasticity of the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4324-9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4798
- Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M, Rama P, Campanelli M, Pye D. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res 2007;32:11-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680601077145
- Daxer A, Misof K, Grabner B, Ettl A, Fratzl P. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:644-8.
- Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alio JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.021
- Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg 2009;25:888-93. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090917-10
- Fontes BM, Ambrosio R Jr, Alonso RS, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of -19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg 2008;24:941-5. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20081101-14
Cited by
- Comparison of Intraocular Pressures Measured by the Corvis ST and Other Tonometers in Normal Eyes vol.60, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2019.60.12.1250
- Analysis of Factors Affecting Corneal Deflection Amplitude in Normal Korean Eyes vol.61, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2020.61.5.538
- Time-varying regularity of changes in biomechanical properties of the corneas after removal of anterior corneal tissue vol.20, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00948-7